Chalmers was elected a fellow of the Academy of Humanities in 1997. His primary research interest is the philosophy of science and he is author of the best-selling textbook What Is This Thing Called Science? which has been translated into many languages.
He has been a visiting scholar at the Flinders University Philosophy Department since 1999. For the 2007 fall semester he was a visiting professor at the University of Pittsburgh.
Chalmers is an associate professor at the History and Philosophy of Science department of the University of Sydney.
Books:
Science and Its Fabrication, Open University Press and University of Minnesota Press, 1990, pp. 142+xii. (Translated into French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Korean, Portuguese and Chinese.)
What Is This Thing Called Science?, 3rd revised edition, University of Queensland Press, Hackett, 1999. (Originally published 1976; second edition: 1982.)
The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone – How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms, Springer, 2009, pp. 288+xii.
写在前面: 这篇文章并非专为这本书所写,但确实是很大程度上受到这本书的影响才写的。是一组在写的文章之一。另一篇是:《“方差”漫谈之一:从人和猴子说起》(http://www.douban.com/note/256625376/)希望有兴趣的朋友能来交流指正~ 正文: 凭借一...
评分第一眼看到这本书,就想翻一翻。翻开来看了下目录,又看了几页,就被内容迷住了。对科学的本质做了详细的论述,对于在学术道路上遇到深层次的哲学问题的学生有很好的帮助,是一本不错的科学哲学书籍,可以反复读出不同的味道,并找到自己的支持与反对。
评分应该说社科院哲学所邱仁宗先生是科学哲学界的老前辈了。不过,商务印书馆2007年出版、鲁旭东翻译的该书的另一中译本不论是对原文的理解上还是文字的通顺、易读上都比邱译要好。
评分比较简单的科学哲学书籍,读的深入的话还是有所收获的,前几章非常清晰,后面批判归纳之后有些不如之前简明,可能因为问题也更加复杂了,或许由于出版时间关系本书只说道费耶阿本德,对于劳丹,邦格等没有叙述。
评分第一眼看到这本书,就想翻一翻。翻开来看了下目录,又看了几页,就被内容迷住了。对科学的本质做了详细的论述,对于在学术道路上遇到深层次的哲学问题的学生有很好的帮助,是一本不错的科学哲学书籍,可以反复读出不同的味道,并找到自己的支持与反对。
理了一下对于科学态度和科学观的思路。
评分第一本英语书,虽然看过翻译的,可是读起来还是很吃力
评分@2020-01-20 12:20:44
评分很好的教材,这学期科哲导论由外教带,期末全英文闭卷考也是生平第一次。虽然考完了,剩下的部分还是要看完
评分这本太浅了,感觉没什么收获
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有