P. J. 费贝尔曼 固体物理学家。1967年获加州大学圣迭戈分校物理博士学位。先后在法国萨克莱国家原子核研究中心和美国伊利诺大学厄尔巴那分校做博士后研究。其后有三年时间,在美国纽约州立大学石溪分校任物理学助理教授。1974年后在桑地亚国家实验室,成为技术部门的杰出成员。1989年荣获美国物理学会为表面科学的杰出研究人员设立的戴维逊-革末尔奖。
Despite your graduate education, brainpower, and technical prowess, your career in scientific research is far from assured. Permanent positions are scarce, science survival is rarely part of formal graduate training, and a good mentor is hard to find. This exceptional volume explains what stands between you and fulfilling long-term research career. Bringing the key survival skills into focus, A Ph.D. Is Not Enough! proposes a rational approach to establishing yourself as a scientist. It offers sound advice of selecting a thesis or postdoctoral adviser, choosing among research jobs in academia, government laboratories, and industry, preparing for an employment interview, and defining a research program. This book will help you make your oral presentations effective, your journal articles compelling, and your grant proposals successful. A Ph.D. Is Not Enough should be required reading for anyone on the threshold of a career in science.
一句话来概括: Time is everything(the clock is ticking), and publication is everything 两句话来概括: Publish a series of short papers instead of the final one. Put yourself in the shoes of your audience: interview, presentation
评分文科生,正准备读博,看了之后也有一丝丝启发。感觉对于理工科博士应该非常有启发吧。感觉文科和理工科还挺不一样的,但大家都应该不天真到发傻吧,希望能对博士、学术工作有一个相对理性的认识。感觉多了解一点会有帮助的吧。也希望已经找工作或者即将毕业的文科博士可以补充~...
评分It is a pocket book, means you needn't spent weeks or even months to read. I finished it at my weekend, and did have an enjoy. This book taught you how to become a survival scientist. In my opinion, the author is only emphasized on 2 things: 1. You should...
评分The big help of this book for me is above(refer to the title). I spent a lot of time doing experiment every day. Though I know it's important definitely, I don't know the exact reason. In other words, I don't have a whole picture of view of...
评分写给naive博士生的学术圈生存指南
评分科学建制后,科研作为一种职业早已走下神坛走出象牙塔,这本书为如何走好科研职业生涯提供了很多“实用主义”的建议,从就业、如何tenured,到如何写申请书、做什么样的项目发什么样的论文……在科研圈竞争白热化的今天,其中的很多已经成为常识。做软科学的和做硬科学的人应该会有不同的读后感,对我而言,其中关于大学与科研机构差异的论述是意外收获。(另,作者是个很有趣且科研经历丰富的人)
评分a thriller
评分基本上就是要告诉博士生或者博士后在学术界的生存之道。将年轻的导师说得一无是处,几乎让人认为他们全都是生意人,下属全部是他们的筹码,年轻导师都是朝三暮四没有条理的安排工作,经验不丰富,不能给读博士者更多的自由,也不让他们有更大的发展空间。年老的导师却心如止水,可以将机会让给后辈,以手下的成就为自己的骄傲=。= 这样在理论上仿若做梦的书,怎么会有这么多人认可....虽然实际也有这样的情况,但学术界的处世之道并非都是如此的..导师和博士们都自重吧
评分4.5 2009 summer
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有