In a rented convent in Santa Fe, a revolution has been brewing. The activists are not anarchists, but rather Nobel Laureates in physics and economics such as Murray Gell-Mann and Kenneth Arrow, and pony-tailed graduate students, mathematicians, and computer scientists down from Los Alamos. They've formed an iconoclastic think tank called the Santa Fe Institute, and their radical idea is to create a new science called complexity. These mavericks from academe share a deep impatience with the kind of linear, reductionist thinking that has dominated science since the time of Newton. Instead, they are gathering novel ideas about interconnectedness, coevolution, chaos, structure, and order - and they're forging them into an entirely new, unified way of thinking about nature, human social behavior, life, and the universe itself. They want to know how a primordial soup of simple molecules managed to turn itself into the first living cell - and what the origin of life some four billion years ago can tell us about the process of technological innovation today. They want to know why ancient ecosystems often remained stable for millions of years, only to vanish in a geological instant - and what such events have to do with the sudden collapse of Soviet communism in the late 1980s. They want to know why the economy can behave in unpredictable ways that economists can't explain - and how the random process of Darwinian natural selection managed to produce such wonderfully intricate structures as the eye and the kidney. Above all, they want to know how the universe manages to bring forth complex structures such as galaxies, stars, planets, bacteria, plants, animals, and brains. There are commonthreads in all of these queries, and these Santa Fe scientists seek to understand them. Complexity is their story: the messy, funny, human story of how science really happens. Here is the tale of Brian Arthur, the Belfast-born economist who stubbornly pushed his theories of economic ch
大学的时候,放弃其他的专业,选择化学,其原因是对 化学中那奇妙的反应着迷,想去了解。 普利高津的耗散理论,熵。 这个世界到底是会变成什么样呢? 岁月流逝,当时的激情已然不再,化学也离我远去。 看了复杂这本书,又让我感觉回到当时对这个世界的事务那种追求理解的年代...
评分大学的时候,放弃其他的专业,选择化学,其原因是对 化学中那奇妙的反应着迷,想去了解。 普利高津的耗散理论,熵。 这个世界到底是会变成什么样呢? 岁月流逝,当时的激情已然不再,化学也离我远去。 看了复杂这本书,又让我感觉回到当时对这个世界的事务那种追求理解的年代...
评分这是一本早就听说过的好书。我的硕士导师指定的必读书之一。我看了第一章,已经觉得很受吸引了。为此我还查阅了encarta上的美国地图,考察了旧金山的几座大桥,沿着阿瑟的行走路线好好地神游了一番。我还上google搜索了阿瑟的照片,下载了下来。我在看书的时候,禁不住会有一种...
评分生物体经常相互适应而得以进化,从而将自己组合成为精巧协调的平衡系统;原子通过相互化合得以找到最小的能量状态,从而使自己形成被称之为分子的结构。在所有这些情形中,一组组单个的动因在寻求相互适应与自我延续中或这样、或那样地超越了自己,从而获得了生命、思想、目的...
评分每当已有的科学架构不足以解决一个集合的问题,新的学科就会孕育而出。不同于其它基于某学科而新设置的亚学科,复杂性科学是一门全新的科学,和传统的还原论相反,它呼吁将不同层次的元素的结合。即,“整体大于部分之和”。 有人认为科学之美在于简单,而复杂却和简单相悖。...
不如Nexus好玩,但五星妥妥地。“看来生而为人还是有好处的”系列=w=
评分比另一本Complexity更具故事性和领域上的丰富性
评分相遇总比相守来的奇幻,恋爱总比婚姻来的耐看。本书如果只停留在artificial life的struggling之前,即santa fe形成之时,会更加多彩。后面对Langton经历的细致描画,虽然是励志是奇迹,却开始偏离主线。接下来对institute经费紧张等行政状况记录,更加是柴米油盐酱醋茶。不能说不好,只是有些添足。 好吧,作为混沌与秩序之间,这样的复杂可能就是作者想达成的效果吧。
评分精彩至极。
评分很久以前就读过。中文版本已经成为国内复杂性研究领域的启蒙书。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有