Since its debut, Policy Paradox has been widely acclaimed as the most accessible policy text available. Unlike most texts, which treat policy analysis and policy making as different enterprises, Policy Paradox demonstrates that "you can’t take politics out of analysis." Through a uniquely rich and comprehensive model, this revised edition continues to show how real-world policy grows out of differing ideals, even definitions, of basic societal goals like security, equality, and liberty. The book also demonstrates how these ideals often conflict in policy implementation.
In this revised edition, Stone has added a full-length case study as an appendix, taking up the issue of affirmative action. Clear, provocative, and engaging, Policy Paradox conveys the richness of public policy making and analysis.
具体描述
读后感
政策分析领域较为时新的学术专著，区别于许多国内概论式的教科书。以“悖论”为视角，阐述了政策分析和制定过程中的复杂性——价值标准存在无数争议+制定过程中多重主体的相互影响等。对于传统step-by-step政策分析流程的理论提出了挑战。
评分不厚道地转帖，因为无法和原作者取得联络，而这段原本也只是一个网志留言。因为大陆能够接触到台湾出版的书的机会少。看到一个有意思的且（算是）评论或读后感的就擅自贴上来吧... —————————————————————————— 要我簡單概述一下這本書的企圖，她的論...
评分不厚道地转帖，因为无法和原作者取得联络，而这段原本也只是一个网志留言。因为大陆能够接触到台湾出版的书的机会少。看到一个有意思的且（算是）评论或读后感的就擅自贴上来吧... —————————————————————————— 要我簡單概述一下這本書的企圖，她的論...
评分Policy making is art instead of science. This is how I feel after reading Deborah Stone's Book, Policy Paradox. I read the book, comfortable with the framework Stone used, “goals set, problems defined, and solutions sought”, which follows the rational log...
评分政策分析领域较为时新的学术专著，区别于许多国内概论式的教科书。以“悖论”为视角，阐述了政策分析和制定过程中的复杂性——价值标准存在无数争议+制定过程中多重主体的相互影响等。对于传统step-by-step政策分析流程的理论提出了挑战。
用户评价
polis
评分polis
评分too liberal, might be a complement to rational choice theory rather than a replacement
评分纯粹因为那个爱尔兰小伙子和黎巴嫩团体来读的原文 不錯的textbook
评分深受启发。政治学看似清楚，往深处走一步就发现模糊不已。所有的概念和理论，在加入量化之后就变得似是而非了。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有