Niccolò Machiavelli (born May 3, 1469, Florence-died June 21, 1527, Florence) Italian statesman, historian, and political theorist. He rose to power after the overthrow of Girolamo Savonarola, was appointed secretary and Second Chancellor to the Florentine Republic in 1498. Working as a diplomat for 14 years, he came in contact with the most powerful figures in Europe. He was dismissed when the Medici family returned to power in 1512, and during the next year he was arrested and tortured for conspiracy. Though soon released, he was not permitted to return to public office. His famous treatise The Prince (1513, published 1532) is a handbook for rulers; though dedicated to Lorenzo de' Medici, ruler of Florence from 1513, it failed to win Machiavelli his favour. Machiavelli viewed The Prince as an objective description of political reality. Because he viewed human nature as venal, grasping, and thoroughly self-serving, he suggested that ruthless cunning is appropriate to the conduct of government. Though admired for its incisive brilliance, the book also has been widely condemned as cynical and amoral, and “Machiavellian” has come to mean deceitful, unscrupulous, and manipulative. His other works include a set of discourses on Livy (completed c. 1518), the comedy The Mandrake (completed c. 1518), The Art of War (published 1521), and the Florentine Histories (completed c. 1525).
Throughout history, some books have changed the world. They have transformed the way we see ourselves and each other. They have inspire d debate, dissent, war and revolution. They have enlightened, outraged, provoked and comforted. They have enriched lives and destroyed them. Now Penguin brings you the works of the great thinkers, pioneers, radicals and visionaries whose ideas shook civilization, and helped make us who we are.
我前日写了一篇文章(https://www.douban.com/note/741354078/),简单地对比了刘训练翻译的【君主论】与潘汉典翻译的【君主论】字句的相似处。提出了【刘训练译本是完全以潘译本为底本,参照英文版译本修改字句的潘译本“加工本”,刘训练不应该单独署译者名】这一观点。拙文...
評分首先,让我们先确立一个方向:这本书是谁写给谁看的。 这本书是一个知识分子在观察历史与意大利诸侯割据的现状下“以平原的目光来观察山峰”的角度写给身居高位的君主看的。 明确了这个方向,就要确定一些范围 时代范围——处于什么样的一个历史时期,作者...
評分很显然,马基雅维里是一代政治学导师。真实的太真实的,残忍与冷酷只配俯首于权力之下并供之驱使。不要把它们上升为人性之中阴暗一面,在我看来它比加州阳光还更令人心旷神怡。如果个人作为社会整体的一部分,那在各种需要层次被涵盖满足过后,君主就是自我实现的唯一途径。...
評分政治哲学是历史的发明,同时也在发明历史,其所关注的乃是如何规范政治来规范历史。因此讨论某种政治哲人理念的时候,总是绕不开对观念谱系的梳理,马基雅维利亦是如此。对一个人的经典化往往是历史积累而来,今日我们耳熟能详的话语在彼时却有开天辟地的意义,不还原历史自然...
評分以下是我读《君主论》时的书摘,摘到一半时,我突然发现,如果把文中的部分词汇改一下,这本《君主论》就可以变成一本可以指导男人追女人,解决一些困难的情感事务的《男人论》。 不过,当你开始阅读下面的文章前,最好心里有一个清楚的认识,就是“不择手段”是有前提...
說馬基雅維利權術簡單的咋不上天?
评分its just a business
评分PL091 - Perspective
评分文本內在的極大張力,多方麵不同層次的意涵造就瞭這部經典——就好像《資本論》之於經濟學,《君主論》一方麵,沒有完全擺脫主體,去研究客觀的係統;但反過來說,馬基雅維利研究的本來也不是政治科學(正如馬剋思要做的是在整體上把握資本主義,而非“經濟”)。所以讀這類著作的方法也不應該是消解分析式的,即將其中論斷歸納到政治倫理等分科之學中去,再去判斷其於該“科”學的意義;而是綜閤地用一種同情去理解——就好像讀一部小說——去把握其中整體的“形象”。
评分文本內在的極大張力,多方麵不同層次的意涵造就瞭這部經典——就好像《資本論》之於經濟學,《君主論》一方麵,沒有完全擺脫主體,去研究客觀的係統;但反過來說,馬基雅維利研究的本來也不是政治科學(正如馬剋思要做的是在整體上把握資本主義,而非“經濟”)。所以讀這類著作的方法也不應該是消解分析式的,即將其中論斷歸納到政治倫理等分科之學中去,再去判斷其於該“科”學的意義;而是綜閤地用一種同情去理解——就好像讀一部小說——去把握其中整體的“形象”。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有