Leo Strauss (1899--1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as ever. "Strauss ...makes a significant contribution towards an understanding of the intellectual crisis in which we find ourselves ...[and] brings to his task an admirable scholarship and a brilliant, incisive mind."--John H. Hallowell, American Political Science Review Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
列奥.斯特劳斯:“我认为韦伯的论点必然导致虚无主义,或者导致以下观点,即每种偏好,无论怎样的邪恶、卑鄙或疯狂,在理性法庭的面前和任何其他偏好一样都被判定为正当的”。 虽然“价值中立”者说他们只是在学术研究的过程中持“中立”立场,但实际上,由于他们把价值和信仰...
評分 評分 評分权利与善不是先后问题,而是从属问题,如桑德尔所言,权利并不独立于善。 现代权利论的核心是平等。随历史的发展,平等待人成为重要的善。 此书中,感觉施氏的观点是隐晦的,这种隐晦不是说他的抨击不明确,他抨击历史主义和价值中立都很明确,只是抨击过后,要建立什么?回到...
評分Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1965 B. Locke At first glance Locke seems to reject altogether Hobbes's notion of natural law and to follow the traditional teaching. 【总论点:洛克对霍布斯的隐蔽继承】 Yet Lo...
有瞭閑暇細讀這本書,驚覺中譯本糟糕得簡直像是譯者自己重寫瞭另一本書。
评分This is actually a book about Political Theology
评分有瞭閑暇細讀這本書,驚覺中譯本糟糕得簡直像是譯者自己重寫瞭另一本書。
评分每一章的分析都那麼精妙絕倫。。
评分legōmen oun arxamenoi
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有