Leo Strauss (1899--1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as ever. "Strauss ...makes a significant contribution towards an understanding of the intellectual crisis in which we find ourselves ...[and] brings to his task an admirable scholarship and a brilliant, incisive mind."--John H. Hallowell, American Political Science Review Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
【按语:在“导论”中,施特劳斯申明了《自然权利与历史》的旨趣:对“自然正当”的拒斥会导致相对主义和虚无。【5】随后正文中描述了“自然正当”及其失落的历史。章1警告历史主义路径会摧毁普遍规范和诸多现实之唯一根基;章2揭示说韦伯的事实-价值二分法最终导向主观论;章3...
评分 评分 评分越往后读,越明白施特劳斯为什么在开篇处反对所谓历史主义:他批评近代政治哲学家太强调描述人,而忽视了人的应该,忽视了人所具有的能够达到高贵的潜能——所以此书以抨击历史主义和韦伯的价值中立开篇。因为历史主义相当于放弃了他想捍卫的那个超越时代的绝对的、客观的自然...
评分越往后读,越明白施特劳斯为什么在开篇处反对所谓历史主义:他批评近代政治哲学家太强调描述人,而忽视了人的应该,忽视了人所具有的能够达到高贵的潜能——所以此书以抨击历史主义和韦伯的价值中立开篇。因为历史主义相当于放弃了他想捍卫的那个超越时代的绝对的、客观的自然...
虽说leo Strauss被人捧杀了,但这本书不可否认是天才的作品啊。
评分有了闲暇细读这本书,惊觉中译本糟糕得简直像是译者自己重写了另一本书。
评分Worth reading again and again and again...
评分只读了前两章。。该是读过的最难懂的了。。
评分I stopped so many times that I couldn't believe I finally finish the book. Strauss has pictured a big enough one for me to paint the line of history, however only the starting point. I don't know how long it will take to finish. Maybe, it is not even necessary to finish the line. I believe it must a circle, a zero, or nothing.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有