图书标签: Chomsky 传播 美国 媒体 政治 Noam Herman 思维
发表于2024-11-21
Manufacturing Consent pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
In this pathbreaking work, now with a new introduction, Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky show that, contrary to the usual image of the news media as cantankerous, obstinate, and ubiquitous in their search for truth and defense of justice, in their actual practice they defend the economic, social, and political agendas of the privileged groups that dominate domestic society, the state, and the global order.
Based on a series of case studies—including the media’s dichotomous treatment of “worthy” versus “unworthy” victims, “legitimizing” and “meaningless” Third World elections, and devastating critiques of media coverage of the U.S. wars against Indochina—Herman and Chomsky draw on decades of criticism and research to propose a Propaganda Model to explain the media’s behavior and performance. Their new introduction updates the Propaganda Model and the earlier case studies, and it discusses several other applications. These include the manner in which the media covered the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement and subsequent Mexican financial meltdown of 1994-1995, the media’s handling of the protests against the World Trade Organization, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund in 1999 and 2000, and the media’s treatment of the chemical industry and its regulation. What emerges from this work is a powerful assessment of how propagandistic the U.S. mass media are, how they systematically fail to live up to their self-image as providers of the kind of information that people need to make sense of the world, and how we can understand their function in a radically new way.
Edward S. Herman is Professor Emeritus of Finance at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Noam Chomsky is Professor, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
这就是为什么纽约时报中文版读起来像大纪元。
评分本来想当参考文献随便翻翻 然后就看完了。。。。。
评分跳读,介绍-前言-越南战争一章-结语。作者提供了不同层次上的资本主义民主国家大众媒体研究范式,最宏观的政治经济学模型在“前言”集中给出,其他应用于具体媒体行为的概念范畴多散落在略显繁冗的案例研究中。在“结语”部分,作者尝试勾勒大模型和具体概念之间的关系,显得仓促,却留足了探索空间。自由国家大众媒体研究的开创性可见一斑,但更强烈的印象是作者的意识形态异见者精神——但正因异见以正见为依托,而正见有任何意识形态的大一统属性,因而异见也显得宏大却粗糙。
评分本来想当参考文献随便翻翻 然后就看完了。。。。。
评分This is when I realized every media is controlled by parties with mutual interests.
不同于早期的施拉姆(Schramm)式的御用文人大肆抨击苏联共产主义媒体制度的缺陷,也不同于哈林和曼奇尼(Hallin and Mancini)将polarised pluralist model视为至差的媒体类型,赫尔曼和乔姆斯基将矛头指向了美国这个世界上言论最自由的国家(乔姆斯基语)。 如果你对乔姆斯基...
评分不同于早期的施拉姆(Schramm)式的御用文人大肆抨击苏联共产主义媒体制度的缺陷,也不同于哈林和曼奇尼(Hallin and Mancini)将polarised pluralist model视为至差的媒体类型,赫尔曼和乔姆斯基将矛头指向了美国这个世界上言论最自由的国家(乔姆斯基语)。 如果你对乔姆斯基...
评分不同于早期的施拉姆(Schramm)式的御用文人大肆抨击苏联共产主义媒体制度的缺陷,也不同于哈林和曼奇尼(Hallin and Mancini)将polarised pluralist model视为至差的媒体类型,赫尔曼和乔姆斯基将矛头指向了美国这个世界上言论最自由的国家(乔姆斯基语)。 如果你对乔姆斯基...
评分不同于早期的施拉姆(Schramm)式的御用文人大肆抨击苏联共产主义媒体制度的缺陷,也不同于哈林和曼奇尼(Hallin and Mancini)将polarised pluralist model视为至差的媒体类型,赫尔曼和乔姆斯基将矛头指向了美国这个世界上言论最自由的国家(乔姆斯基语)。 如果你对乔姆斯基...
评分不同于早期的施拉姆(Schramm)式的御用文人大肆抨击苏联共产主义媒体制度的缺陷,也不同于哈林和曼奇尼(Hallin and Mancini)将polarised pluralist model视为至差的媒体类型,赫尔曼和乔姆斯基将矛头指向了美国这个世界上言论最自由的国家(乔姆斯基语)。 如果你对乔姆斯基...
Manufacturing Consent pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024