具体描述
《第一哲学沉思录•伦理学(英文版)》收录了理性主义代表人物笛卡尔和斯宾诺莎两部著作。“我思,故我在。”西方近代哲学之父笛卡尔以这一经典命题表明了与前此的传统哲学决裂,阐扬天赋观念论和理性至上论。另一位理性主义代表人物斯宾诺莎确信只有象几何学一样,凭理性的能力从最初几个由直观获得的定义和公理推论出来的知识,才是最可靠的知识。
作者简介
RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650), a French philosopher and writer who has been called the "Father of Modern Philosophy," and in particular, his Meditations on First Philosophy continues to be a standard text at most university philosophy departments.
Descartes is perhaps best known for the philosophical statement "Cogito ergo sum" (I think, therefore I am; or I do think, therefore I do exist).
BARUCH DE SPINOZA (1632,-1677) was a Dutch philosopher. By laying the groundwork for the i8th century Enlightenment and modern biblical criticism, he came to be considered one of the great rationalist's of the 17th-century philosophy Gilles Delouse names him "the prince of philosophers."
目录信息
INTRODUCTION
PREFACE TO THE READER
SYNOPSIS OF THE SIX FOLLOWING MEDITATIONS
MEDITATION I OF THE THINGS OF WHICH WE
MAY DOUBT
MEDITATION II OF THE NATURE OF THE HUMAN
MIND; AND THAT IT IS MORE EASILY KNOWN
THAN THE BODY
MEDITATION III OF GOD: THAT HE EXISTS
MEDITATION IV OF TRUTH AND ERROR
MEDITATION V OF THE ESSENCE OF
MATERIAL THINGS; AND, AGAIN, OF GOD;
THAT HE EXISTS
MEDITATION VI OF THE EXISTENCE OF MATERIAL
THINGS,AND OF THE REAL DISTINCTION
BETWEEN THE MIND AND BODY OF MAN
PART I CONCERNING GOD
PART II OF THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF
THE MIND
PART III ON THE ORIGIN AND NATURE OF
THE EMOTIONS
PARTIV OF HUMAN BONDAGE OR THE STRENGTH OF THE EMOTIONS
PART V ON THE POWER OF THE UNDERSTANDING,OR OF HUMAN ·
· · · · · · (收起)
读后感
3 The first objection is that though, would the humor mind reflects on itself, it does not perceive that it is any other than a flunking thing, it does not follow that its nature or essence consists only in its being a thing loch thinks; so that the ...
3 The first objection is that though, would the humor mind reflects on itself, it does not perceive that it is any other than a flunking thing, it does not follow that its nature or essence consists only in its being a thing loch thinks; so that the ...
3 The first objection is that though, would the humor mind reflects on itself, it does not perceive that it is any other than a flunking thing, it does not follow that its nature or essence consists only in its being a thing loch thinks; so that the ...
3 The first objection is that though, would the humor mind reflects on itself, it does not perceive that it is any other than a flunking thing, it does not follow that its nature or essence consists only in its being a thing loch thinks; so that the ...
3 The first objection is that though, would the humor mind reflects on itself, it does not perceive that it is any other than a flunking thing, it does not follow that its nature or essence consists only in its being a thing loch thinks; so that the ...
用户评价
这本书的论证过程充满了对历史和前人思想的深刻对话与继承。在阅读过程中,我能清晰地感受到作者是如何巧妙地引用、反驳和重构了诸多历史上的伟大思想,形成自己独特的视角。他似乎总是在与柏拉图、康德或者其他前辈学者进行一场跨越时空的辩论,论点既有渊源又具创新。作者的论证方式非常扎实,每一步推导都有详尽的逻辑支持,很少使用空泛的口号或煽情的语言,一切都建立在严密的推理之上。这种严谨的学理态度,使得全书的论述具有极强的说服力和持久的生命力。读完之后,你会感觉自己的知识体系得到了极大的扩充和整合,它不仅仅提供了一套理论,更提供了一套审视世界、构建个人价值观的强大工具,让人在面对日常困境时,能以一种更为高远和清醒的视角去处理问题。
我花了整整一个下午的时间来体会这本书的语言风格,发现作者的叙事方式极为独特,充满了古典的韵味和哲学的思辨性。它不像现代的通俗读物那样急于给出结论,而是采取了一种非常迂回、层层递进的论证路径。句子结构复杂而精妙,充满了长短句的交错运用,时而如同溪流般潺潺前行,时而又如峭壁般陡然拔高,对读者的逻辑跟进能力提出了不低的要求。阅读时,我必须放慢呼吸,反复咀嚼每一个词语背后的多重含义,仿佛置身于一个古老的学园中,与智者进行着跨越时空的对话。这种写作风格极具辨识度,它不迎合大众,而是坚持着知识分子特有的那种对真理的执着探求,也正因此,每一次成功理解其中的深层逻辑时,都会带来巨大的智力满足感,那种感觉,就像是解开了一个困扰已久的谜团。
这本书的装帧设计真是令人眼前一亮,硬壳的质感拿在手里沉甸甸的,内页的纸张选用也非常考究,触感细腻,油墨印刷清晰,阅读起来非常舒适。排版布局清晰合理,字体大小适中,段落之间的留白恰到好处,长时间阅读也不会感到眼睛疲劳。封面设计简约而不失深度,黑白灰的经典搭配,仿佛在暗示着内容本身的严肃与永恒。尤其是侧边书脊的处理,烫金的文字在光线下泛着低调的光泽,整体散发出一种典雅、内敛的气质,完全符合其主题应有的厚重感。这本书的物理呈现本身就是一种艺术品,让人忍不住想把它陈列在书架的最显眼位置,时不时地去摩挲一下,感受那种纸张与墨水的温度。可以说,在如今这个追求速度和即时满足的时代,能拥有一本如此用心制作的书籍,本身就是一种难得的享受,它让阅读这件事回归到了一种近乎仪式感的体验中。
这本书的章节划分逻辑严谨得令人敬佩。它似乎不是简单地罗列观点,而是在构建一个宏大而精密的思想体系。每一章的过渡都像是按照某种内在的、必然的规律推进,前一章留下的悬念或论证的缺口,总能被下一章的开启巧妙地填补,形成一种“牵一发而动全身”的整体感。我特别留意了其中几处关键转折点,作者处理得极为克制,没有刻意制造戏剧性,而是通过概念的深化和范畴的拓宽,自然而然地引向新的高度。这种结构美学,体现了作者极高的思辨自律性,它要求读者必须按照既定的路径前行,任何跳跃性的阅读都可能导致理解上的偏差。对于那些喜欢探究事物底层架构的人来说,这本书的骨架设计简直是教科书级别的范本,让人在阅读过程中,不仅吸收了内容,更学习了一种组织思想的绝佳方法。
坦白说,这本书的阅读门槛相当高,初读时我感到了一种强烈的挫败感,许多核心概念的定义晦涩难懂,需要查阅大量的背景资料和辅助读物才能勉强跟上作者的思路。它需要的不仅仅是时间,更是一种近乎学徒般的耐心和投入。然而,一旦跨过了最初的那些“门槛”,你会发现作者在看似繁复的论述背后,隐藏着对人性最深刻的洞察和对存在本质的终极关怀。他似乎不满足于表面的现象描述,而是执着于挖掘那些驱动人类行为的最基本动力和道德准则的源头。这种近乎于“剥洋葱”式的深入挖掘,虽然过程痛苦,但一旦触及核心,那种豁然开朗的体验,远非轻松阅读所能比拟。它更像是一场智力上的马拉松,考验的不是速度,而是耐力和对终点的信念。
阅读过程不友好(。读书百遍,其义自见。推荐和SEP一起看 感觉笛卡尔迷之自信:我相信上帝一定不会赋予我错误的观念。。。
阅读过程不友好(。读书百遍,其义自见。推荐和SEP一起看 感觉笛卡尔迷之自信:我相信上帝一定不会赋予我错误的观念。。。
放弃
放弃
放弃