The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

American historian and philosopher of science, a leading contributor to the change of focus in the philosophy and sociology of science in the 1960s. Thomas Samuel Kuhn was born in Cincinnati, Ohio. He received a doctorate in theoretical physics from Harvard University in 1949. But he later shifted his interest to the history and philosophy of science, which he taught at Harvard, the University of California at Berkeley, Princeton University, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

In 1962, Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which depicted the development of the basic natural sciences in an innovative way. According to Kuhn, the sciences do not uniformly progress strictly by scientific method. Rather, there are two fundamentally different phases of scientific development in the sciences. In the first phase, scientists work within a paradigm (set of accepted beliefs). When the foundation of the paradigm weakens and new theories and scientific methods begin to replace it, the next phase of scientific discovery takes place. Kuhn believes that scientific progress—that is, progress from one paradigm to another—has no logical reasoning. Kuhn's theory has triggered widespread, controversial discussion across many scientific disciplines.

出版者:University Of Chicago Press
作者:Thomas S. Kuhn
出品人:
页数:264
译者:
出版时间:2012-4-30
价格:USD 15.00
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9780226458120
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 科学哲学 
  • 哲学 
  • 科学史 
  • science 
  • 历史 
  • 科学 
  • 英文版 
  • 科学人文 
  •  
想要找书就要到 小哈图书下载中心
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

A good book may have the power to change the way we see the world, but a great book actually becomes part of our daily consciousness, pervading our thinking to the point that we take it for granted, and we forget how provocative and challenging its ideas once were—and still are. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is that kind of book. When it was first published in 1962, it was a landmark event in the history and philosophy of science. Fifty years later, it still has many lessons to teach.

With The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn challenged long-standing linear notions of scientific progress, arguing that transformative ideas don’t arise from the day-to-day, gradual process of experimentation and data accumulation but that the revolutions in science, those breakthrough moments that disrupt accepted thinking and offer unanticipated ideas, occur outside of “normal science,” as he called it. Though Kuhn was writing when physics ruled the sciences, his ideas on how scientific revolutions bring order to the anomalies that amass over time in research experiments are still instructive in our biotech age.

This new edition of Kuhn’s essential work in the history of science includes an insightful introduction by Ian Hacking, which clarifies terms popularized by Kuhn, including paradigm and incommensurability, and applies Kuhn’s ideas to the science of today. Usefully keyed to the separate sections of the book, Hacking’s introduction provides important background information as well as a contemporary context. Newly designed, with an expanded index, this edition will be eagerly welcomed by the next generation of readers seeking to understand the history of our perspectives on science.

具体描述

读后感

评分

好的方面先不说了,个人有以下四点拙见: 1. 作者在论述中有自己的态度:相对赞成科技革命,而反对保守旧式。因而在对其论述中有明显的倾向性,这点在标题里没有体现出来。标题起得大而泛。 2. 想阐述的观点没有一个明晰的纲要,比如谜、反常、危机三点之间的性质,明明是有关...  

评分

《自然辨证法》 恩格斯 著 中共中央马、恩、列、斯著作编译局译 1971年8月1版 1971年9月1印 《科学革命的结构》 [美国] 托马斯•库恩 著 金吾伦 胡新和 译 北京大学出版社 2003年1月1版 2006年10月5印 以下引文中A表示前书,B表示后书 把这两本书放在一起比较,两位作...  

评分

一、关于范式 每个科学共同体都有着自己的一组承诺,以及自己的如何从事研究的模型。除了令人瞩目之外,科学成就还必须: 1、“空前地吸引一批坚定的用户者”,使他们脱离科学活动的其他竞争模式; 2、它们必须是开放性的,具有许多的问题,以留待“重新组成的一批实践者去解决...  

评分

评分

前言:我作为一个业余逼格提升爱好者,杂七杂八地读了一些科学哲学文章,并粗略地通读了托马斯•库恩的里程碑式著作《科学革命的结构》。恰逢所里也有人对此也有兴趣,姑且写点自己对这本书的理解,权当抛砖引玉。文中难免有偏颇疏漏之处,大家见谅。 托马斯•库恩所著...  

用户评价

评分

Pretty much ruined my interest to philosophy as a layman.

评分

Pretty much ruined my interest to philosophy as a layman.

评分

观点值得学习,但是这文字读着实在让人难受

评分

本书叙事宏大,干货很少,适合搞科学且不大读哲学的人,反之不适合

评分

Pretty much ruined my interest to philosophy as a layman.

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有