Higher education is neither neutral in its effects, and neither is it natural. Universities have evolved as institutions over time to perform certain key social, cultural and economic functions. Higher education has its own particular culture, social relations and practices, governed by certain social and discursive norms. As such, it is always implicated in relations of power through its function in society and its effects on individuals. For the student, these effects can be enabling and engaging, or limiting and diminishing. The purpose of this book is to add to more cognitive and pedagogic ways of understanding student learning and student experience in higher education, by exploring the effects of the institutionalisation of learning as studying within the university and the workings of power implicated within this.To this end, Part 1 of the book offers a review of our understanding of student learning and an account of the student experience as indicated by qualitative research in this area. It concludes that for some students and at certain times in a student's career a potentially productive and enlivening learning experience can be undermined by institutional norms and practices. In order to understand how this 'undermining' effect might come about, the second part of the book proposes a framework for conceptualising the institution as a context for learning which takes account of the role of power within this. The book then focuses specifically on the social and economic functions of higher education; the hidden curriculum produced by the institutionalisation of time, space, activity and the self; the social and discursive nature of productive (writing and speaking) and interpretive (reading and listening) learning tasks; and the special case of assessment.The final part of the book summarises the implications of this perspective for our understanding of the student experience and the challenges facing the student, and argues that the challenge for the institution is not the enhancement of learning per se, but the enhancement of the student's freedom to learn. The book aligns itself with the view that support for the realisation of an individual's potential to learn in an enlivening and engaging way is an issue of social justice. The book ends by proposing five conditions for enabling the achievement of this.The ideas discussed in this book are informed by theory and research on student learning and experience in higher education, the sociology of education, critical theory, psycho-analysis, critical discourse analysis, post-modernism, and critical humanism. The book provides an analysis of the complexities of the teaching and learning process in higher education and a reminder of the issue of power and social and institutional context within this. The book will be of interest to higher education researchers, educational developers, academics, and higher education managers.
當我閤上這本書時,腦海裏迴響的不是冷冰冰的學術術語,而是一種強烈的對“體製化”過程的反思。作者的文筆兼具學者般的嚴謹和散文般流暢,使得原本可能晦澀難懂的社會學和政治學概念,變得清晰可觸。我特彆被其中對於“專業化”浪潮如何重塑學科邊界的描述所震撼。在某些章節,作者仿佛化身為一位敏銳的社會觀察傢,揭示瞭當一門學科為瞭獲取資源和權威,不得不進行的自我“包裝”和“馴化”過程。這種“馴化”的代價,往往是犧牲瞭知識的跨界性和批判性。閱讀這些部分時,我常常會聯想到當代大學裏那些日益僵化的院係設置和資源分配機製,不禁思考,我們是否正在為瞭效率和可量化成果,而犧牲瞭真正偉大的思想突破的可能性?這本書的價值就在於,它讓我們能夠跳齣日常的行政事務,從一個宏觀的、曆史的維度審視我們每天所參與的教育活動,充滿瞭令人不安但又極其必要的警示意味。
评分不得不說,這本書的語言風格極其富有感染力,它有一種不動聲色的力量,能夠在看似平靜的陳述中蘊含著巨大的批判能量。作者似乎對“真理”這個概念保持著一種審慎的態度,與其說是在尋找絕對的答案,不如說是在解構那些被奉為圭臬的教條。我非常欣賞作者在討論大學與外部世界關係時所展現齣的那種辯證思維。例如,當大學試圖擁抱市場化、追求“相關性”和“應用性”時,它獲得瞭經濟上的支撐,但代價是什麼?書中詳細分析瞭這種“實用主義”侵蝕瞭大學作為獨立批判中心的傳統職能,使得知識生産越來越受製於短期利益的驅動。這種對“工具理性”泛濫的反思,在今天這個技術和商業邏輯主導的時代,顯得尤為迫切。這本書提供瞭一種必要的“慢思考”,讓我們有時間去衡量,我們所珍視的學術理想,正在以何種速度被現實的洪流所稀釋和改造。
评分這本書的結構設計非常巧妙,它沒有采用時間綫索的綫性敘事,而是圍繞幾個核心的、具有普適性的主題進行深度剖析,這使得不同學科背景的讀者都能找到切入點。我個人對其中關於“精英培養與社會流動”這一主題的論述印象最為深刻。作者通過梳理不同曆史時期,大學如何被用作篩選和固化社會階層的工具,揭示瞭教育在看似平等的門檻背後,隱藏的深刻的社會再生産機製。書中引用的案例對比鮮明,時而聚焦於某個貴族子弟如何通過教育鞏固其地位,時而又描繪底層知識分子如何奮力爭取哪怕一絲學術上的認可。這種強烈的對比,讓讀者無法輕易地將自己抽離齣來,而是被裹挾進這場永恒的關於機會與特權的辯論中。它讓我意識到,每一次關於“教育公平”的討論,背後都潛藏著更深層次的權力再分配的議題,而這些議題,早已在大學的早期建製中就埋下瞭伏筆。
评分這本書的敘事視角真是引人入勝,它沒有落入那種枯燥的理論堆砌,而是像一位經驗老到的曆史學傢,帶領我們穿梭於不同時代的學術殿堂。我尤其欣賞作者對於知識權力結構演變的細緻勾勒,那種對製度如何塑造思想、思想又如何反作用於製度的洞察力,簡直是教科書級彆的分析。比如,書中對中世紀大學形成初期,教會與世俗權力之間微妙平衡的探討,就讓我對現代高等教育的根基有瞭全新的理解。作者並沒有停留在錶麵的描述,而是深入挖掘瞭那些隱藏在學術規章背後的權力博弈。讀到那些關於早期學者如何爭取學術自治權的段落時,我幾乎能感受到那種知識分子在維護思想自由時所付齣的艱辛。這種對“誰來定義知識”這個核心問題的深度挖掘,使得整本書的論述充滿瞭張力和現實意義。它不僅僅是對曆史的迴顧,更像是一麵鏡子,映照齣我們今天所處的學術環境中的種種復雜性。對於任何關心教育本質的人來說,這本書無疑提供瞭極其寶貴的框架和視角。
评分這是一部需要反復品讀的著作,因為它不是提供答案的指南,而是激發深度提問的催化劑。我對作者在處理不同文化背景下的大學模式時的平衡感錶示贊賞。它並沒有將某一特定地區的學術傳統神化,而是平等地審視瞭不同地域的知識機構在應對現代化和全球化挑戰時的掙紮與適應。特彆是在探討知識的“邊界化”——即學科壁壘的加固如何阻礙瞭創新性思維的誕生——時,作者的分析極為深刻。那種對“知識孤島”現象的剖析,讓我對目前跨學科研究的睏境有瞭更清晰的認識。這本書讓人深思:我們培養下一代學者和思想傢的場所,究竟是在鼓勵他們成為某一領域的“專傢”,還是在培育能夠跨越鴻溝、重塑知識格局的“通纔”?這種對教育目標本身的拷問,貫穿始終,使得全書的閱讀體驗充滿瞭智力上的挑戰與滿足。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有