This book examines the idea of ‘parental responsibility’ in English law and what is expected of a responsible parent. The scope of ‘parental responsibility’, a key concept in family law, is undefined and often ambiguous. Yet, to date, more attention has been paid to how individuals acquire parental responsibility than to the question of the rights, powers, duties and responsibilities they have once they obtain it. This book redresses the balance by providing the first sustained examination of the different elements of parental responsibility, bringing together leading scholars to comment on specific aspects of its operation.
The book begins by exploring the conceptual underpinnings of parental responsibility in the context of parents’ and children’s rights. The analysis highlights the inherent constraints and limitations of ‘parental responsibility’ and how its scope has deliberately been curtailed in certain contexts. The book then considers what parental responsibility allows and requires in specific areas, for example, naming a child, education, religious upbringing, medical treatment, corporal punishment, dealing with any contracts entered into or property owned by the child, representing the child in legal proceedings, consenting to a child’s marriage or civil partnership and the law’s response to the death of a child. In the final section, the idea of the ‘responsible parent’ is considered in the contexts of child support, contact, tort and criminal law.
List of Contributors
Andrew Bainham is a Fellow of Christ’s College Cambridge and Reader in Family Law and Policy at the University of Cambridge. He was a founder member and first chair of the Cambridge Socio-Legal Group. For over a decade he was editor of the International Survey of Family Law, published on behalf of the International Society of Family Law. He is the author of Children: The Modern Law (3rd edn, Jordans, 2005). He is currently consultant to the Centre for Social Justice in connection with its ongoing Family Law Review. He is the author of many articles in the field of family law, the most recent of which is ‘Arguments about parentage’ (2008) 67 Cambridge Law Journal 322. He is the editor of Parents and Children (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2008).
Jo Bridgeman is a Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Sussex, where she is a founder member of the Child and Family Research Group and the Centre for Responsibilities, Rights and the Law. Her research and publications are in the field of healthcare law and the law regulating the care of children. Jo’s recent monograph Parental Responsibility, Young Children and Healthcare Law (Cam- bridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007) offers a critical analysis of moral, social and legal responsibilities for the healthcare of babies, infants and young children, informed by and developing the feminist ethic of care. This perspective also informs her work on the legal regulation of care, which is developing a conceptual framework of relational responsibility.
Shazia Choudhry is a Lecturer in Law at Queen Mary, University of London, and has also taught at the University of Newcastle (2002 to 2005). Prior to her academic work, she was a practising solicitor. Her areas of expertise and research interests are in family law, the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on various aspects of family law and the issue of ‘rights’ within family law in general. Shazia has published a number of articles on this subject which have been widely cited both nationally and internationally.
Elizabeth Cooke is a Professor of Law at the University of Reading; her main interests are in property law and family law. The sixth edition of The Family, Law and Society, written with Brenda Hale, David Pearl and Daniel Monk, was published in summer 2008. From July 2008, she is serving for five years as a Law Commissioner for England and Wales.
Paula Giliker is Professor of Comparative Law at the University of Bristol. She has previously taught at the University of Oxford and Queen Mary, University of London. Paula has published extensively in the field of comparative contract and tort law, is the co-author of Tort (3rd edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2008) and recently edited Re-examining Contract and Unjust Enrichment: Anglo-Canadian Perspec- tives (Leiden, Brill, 2007).
Stephen Gilmore is Lecturer in Family Law at King’s College London. He is particularly interested in the law on parental responsibility and the resolution of parental disputes. Recent publications include: ‘Contact/Shared Residence and Child Well-being: Research Evidence and its Implications for Legal Decision- Making’ (2006) 20 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 344; and ‘Disputing Contact: Challenging Some Assumptions’ [2008] 20 Child and Family Law Quarterly 285. He is currently co-authoring the third edition of Hayes and Williams: Family Law, Principles, Policy and Practice (Oxford, Oxford University Press) for publication in 2009.
Lynn Hagger is a Lecturer in Law at the University of Sheffield. Her research interests are in medical law in general and children’s issues in particular. Her publications focus on the empowerment of children through the use of human rights instruments. She is currently writing a book on this theme which is due to be published in June 2009: The Child as Vulnerable Patient: Protection and Empowerment. Her research interests have been greatly assisted by her parallel career in the NHS as a non-executive director for 20 years. She was Chairperson of the Sheffield Children’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust for nine years until January 2008. Here she established a Clinical Ethics Forum and Patients’ Advisory Group to help to ensure that ethical standards of care were offered to patients and their families.
Jonathan Herring is a Fellow in Law at Exeter College, University of Oxford. He is author of several books, including Criminal Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008); Family Law (Harlow, Pearson, 2007); Medical Law and Ethics (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008); and Criminal Law (Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2006). He has also written widely on issues relating to criminal law, family law and medical law. In 2007 he was the George P Smith Distinguished Visiting Professor-Chair at the University of Indiana. He is cur- rently working on a book on family law and human rights (with Shazia Choudhry) and a book on law and older people.
Roger Leng is Reader in Law at the University of Warwick. His work spans the fields of criminal law, evidence and procedure. He is a former editor of the International Journal of Evidence and Proof and has held consultancies with the Law Reform Commission of Canada and the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. His most recent book (with R Taylor and M Wasik) is Blackstone’s Guide to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004).
Daniel Monk is a Senior Lecturer in Law at Birkbeck College, University of London. He has published articles on various issues relating to children’s rights, education law and the sociology of childhood, and is co-author (with B Hale, D Pearl and E Cooke) of The Family, Law and Society (6th edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008). He is the co-editor (with J Bridgeman) of Feminist Perspectives on Child Law (London, Cavendish, 2000) and (with L Moran and SBeresford) of Legal Queeries (London, Cassells, 1998). He is Assistant Editor of Child and Family Law Quarterly.
Rebecca Probert is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Warwick, teaching family law and child law. She has just completed a book on the Clandestine Marriages Act of 1753—Marriage Law and Practice in the Long Eighteenth Century: A Reassessment—which is due to be published by Cambridge University Press in 2009. She is also co-author (with J Masson and R Bailey-Harris) of Cretney: Principles of Family Law (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2008), editor of Family Life and the Law: Under One Roof (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2007) and co-editor (with Jo Miles) of Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets: An inter-disciplinary study (Oxford, Hart, 2009).
Helen Reece is a Reader in Law at Birkbeck College, University of London. Her current research interests include conceptions of responsibility in the context of the family. She is the author of Divorcing Responsibly (Oxford, Hart, 2003). Other recent publications include ‘From Parental Responsibility to Parenting Responsi- bly’ in Michael Freeman (ed), Law and Sociology: Current Legal Issues (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006) and ‘The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Depend- ency’ (Review article) [2008] 20 Child and Family Law Quarterly 109.
Caroline Sawyer is Reader in Law at Oxford Brookes University. Her research interests include issues of legal competence and legal personality, especially of children and non-nationals. She is currently working on statelessness and British citizenship as well as the legal status of children.
Jens M Scherpe is a Fellow of Gonville and Caius College Cambridge, and a University Lecturer in Law at the University of Cambridge, where he teaches comparative law and family law. Previously he was Research Fellow and Head of the Department for the Law of the Nordic Countries at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and Private International Law in Hamburg. He is a member of the International Advisory Board of the Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht (FamRZ) and member of the Wissenschaftliche Vereinigung für Familienrecht eV.
Rachel Taylor is Penningtons Tutor in Law at Christ Church, University of Oxford. Her research interests are in Family Law and Human Rights Law. Recent publications include: ‘Reversing the Retreat from Gillick? R (Axon) v Secretary of State for Health’ [2007] 19 Child and Family Law Quarterly 81 and (with Jonathan Herring) ‘Relocating Relocation’ [2006] 18 Child and Family Law Quarterly 517.
Julie Wallbank is a Senior Lecturer in Law at the School of Law, University of Leeds. Her areas of expertise and research interests are family law, feminist legal theory and gender and the law. She has written widely on gendered aspects of family law, including the regulation of reproductive technologies, child support and contact.
Nick Wikeley has been a Judge of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal since November 2008 and is an Emeritus Professor at the University of Southampton. His books include Child Support in Action (Oxford, Hart, 1998), with Gwynn Davis and Richard Young) and Child Support Law and Policy (Oxford, Hart, 2006). He was one of the authors of the report on the ‘Relationship breakdown and child support study’ (DWP Research Report No 503, 2008).
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书最让我感到惊喜的是其国际化和普世性的视角。作者似乎有意避开了对某一特定文化或社会经济背景的过度依赖,而是着眼于人类作为父母的共同处境和基本需求。在探讨“榜样力量”时,书中引用了不同历史时期和文化背景下的家庭故事,这使得书中的建议听起来更加坚实和具有跨越性的意义。我发现,无论我是在为自己设定目标,还是在处理孩子与外部世界的互动时,这本书提供的参照系都是广阔而包容的。它没有贩卖一种“完美父母”的虚假画像,相反,它坦诚地展示了为人父母的脆弱性、矛盾性和不断学习的过程。这种真诚,加上其理论的深度和实践的广度,使得这本书超越了一般的育儿指南,更像是一部关于如何成为一个更有责任感、更完整的人的指南。它真正做到了提升读者的认知水平,而非仅仅提供临时的安慰剂。
评分这本书的叙事风格有一种奇特的、近乎散文诗般的节奏感,尤其是在描述为人父母过程中那些细微、转瞬即逝的瞬间时。它并非传统意义上的工具书,更像是一部关于“在场感”的哲学沉思录。我尤其被其中几段关于“倾听沉默”的描述所打动。作者笔下的亲子互动,不再是关于教导或纠正,而是关于一种深层次的共振——如何真正地进入孩子的经验世界,即使他们还无法用语言表达。这种对“非语言交流”的细腻捕捉,让我开始留意到家庭日常中那些被我们匆忙忽略的微小信号。这本书的语言是优雅的,它避免了过于口语化的表达,保持了一种知识分子的克制,却又在关键时刻爆发出直击人心的洞察力。阅读它,就像是进行了一次深度的冥想,迫使你放慢呼吸,去感知生命流动的真实频率,而不是被外部世界的喧嚣所裹挟。
评分我非常欣赏作者在行文过程中所展现出的那种近乎临床学家的冷静与客观。在处理诸如“代际创伤传递”这样敏感且容易引发防御机制的话题时,本书并没有采取指责或评判的姿态,反而提供了一套严谨的分析框架。我记得有一章详细解析了“不安全依恋模式”对孩子未来人际关系的影响,作者引用了大量跨学科的理论支持,从发展心理学到神经科学,构建了一个非常扎实的论据体系。这种基于实证的叙述方式,极大地增强了文本的可信度。对于我这样一个偏好逻辑和结构的人来说,这种层层递进的论证过程,读起来酣畅淋漓。它没有使用太多煽情或过度情绪化的语言,而是通过清晰的因果关系链,让读者自己得出结论:改变,必须从理解“为什么会这样”开始。这种不容置疑的深度,使得这本书脱颖而出,它不是在安慰你,而是在教你如何构建一个更坚固的内在支柱,以便更好地应对养育过程中的不确定性。
评分这本书的封面设计给我留下了极为深刻的印象,它采用了一种低调而沉稳的色调,仿佛预示着内容本身会是严肃而富有洞察力的。我最初翻阅的动机,是希望能在快节奏的现代生活中,找到一些关于如何平衡个人成长与家庭责任的实用指南。然而,这本书真正吸引我的地方,却在于它对“责任”这个概念的哲学性探讨。作者似乎没有急于提供具体的“操作手册”,而是将焦点放在了父母内心世界的构建上。那些关于自我认知、情绪管理以及如何在不牺牲自我完整性的前提下,成为一个稳定支持系统的段落,读起来简直像是对我多年来内心挣扎的精准描绘。特别是其中关于“有界限的爱”的论述,让我开始重新审视自己过去过于溺爱或过度控制的倾向。它不像市面上那些充斥着积极心理学口号的书籍那样肤浅,而是深入到行为背后的动机分析,迫使读者进行深刻的自我反思。阅读过程中,我经常需要停下来,合上书本,在安静中消化这些复杂的思想。这种需要投入精力的阅读体验,恰恰说明了作者文字的厚重感和持久的影响力,它不是那种读完就忘的快餐读物,而是会长期驻留在你思维结构中的基石。
评分从结构上讲,这本书的布局非常巧妙,它没有按照“婴儿期、幼儿期、青少年期”这样的时间轴来划分内容,而是选择了以“核心挑战”为主题进行组织,比如“处理冲突的艺术”、“培养韧性的土壤”、“界限的建立与重塑”等。这种主题式的划分,极大地提高了内容的应用价值。这意味着,无论我正处于孩子成长的哪个阶段,都可以快速定位到与我当前困境最相关的那一部分进行深入阅读和反思。我发现,作者在处理“冲突”这一章节时,提出了一种“共同解决者”而非“裁判者”的视角,这彻底颠覆了我过去处理家庭争执的模式。这种模式的转换,需要大量的练习和心理准备,而这本书提供的理论框架和案例分析,恰好充当了最好的预备训练场。它教会我,真正的育儿智慧,不在于避免所有冲突,而在于如何将每一次冲突转化为双方成长的契机。
评分豆瓣收书还蛮强大的&_&
评分豆瓣收书还蛮强大的&_&
评分豆瓣收书还蛮强大的&_&
评分豆瓣收书还蛮强大的&_&
评分豆瓣收书还蛮强大的&_&
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有