During the 1980s and 1990s, Brazil struggled to rebuild its democracy after twenty years of military dictatorship, experiencing financial crises, corruption scandals, political protest, and intense electoral contention. In the midst of this turmoil, Ann Mische argues in this remarkable book, youth activists of various stripes played a vital and unrecognized role, contributing new forms of political talk and action to Brazil's emerging democracy. Drawing upon extensive and rich ethnography as well as formal network analysis, Mische tracks the lives of young activists through intersecting political networks, including student movements, church-based activism, political parties, nongovernmental organizations, and business and professional organizations. She probes the problems and possibilities they encountered in combining partisan activism with other kinds of civic involvement. In documenting activists' struggles to develop cross-partisan publics of various kinds, Mische explores the distinct styles of communication and leadership that emerged across organizations and among individuals. Drawing on the ideas of Habermas, Gramsci, Dewey, and Machiavelli, "Partisan Publics" highlights political communication styles and the forms of mediation and leadership they give rise to - for democratic politics in Brazil and elsewhere. Insightful in its discussion of culture, methodology, and theory, "Partisan Publics" argues that partisanship can play a significant role in civic life, helping to build relations and institutions in an emerging democracy.
評分
評分
評分
評分
還是有些啓發的。對public sphere的分類,強調閤作與抗爭、意識與行動未必是二元對立的關係,所有類型都有可能有好有壞。前半部分其實並不像有人標簽裏寫的是“網絡分析”,而是對活動傢個人曆史和組織從屬的描述。概念化程度是比較弱的,但不失為有效的可視化工具。
评分還是有些啓發的。對public sphere的分類,強調閤作與抗爭、意識與行動未必是二元對立的關係,所有類型都有可能有好有壞。前半部分其實並不像有人標簽裏寫的是“網絡分析”,而是對活動傢個人曆史和組織從屬的描述。概念化程度是比較弱的,但不失為有效的可視化工具。
评分還是有些啓發的。對public sphere的分類,強調閤作與抗爭、意識與行動未必是二元對立的關係,所有類型都有可能有好有壞。前半部分其實並不像有人標簽裏寫的是“網絡分析”,而是對活動傢個人曆史和組織從屬的描述。概念化程度是比較弱的,但不失為有效的可視化工具。
评分還是有些啓發的。對public sphere的分類,強調閤作與抗爭、意識與行動未必是二元對立的關係,所有類型都有可能有好有壞。前半部分其實並不像有人標簽裏寫的是“網絡分析”,而是對活動傢個人曆史和組織從屬的描述。概念化程度是比較弱的,但不失為有效的可視化工具。
评分還是有些啓發的。對public sphere的分類,強調閤作與抗爭、意識與行動未必是二元對立的關係,所有類型都有可能有好有壞。前半部分其實並不像有人標簽裏寫的是“網絡分析”,而是對活動傢個人曆史和組織從屬的描述。概念化程度是比較弱的,但不失為有效的可視化工具。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有