圖書標籤: 年鑒學派  史學理論  費弗爾  新文化史  文化研究  好看  史學史  史學   

喜歡 The Annales School 的讀者還喜歡

作者四十多年一直在《年鑒》編委會任職。不同於以往關於年鑒學派的介紹書籍（如Peter Burke和Francois Dosse)，這個真正算得上是圈內人的自我認知，似乎更有權威性吧。 實在是讀不懂第六章。對著法文讀，也讀不通。他到底要錶達什麼中心觀點？

An instrumental abstraction of my understanding of the Annales School approach of history (of meanings and believes): a. to socialize and historicize Kant's a priori form of cognition b: to use this socialized and historicized a priori form to fix Descartes' the mind/body, spiritual/ material dichotomies c: to explain individual from collective

作者四十多年一直在《年鑒》編委會任職。不同於以往關於年鑒學派的介紹書籍（如Peter Burke和Francois Dosse)，這個真正算得上是圈內人的自我認知，似乎更有權威性吧。 實在是讀不懂第六章。對著法文讀，也讀不通。他到底要錶達什麼中心觀點？

補標。其實我更期待的是他黑布羅代爾，拉布魯斯畢竟有點像外人。

An instrumental abstraction of my understanding of the Annales School approach of history (of meanings and believes): a. to socialize and historicize Kant's a priori form of cognition b: to use this socialized and historicized a priori form to fix Descartes' the mind/body, spiritual/ material dichotomies c: to explain individual from collective