圖書標籤: 建築理論  ColinRowe   

喜歡 Collage City (Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur) (German Edition) 的讀者還喜歡

In the course of his brilliant and very influential academic career he focused on developing an alternative method of urban design derived in part from the earlier work of Camillo Sitte but largely original, and based on the making of cities through a process of collaged, superimposed pieces; 推薦先讀這本書http://book.douban.com/subject/4795922/

In the course of his brilliant and very influential academic career he focused on developing an alternative method of urban design derived in part from the earlier work of Camillo Sitte but largely original, and based on the making of cities through a process of collaged, superimposed pieces; 推薦先讀這本書http://book.douban.com/subject/4795922/

In the course of his brilliant and very influential academic career he focused on developing an alternative method of urban design derived in part from the earlier work of Camillo Sitte but largely original, and based on the making of cities through a process of collaged, superimposed pieces; 推薦先讀這本書http://book.douban.com/subject/4795922/

In the course of his brilliant and very influential academic career he focused on developing an alternative method of urban design derived in part from the earlier work of Camillo Sitte but largely original, and based on the making of cities through a process of collaged, superimposed pieces; 推薦先讀這本書http://book.douban.com/subject/4795922/

In the course of his brilliant and very influential academic career he focused on developing an alternative method of urban design derived in part from the earlier work of Camillo Sitte but largely original, and based on the making of cities through a process of collaged, superimposed pieces; 推薦先讀這本書http://book.douban.com/subject/4795922/

《拼贴城市》，似乎拿起这本书来读就觉得沉甸甸的，想写点什么更是需要鼓起勇气。 “晦涩，实在是晦涩”，这个大概是大多数人读完之后的感慨，当然我也是这么觉得的，不得不承认自己浅薄的知识积淀。但是对这样一本还是决定思考些什么，也算对得起作者写书的良苦用心。...  

五年前就读了中译本，译者很努力但是无法掩盖翻译的拙劣。最近用两个月零零星星的时间读英文原版，读到了80%。也很吃力，其间翻阅字典无数，求证其他文献无数。原版中也有很多不明了的地方，甚至不乏印刷错误，但是确实解答了很多中译本无法回答的问题。这是一部对西方城市主义...  

我只能说,在我忍着要吐血的冲动,坚持翻完这本书时候,我突然明白一件事,那就是我16年的语文白学了.话说同样的道理,要不要讲的这么晦涩,我接着吐血去了.....  

五年前就读了中译本，译者很努力但是无法掩盖翻译的拙劣。最近用两个月零零星星的时间读英文原版，读到了80%。也很吃力，其间翻阅字典无数，求证其他文献无数。原版中也有很多不明了的地方，甚至不乏印刷错误，但是确实解答了很多中译本无法回答的问题。这是一部对西方城市主义...  

评价很差。 我不敢对作者这么评价，是对翻译的评价。我没看过原文，为什么胆敢评价翻译呢？ 我相信译者前言里面说的：原文长句子很多，跳跃很大，并且需要广阔的知识基础，才能理解。但是，这些翻译成汉字的“文句”（如果也能叫文句的话)没有可读性。如果按照翻译的“信、雅、...