<div>PREFACE</div>
<p> </p>
<div>This book is not about education. It is about an economic transformation</div>
<p> </p>
<div>that is being driven by an implacable technological revolution. It is not</div>
<p> </p>
<div>about saving schools, or improving schools, or reforming schools, or even</div>
<p> </p>
<div>reinventing schools--it's about removing altogether the increasingly</div>
<p> </p>
<div>costly barrier schooling poses to economic and social progress.</div>
<p> </p>
<div> This book is not written for educators or academicians. Rather, it speaks</div>
<p> </p>
<div>to the interests of businesspeople, entrepreneurs, investors, workers, politi-</div>
<p> </p>
<div>cal leaders, consumer advocates, scientists, engineers, parents, learners of</div>
<p> </p>
<div>all ages, and most especially taxpayers--the consumers who pay the bills for</div>
<p> </p>
<div>services and products that are supposed to nurture learning. And while my</div>
<p> </p>
<div>own knowledge and experience necessarily give this book a U.S. focus, the</div>
<p> </p>
<div>trends and issues it describes are global, affecting all other nations, perhaps</div>
<p> </p>
<div>in different ways, but with no less profound impact.</div>
<p> </p>
<div> While the actual writing of this book began in the spring of 1991, the</div>
<p> </p>
<div>work that went into its creation stretches back over more than twenty years.</div>
<p> </p>
<div>If there was a starting point for this effort, it probably was sometime during</div>
<p> </p>
<div>1968-69 when I was working as a high school physics teacher in my home-</div>
<p> </p>
<div>town of Mount Vernon, New York. My struggle during that year to serve the</div>
<p> </p>
<div>needs of young learners while in continual combat with the mind-killing</div>
<p> </p>
<div>mandates of a corrupt education bureaucracy galvanized my disdain for the</div>
<p> </p>
<div>academic establishment much as similar experiences did for other apostate<br />
<div> teachers and writers such as John Holt, Jonathan Kozol, and Pat C~</div>
<br />
<div> Unlike others who channeled their disaffection into calls for "r</div>
<br />
<div> by 1970 I was convinced that the education system could not be a</div>
<br />
<div> but needed to be entirely replaced by a new mechanism more att</div>
<br />
<div> the technology and social fabric of the modern world. This conclus</div>
<br />
<div> nurtured by many sources, but especially influential were the</div>
<br />
<div> B. F. Skinner, George Leonard, and Jay Forrester.</div>
<br />
<div> The work of Skinner and his disciples showed that the proc~</div>
<br />
<div> learning could be analyzed, understood, and organized to serve the</div>
<br />
<div> ua! learner's needs in a way that made boredom, frustration, hum</div>
<br />
<div> and failure unnecessary.</div>
<br />
<div> In his 1968 book, Education and Ecstasy, Leonard portrayed</div>
<br />
<div> of high-tech learning that bore no resemblance to traditional sct</div>
<br />
<div> But neither then nor since have Leonard or most other utopian "r</div>
<br />
<div> tors" of education understood the basic economic and political</div>
<br />
<div> needed to translate their dreams into reality.</div>
<br />
<div> In his 1960s work on industrial dynamics and urban dynamics,</div>
<br />
<div> as later work in the field of "system dynamics" he helped create, J</div>
<br />
<div> rester showed that even modestly complex social systems strongly</div>
<br />
<div> behave in ways he called "counterintuitive," that is, contrary to wh~</div>
<br />
<div> mon sense presumes is obvious. One result is that most attempts to</div>
<br />
<div>the behavior of social systems turn out to be either impotent or "co</div>
<br />
<div>productive," making worse what they aimed to make better. Thus</div>
<br />
<div>seen welfare programs that have shattered families and inflamed p</div>
<br />
<div>real estate subsidies that spawned financial collapse, post-Watergate</div>
<br />
<div>cal reforms that have made political corruption epidemic. And near</div>
<br />
<div>a century of American education reform has yielded an academic es~</div>
<br />
<div>ment as greedily entrenched as ever, but whose obsolescence and</div>
<br />
<div>irrelevancy have soared along with its skyrocketing cost.</div>
<br />
<div> Inspired by such ideas, I returned to Harvard in 1970 and spent th</div>
<br />
<div>three years in an intense and largely independent study of most of tl</div>
<br />
<div>questions that underlie this book: What is learning and how does it</div>
<br />
<div>What technologies can facilitate learning, and how do they work? Ho~</div>
<br />
<div>learning fit in with the overall processes of human economy and ec,</div>
<br />
<div>And most important, how do you transform or replace established h</div>
<br />
<div>institutions? Of the several Harvard and MIT faculty who contributed</div>
<br />
<div>exploration of these questions, I particularly benefited from the aid al</div>
<br />
<div>couragement of Wassily Leontief, Harvey Liebenstein, Jay Forrester.......</div>
</div>
评分
评分
评分
评分
坦白说,这本书的题材可能不算新颖,但作者的处理角度却极其刁钻和出乎意料。他似乎对人类情感光谱中的灰色地带有着近乎偏执的探索欲,毫不回避那些复杂、矛盾、甚至有些“不讨喜”的人性侧面。书中对于“选择”与“后果”之间的辩证关系进行了极其深刻的探讨,每一个角色似乎都在人生的十字路口做出过重大的决定,而这些决定所带来的连锁反应,影响了他们此后的每一步。我喜欢那种作者赋予笔下人物的韧性,即使身处绝境,他们也总能找到一种微弱但坚定的力量支撑自己前行。书中对环境的描绘也极为出色,那种冷峻、甚至略带荒凉感的布景,完美地衬托了人物内心的挣扎与疏离感。我甚至觉得,那些建筑物、街道本身,都成了故事的参与者,它们见证了一切,却保持着冰冷的沉默。这种对环境与心境的完美融合,让整部作品的基调显得既忧郁又充满哲思,是那种读完后会让人反思自身处境的佳作。
评分这本书的叙事节奏简直像是夏日午后慵懒的微风,轻轻拂过心头,却又在不经意间掀起了阵阵涟漪。作者对于人物内心的细腻捕捉,让人在阅读的过程中,仿佛能真切地感受到主角们每一个细微的情绪波动。我尤其欣赏的是那种对日常琐事的描摹,它们并非流水账式的记录,而是被赋予了某种诗意的光泽,让那些看似平凡的场景焕发出别样的生命力。比如,书中对某个傍晚,光线如何穿过老旧的百叶窗,在地板上投下斑驳光影的描写,那种氛围感十足的笔触,简直让人忍不住停下来,细细品味。故事情节的推进,也处理得相当巧妙,它并非那种大开大合、戏剧冲突强烈的类型,而更像是一部缓缓展开的画卷,在恰到好处的时机抛出一些令人深思的线索,引导着读者自己去拼凑和解读,极大地增强了阅读的参与感和探索欲。语言风格上,它有一种返璞归真的质感,没有过多华丽的辞藻堆砌,却字字珠玑,精准到位,每一次阅读都能发现一些之前忽略掉的、隐藏在文字背后的深层含义。总而言之,这是一部需要慢慢品读,才能体会其韵味的上乘之作,它提供的不仅仅是一个故事,更是一种沉浸式的体验。
评分这本书的阅读体验是极其独特的,它打破了我对传统小说叙事结构的固有认知。作者似乎更关注的是“体验”本身,而不是事件的线性发展。你可以把这本书想象成一个巨大的、由无数碎片化记忆和感官碎片构成的马赛克。有些段落的描写,比如对某种特定气味或声音的捕捉,极其精准和感性,甚至让你怀疑作者是不是偷窥了我的某段记忆。它有一种迷幻的质感,将现实的坚硬外壳剥开,让我们窥见其下流淌着的、混乱而又美丽的意识洪流。对于情节的期待感在这里变得无关紧要,真正重要的是沉浸在每一个当下被创造出来的瞬间里。我喜欢作者敢于在关键时刻使用大量的内心独白和意识流,这让故事的层次一下子丰富了起来,从外部世界的冲突瞬间转入到人物精神深处的交战。这种阅读上的“挑战性”并非令人沮丧,反而是极其令人兴奋的,因为它要求读者必须全神贯注,跟上作者那跳跃的思维节奏。读完后,我感觉自己的思维也变得更加灵活和开放了。
评分这本书的对话功力,绝对是教科书级别的。我常常会忍不住大声朗读出一些片段,因为那些人物的交谈,太真实、太有生活质感了。他们说话的方式,那种特有的口音和俚语的运用,简直就是一场语言的盛宴,让人感觉自己就坐在他们身边,听着他们吐露心声。作者在塑造群像方面展现了惊人的天赋,即便是出场不多的配角,也都立体得仿佛真实存在过,有着自己完整的人生轨迹和难以言说的苦衷。这种对“人”的深刻洞察,是许多小说难以企及的高度。而且,作者似乎深谙“秀”而非“说”的写作要点,他从不直接告诉我们某人有多么悲伤或愤怒,而是通过他如何拿起那只空杯子,如何笨拙地系上鞋带,来间接地展现人物的内心状态。这种高明的叙事技巧,让情绪的感染力成倍增加。我尤其欣赏作者对于“沉默”的运用,那些未说出口的话语,往往比任何激烈的言辞都更有力量,充满了张力和潜台词,让人读完后久久不能平静,反复咀嚼其中的意味。
评分读完这本厚厚的书,我的第一感觉是,作者简直是个时间旅行的魔法师。他笔下的世界,那种老旧社区特有的气味、空气中弥漫的尘土味和某种说不清道不明的怀旧气息,都被捕捉得活灵活现。我非常赞赏作者在构建世界观上的耐心与宏大视野。尽管故事看似聚焦于几个核心人物的命运纠葛,但透过他们,我们看到了一个时代的缩影,历史的重量感被巧妙地融入到日常对话和环境描写之中。尤其值得称道的是,作者处理冲突的方式,非常克制且富有张力。没有那种直白的对峙,更多的是心理层面的暗流涌动,人物之间的隔阂与理解,都在眼神的交汇和沉默之中完成了铺垫与爆发。这种“留白”的艺术,让读者得以将自己的情感投射进去,去填补那些未言明的空白。书中的结构设计也颇具巧思,非线性的叙事手法,像蛛网一样层层展开,时不时地抛出一个过去的回响,立刻让当前的困境有了更深的历史根源。这使得阅读过程充满了发现的乐趣,每一次翻页都像是解开了一个新的谜团,但谜底往往指向更深远的哲学思考。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有