From Publishers Weekly From late 1985 through much of '86, with a return trip to Nicaragua in 1988, the author, who is fluent in Spanish, wandered throughout Central America, immersing himself in the life of the region, interacting with "anyone, high or low, who cared to talk to me": government officials, revolutionaries and counter-revolutionaries, philosophers and poets, police chiefs and political prisoners, religious leaders and fellow Catholics. Sheehan's ( The Arabs, the Israelis and Kissinger ) attitude toward the church, suffering and redemption is very much in the Graham Greene tradition. Droves of homeless children, for many of whom he bought meals, populate the book ("You can't save them, but you can feed them."). A former U.S. foreign service officer with experience in Third World countries, he was unsurprised but deeply disturbed in his visits to places where "misery is the norm" and torture is "a growth industry." Nicaragua is Sheehan's special interest, although he writes illuminatingly about conditions in Guatemala and El Salvador. Arguing that the Reagan administration is guilty of war crimes against the people of Nicaragua, he describes how the Sandinistas and the contras have wrought much harm against them as well. Copyright 1989 Reed Business Information, Inc. From Library Journal After touring and interviewing in the war zones of Central America, the author offers little hope for the oppressed. Bad government is certainly not new there, but even the Communist government of Nicaragua is mild compared to the bloodthirsty regimes to its north. Who bears the blame for the mess? The author comes down hard on U.S. foreign policy, but, in the end, economic servitude to the United States becomes secondary to local misjudgment. All that Reagan's policy has really accomplished is to unite more firmly the fronts against the United States. For scholarly collections, a better book is Confronting Revolution: Security Through Diplomacy in Central America, edited by Morris Blachman and William LeoGrande (Pantheon, 1986) ; this is a good choice for general readers.- Louis Leonard, Univ. of Florida Lib., GainesvilleCopyright 1989 Reed Business Information, Inc.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的语言风格极其多变,简直像一位精通各种乐器的演奏家,时而如大提琴般低沉厚重,充满历史的沧桑感;时而又像短笛般轻快跳跃,描绘出热带雨林中生命的蓬勃生机。最让我印象深刻的是作者对自然环境的描绘,那不仅仅是简单的背景交代,简直是另一位主要角色。那种对光影、温度、湿度乃至气味的精准捕捉,构建了一个无比真实可感的物理空间。我能“闻到”雨季泥土被晒干后的那股特有的味道,能“感到”高原上夜晚突如其来的寒意,以及海边小镇特有的咸湿空气。这种高度的感官沉浸感,使得这本书的阅读过程,更像是一次强制性的感官重塑体验,让人在合上书页之后,仍需花费一段时间来适应自己所处的现实环境。
评分我必须承认,这本书在处理那些敏感的社会议题时,展现出了一种令人敬畏的克制与深刻。它没有采取那种高高在上的批判姿态,也没有流于煽情的控诉,而是选择了一种更为内敛、更为贴近个体经验的方式来呈现那些错综复杂的历史遗留问题和现实困境。作者似乎更热衷于描绘“人”在特定环境下的生存状态和道德困境,而非对宏大叙事进行简单的道德裁决。那些关于权力、贫富差距、以及文化冲突的描绘,都隐藏在一次次偶然的会面、一次次无意的交谈之中,不动声色地完成了对时代肌理的剖析。这种“于无声处听惊雷”的叙事技巧,使得那些沉重的主题反而更具穿透力,因为它迫使我们去思考,去在那些微小的生存挣扎中,寻找我们自身的影子和对世界的理解。它不是提供答案的,而是提出更深刻问题的典范之作。
评分这本书的结构安排简直是鬼斧神工,它没有采用线性的时间推进,而是像一首结构复杂的交响乐,在不同的主题和时间碎片之间进行着令人惊叹的跳跃和回旋。初读时,我甚至有些迷失在这不断闪现的片段中,仿佛置身于一场迷雾缭绕的梦境,但随着阅读的深入,我开始领悟到作者的匠心所在——每一个看似不相关的场景,最终都会在更宏大的主题下找到它精确的位置,彼此之间形成了微妙的张力与共鸣。作者似乎故意打乱了叙事的逻辑,用一种近乎意识流的方式,来模仿那些异国他乡信息过载、感官冲击带来的认知体验。这种非传统的叙事手法,无疑是对传统文学规范的一次大胆挑战,它要求读者必须付出更多的专注和心力去拼凑图像,但一旦你掌握了它的节奏,那种豁然开朗的阅读快感,是任何平铺直叙的故事都无法比拟的。它考验的不仅是作者的功力,更是读者自身的理解力和联想能力。
评分从整体的阅读体验来看,这本书无疑是极具挑战性的,但同时也是极其丰厚和有回报的。它拒绝提供廉价的情绪出口,更倾向于构建一个需要读者主动参与建构意义的复杂场域。阅读它,就像是在一个充满异域风情但又极其迷宫般的建筑中行走,你需要不断地抬头观察天花板上的雕花,低头留意脚下地板的纹理,才能最终理解这座建筑的宏伟设计和其中蕴含的哲学思辨。这本书成功地将个人化的旅行见闻,提升到了一种对人类处境和文化隔阂的哲学探讨层面。它要求读者走出舒适区,去直面那些不那么光鲜亮丽的真相,以及面对未知时,内心产生的各种微妙的疏离感和认同危机。这是一部真正有重量、能让人思考很久的作品,绝非茶余饭后的消遣读物。
评分这本书的文字仿佛是一股带着热带湿气的微风,轻柔地拂过读者的心田,却又在不经意间带来阵阵寒意。作者的叙事笔触细腻得如同中美洲午后阳光下那些斑驳的树影,每一个场景都勾勒得入木三分。我读到那些关于日常生活琐事的描摹,那些小贩的叫卖声,街角咖啡馆里弥漫的浓郁香气,以及那些在时间长河中被冲刷得有些模糊的古老传说,都让人仿佛身临其境。特别是一些人物对话的设计,简直是神来之笔,那种特有的地方口音和俚语,被作者捕捉得精准到位,读起来充满了真实的生活质感,而不是刻意为之的异域风情堆砌。这种对细节的执着,使得整个阅读体验超越了一般的游记或纪实文学,它更像是一场深入灵魂的文化探访,让我得以窥见那片土地上隐藏在喧嚣之下的深层脉络和复杂情感。那种夹杂着希望与无奈的复杂情绪,在字里行间流淌,让人掩卷之后,久久不能平息内心的波澜。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有