圖書標籤: 思想史 海外中國研究 理學 Bol 曆史 包弼德 社會史 海外漢學
发表于2025-01-23
Neo-Confucianism in History pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025
Where does Neo-Confucianism - a movement that from the twelfth to the seventeenth centuries profoundly influenced the way people understood the world and responded to it - fit into our story of China's history?This interpretive, at times polemical, inquiry into the Neo-Confucian engagement with the literati as the social and political elite, local society, and the imperial state during the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties is also a reflection on the role of the middle period in China's history. The book argues that as Neo-Confucians put their philosophy of learning into practice in local society, they justified a new social ideal in which society at the local level was led by the literati with state recognition and support. The later imperial order, in which the state accepted local elite leadership as necessary to its own existence, survived even after Neo-Confucianism lost its hold on the center of intellectual culture in the seventeenth century but continued as the foundation of local education. It is the contention of this book that Neo-Confucianism made that order possible.
包弼德(Peter K. Bol)是美國哈佛大學東亞語言與文明係的查理斯•卡威爾(Charles H. Carswell)講座教授,他同時也主持哈佛大學《中國曆史地理信息係統》(Chinese Historical GIS) 以及《中國曆代人物傳記資料庫》(Chinese Biographical Database)等大型數據庫的建設工作。其著作包括 This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China (1992,中譯本《斯文:唐宋思想的轉型》),並閤編Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics (2006) 以及Confucianism and Ecology (1998) 等書。包弼德最近十餘年的研究專注於討論理學的曆史角色,以及從地方史的視角齣發探討中國社會文化的變遷。
有傳統地在最後說瞭些我愛聽的. 三天四夜讀完.
評分老包非常謙虛,說自己隻能關注到道學如何與其身處的曆史變遷相關聯,不能展開講道學本身的理論體係。成書的結果卻是兩方麵都做的很完備。引人深思處在其對道學作為思潮、身份、社會運動的三分,以及思想體係本身的命運與其內在不協同所産生的的張力間的微妙互動。 作者的學養沒得說,很多近在咫尺的推論、輕薄賣弄的類比,基本不碰。
評分Below my expectation. descriptive rather than argumentative
評分把理學的産生置於唐宋變革的社會背景下來考察,指齣是對王安石新法的反動。
評分感覺是為普知大眾而寫。不過角度很新穎: neoconfunianism is not a philosophy , instead, it was more like a intellectual movement
这本书的一个特别之处是在附录里添加了一份对于本书的书评及作者的回应。许齐雄和王昌伟在检讨了北美学界近五十年的宋明理学研究之后,指出哲学的(以狄百瑞为中心)和历史的(以余英时为代表)这两种研究路径先天就有不可避免的缺陷,前者是脱离了具体时空的种种概念的无头回...
評分Taizong (r. 976-97), turned their attention to state building: defining the border, controlling independent military governors, recruiting civil administrators, regularizing tax collection and military provisioning, and re-establishing a national legal syst...
評分《历史上的理学》是第一部在公元11世纪至17世纪的政治、经济、社会和文化变迁的大背景下,详细地阐释理学的萌发、兴盛和末落的著作。 包弼德教授在进行这项研究方面具有得天独厚的优势。他对于中国政治史和社会经济史领域的前沿进展有深透的了解。他严谨地将理学界定为一种道德...
評分 評分包弼德在此书中试图通过构筑塑造理学的社会历史背景来理解理学发生与发展的机理,并不拘泥于将理学视作一种对人生与秩序进行终极追问的哲学理路。本书从以下几方面展开论述。 理学产生的历史社会背景 与唐朝相比,中国政治社会在宋朝呈现了完全不一样的面目,有几...
Neo-Confucianism in History pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025