Constitutional change, seemingly so orderly, formal, and refined, has in fact been a revolutionary process from the first, as Bruce Ackerman makes clear in We the People: Transformations. The Founding Fathers, hardly the genteel conservatives of myth, set America on a remarkable course of revolutionary disruption and constitutional creativity that endures to this day. After the bloody sacrifices of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party revolutionized the traditional system of constitutional amendment as they put principles of liberty and equality into higher law. Another wrenching transformation occurred during the Great Depression, when Franklin Roosevelt and his New Dealers vindicated a new vision of activist government against an assault by the Supreme Court.
These are the crucial episodes in American constitutional history that Ackerman takes up in this second volume of a trilogy hailed as "one of the most important contributions to American constitutional thought in the last half-century" (Cass Sunstein, New Republic). In each case he shows how the American people--whether led by the Founding Federalists or the Lincoln Republicans or the Roosevelt Democrats--have confronted the Constitution in its moments of great crisis with dramatic acts of upheaval, always in the name of popular sovereignty. A thoroughly new way of understanding constitutional development, We the People: Transformations reveals how America's "dualist democracy" provides for these populist upheavals that amend the Constitution, often without formalities.
The book also sets contemporary events, such as the Reagan Revolution and Roe v. Wade, in deeper constitutional perspective. In this context Ackerman exposes basic constitutional problems inherited from the New Deal Revolution and exacerbated by the Reagan Revolution, then considers the fundamental reforms that might resolve them. A bold challenge to formalist and fundamentalist views, this volume demonstrates that ongoing struggle over America's national identity, rather than consensus, marks its constitutional history.
Bruce Ackerman is Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, and the author of fifteen books that have had a broad influence in political philosophy, constitutional law, and public policy. His major works include Social Justice in the Liberal State and his multivolume constitutional history, We the People. His most recent books are The Failure of the Founding Fathers (2005) and Before the Next Attack (2006). His book, The Stakeholder Society (with Anne Alstott), served as a basis for Tony Blair’s recent introduction of child investment accounts in the United Kingdom. Professor Ackerman is a member of the American Law Institute and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He is a Commander of the French Order of Merit, and the recipient of the American Philosophical Society’s Henry Phillips Prize for Lifetime Achievement in Jurisprudence. He received his B.A. from Harvard University and his LL.B from Yale Law School.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的结构安排,简直可以作为学术写作的典范。它不是线性叙事,更像是一座层层递进的知识金字塔。开篇部分似乎是打地基,奠定了基础的概念框架和历史背景,但内容并不显得单薄,反而为后续的深入探讨蓄足了能量。然后,作者开始逐层向上搭建,每上一层楼,视野就开阔一分,讨论的深度也随之增加。最让我感到震撼的是其中关于“理想与现实的张力”的处理。作者没有将这些政治理想描绘成乌托邦式的完美蓝图,而是毫不留情地揭示了在具体执行层面,理想是如何被各种现实的妥协、人性的弱点以及环境的限制所扭曲、所修正的。他没有回避矛盾,反而将这些“裂痕”作为研究的核心对象。这种务实到近乎冷酷的分析,极大地增强了这本书的说服力。它告诉你,真正的伟大并非在于设计出完美的方案,而在于如何在充满缺陷的世界中,找到最接近完善的那个“可行”路径。阅读过程中,我深刻感受到作者对人类复杂性的深刻理解,那是一种带着悲悯和清醒的洞察力。
评分说实话,这本书放在我的书架上已经有一段时间了,一直因为其篇幅和名声望而有些敬而远之。它给人的第一印象,确实是那种“大学教材”式的严肃和权威。但真正开始阅读后,我发现它远非冰冷的理论堆砌。作者在某些章节,尤其是在讲述特定历史事件的背景时,展现出了令人惊喜的叙事天赋。他能够将复杂的制度变迁,描绘成一幅幅波澜壮阔的画卷。比如,对于某个关键时刻的描述,他会精准地捕捉到环境的氛围、人物的微妙情绪,并用富有画面感的语言将其串联起来。这使得即便是对政治史不太感兴趣的读者,也能被故事本身所吸引。这种将严谨的学术探讨与引人入胜的叙事手法巧妙结合的能力,是这本书最令人称道之处。它成功地跨越了专业壁垒,让更广泛的公众能够接触并理解这些关乎社会根基的重大议题。我读完后最大的感受是,这不是一本“应该”读的书,而是你会“渴望”去读完的书,因为它不仅提供了知识,更提供了一种理解世界运行的全新视角,让人读后久久不能平静。
评分这本书的语言风格,我个人觉得非常具有时代感,它不像当代畅销书那样追求简洁明快、直击人心的口号式表达,反而保留了一种古典的韵味。句子结构相对复杂,常常使用从句和复杂的修饰语,初读时可能会觉得略显迂回。然而,一旦适应了这种节奏,你会发现,这种“迂回”正是为了表达那种深层次的、多维度的复杂性。作者似乎非常注重语意的精确性,每一个词的选择都经过了深思熟虑,很少有可以被轻易替代的词汇。我尤其欣赏他在引用和阐述早期思想家观点时的态度——那种既充分尊重原文的精髓,又巧妙地将其融入自身论证体系的能力。这使得整本书读起来,既有历史的厚重感,又不失现代的批判视角。它不是简单地复述历史,而是在与历史进行一场跨越时空的对话。在阅读过程中,我时常会停下来,回味某一句措辞精妙的总结,或是某个比喻的恰到好处。这种阅读的“慢”感,恰恰是沉浸式体验历史和思想精粹所必需的仪式。它要求读者放慢脚步,去欣赏语言所能承载的重量。
评分这本书,初捧卷,那股沉甸甸的纸张气息混合着油墨的微涩,瞬间把我拉回了某个旧书店的角落,空气中弥漫着时光的味道。书脊上的字体设计,说不上多么华丽,却透着一股不容置疑的庄重感,仿佛在无声地宣告着其内容的份量。我特意选了一个安静的下午,关掉手机,就着窗边斜洒进来的光线,慢慢翻开了扉页。扉页的设计简洁到近乎朴素,没有任何多余的装饰,只有最核心的标题和作者署名,这种克制,反而让人对内文产生了极大的好奇和敬畏。初读几章,那种扑面而来的历史的厚重感几乎要把人淹没。作者的笔触极其细腻,仿佛拿着一把手术刀,一丝不苟地解剖着那些宏大的概念,将其还原为无数个鲜活的、有血有肉的瞬间。他没有采取那种高高在上的说教口吻,而是像一位经验丰富的智者,耐心地引导着读者一步步穿过迷雾。尤其是关于早期思想交锋的那几段论述,那些政治家们激烈的辩论,那些充满火药味的信件往来,被描绘得栩栩如生,让人仿佛身临其境,听到了历史的回响。我甚至能想象出那些争论者们紧锁的眉头和挥舞的拳头。这种叙事方式,成功地将原本枯燥的政治哲学提升到了文学的高度,读起来,酣畅淋漓,令人欲罢不能。
评分坦率地说,这本书的阅读体验,更像是一场漫长而艰苦的智力攀登。我并非专业人士,初接触某些概念时,确实感到吃力,有些段落我需要反复阅读,甚至需要借助其他资料来辅助理解。但正是这种挑战性,让我体会到了一种久违的充实感。作者在构建其论证体系时,其逻辑的严密性几乎是无懈可击的,每一个论点都像是经过精密计算的齿轮,咬合得天衣无缝,推动着整个理论框架向前运转。他没有给我们提供简单的答案,而是提供了一套极其精妙的思考工具。尤其是在探讨权力制衡的那一章,作者对不同权力结构之间的相互制约和微妙平衡进行了近乎微观层面的分析,让人不禁感叹,构建一个稳定而公正的社会框架,是何等复杂而精妙的艺术。读完这一部分,我合上书本,沉默了很久,脑海中不断回响着那些关于“约束”与“自由”的辩证关系。这本书迫使你跳出日常的惯性思维,去审视那些我们习以为常的社会运作底层逻辑。它的价值不在于它“告诉”了你什么,而在于它“教会”了你如何去“思考”那些最根本的问题。这绝不是一本可以轻松消遣的读物,它需要你投入时间、精力和心血,但回报是巨大的——一种对事物本质更深刻的洞察力。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有