The study of politics is itself a political act, containing little that is neutral. True, we can all agree on certain neutral facts about the structure of government and the like. However, the book that does not venture much beyond these minimal descriptions will offend few readers but also will interest few. Any determined pursuit of how and why things happen draws us into highly controversial areas. Most textbooks pretend to a neutrality they do not really possess. While claiming to be objective, they are merely conventional. They depict the status quo in implicitly accepting terms, propagating fairly orthodox notions about American politics.
For decades, mainstream political scientists and other apologists for the existing social order have tried to transform practically every deficiency in our political system into a strength. They would have us believe that the millions who are nonvoters are content with present social conditions, that high-powered lobbyists are nothing to worry about because they perform an information function vital to representative government, and that the growing concentration of executive power is a good thing because the president is democratically responsive to broad national interests. The apologists have argued that the exclusion of third parties is really for the best because too many parties (that is, more than two) would fractionalize and destabilize our political system, and besides, the major parties eventually incorporate into their platforms the positions raised by minor parties (which is news to a number of socialist parties whose views have remained unincorporated for more than a century).
Reacting to the mainstream tendency to turn every vice into a virtue, left critics of the status quo have felt compelled to turn every virtue into a vice. Thus they have argued that electoral struggle is meaningless, that our civil liberties are a charade, that federal programs for the needy are next to worthless, that reforms are mostly sops to the oppressed, and labor unions are all complacent, corrupt, and conservative. The left critics have been a much needed antidote to the happy pluralists who painted a silver lining around every murky cloud. But they were wrong in seeing no victories, no “real” progress in the democratic struggles fought and won. Democracy for the Few tries to strike a balance; it tries to explain how democracy is incongruous with modern-day capitalism and is consistently violated by a capitalist social order, and yet how democracy refuses to die and continues to fight back and even make gains despite the great odds against popular forces.
我只看了中文翻译版的(仅限大陆销售),书中原作者对各国都有研究与评论,并进行了有益的比较,但是对现存最伟大的社会主义中国在译本中根本没有涉及,这让我很奇怪,于是试图查找原文原作看个究竟。才发此评论,见谅。
评分我只看了中文翻译版的(仅限大陆销售),书中原作者对各国都有研究与评论,并进行了有益的比较,但是对现存最伟大的社会主义中国在译本中根本没有涉及,这让我很奇怪,于是试图查找原文原作看个究竟。才发此评论,见谅。
评分我只看了中文翻译版的(仅限大陆销售),书中原作者对各国都有研究与评论,并进行了有益的比较,但是对现存最伟大的社会主义中国在译本中根本没有涉及,这让我很奇怪,于是试图查找原文原作看个究竟。才发此评论,见谅。
评分我只看了中文翻译版的(仅限大陆销售),书中原作者对各国都有研究与评论,并进行了有益的比较,但是对现存最伟大的社会主义中国在译本中根本没有涉及,这让我很奇怪,于是试图查找原文原作看个究竟。才发此评论,见谅。
评分我只看了中文翻译版的(仅限大陆销售),书中原作者对各国都有研究与评论,并进行了有益的比较,但是对现存最伟大的社会主义中国在译本中根本没有涉及,这让我很奇怪,于是试图查找原文原作看个究竟。才发此评论,见谅。
坦白说,我原本对这类主题的书籍抱持着一丝警惕,担心会充斥着陈词滥调和过于理想化的口号,但这本书完全颠覆了我的预期。它没有提供廉价的答案或安慰,反而更像是一面冷峻的镜子,毫不留情地映照出现实运行的底层逻辑。作者的论证逻辑链条极其严密,每一步推导都建立在坚实的基础之上,让人几乎找不到可以质疑的漏洞。更难能可贵的是,这本书在批判既有体系的同时,展现出一种深沉的忧患意识,那种对未来走向的深切关怀,是建立在对现状透彻理解之上的,而非一时的情绪宣泄。阅读过程中,我多次停下来,思考作者提出的那些尖锐的问题,并反思自己在这个庞大系统中所处的位置。它带来的不是简单的知识积累,而是一种思维模式的重塑,一种对权力运作机制的深度洞察,非常适合那些渴望探寻事物本质的读者。
评分这本书的叙事手法简直是教科书级别的,作者对历史事件的梳理和细节的捕捉能力令人叹服。那种娓娓道来的节奏感,仿佛把我带回了那个风云变幻的时代,我能清晰地感受到每一个决策背后的权谋与挣扎。特别是在描绘关键人物的内心世界时,笔触细腻入微,没有简单地将他们塑造成绝对的善或恶,而是展现了人性的复杂与多面性。读到某些章节时,我甚至能想象出当时的场景,那种身临其境的代入感,让原本略显枯燥的理论框架瞬间变得鲜活起来。而且,作者在引用原始文献和交叉对比不同史料时展现出的严谨态度,为整本书的论证增添了毋庸置疑的权威性。这本书的价值不仅仅在于它讲述了一个故事,更在于它提供了一种看待历史的独特视角,促使读者跳出固有的思维定势,去深思那些被时间掩盖的真相。这种对历史脉络的精妙把握和对细节的执着追求,让这本书成为了我近几年阅读到的最有分量的作品之一,每次合上书本,心中都会留下长久的思考余韵。
评分初翻此书时,我原以为它会是某种标准的学术论著,充斥着晦涩的术语和僵硬的排版,但阅读体验却出乎意料的流畅和引人入胜。作者似乎深知如何通过叙事魅力来承载严肃的思想。这本书在引述他人的观点时,处理得极其艺术化,既保留了原作者的核心精神,又通过精炼的语言将其融入自己的论证体系,做到了真正的融会贯通,而非简单的堆砌。阅读过程中,我感受到的更多是一种智识上的愉悦,仿佛与一位高瞻远瞩的智者在进行一场深度对话。书中的许多洞察,都带有强烈的预见性,让人在惊叹于历史的循环往复时,也对人类社会未来的走向产生更具建设性的思考。这绝非一本可以快速浏览的书,它需要时间去消化,去回味那些掷地有声的论断,它真正做到了知识与美感的完美统一。
评分这本书的文字功底扎实得令人咋舌,它的语言风格介于古典的庄重和现代的犀利之间,形成了一种独特的阅读体验。有些句子读起来像是一首精心打磨过的散文诗,充满了韵律感和画面感,让人忍不住要反复品味其中的措辞和比喻。然而,在关键的分析段落,语言又变得极其精准和有力,像手术刀一样剖开复杂的社会结构,毫不留情地揭示出其内部的矛盾与裂痕。我尤其欣赏作者在处理宏大叙事与个体命运交织时的那种高超的平衡术。他没有沉溺于空泛的理论阐述,而是总能巧妙地将冰冷的社会学概念,通过具体人物的悲欢离合来具象化,使得抽象的社会现象变得可感、可触。这种叙事上的张弛有度,极大地提升了阅读的流畅性和愉悦感,让原本可能晦涩难懂的议题,变得平易近人,却又不失其深刻性。
评分这本书的结构设计简直是鬼斧神工,它巧妙地采用了多线索并行的叙事策略,让读者在宏观的历史背景和微观的个案研究之间自由穿梭。这种跳跃感并非混乱,而是一种刻意的引导,作者似乎在引导我们从不同的切面去理解同一个核心议题。每一次视角的转换,都带来一种豁然开朗的感觉,就像在拼凑一幅巨大的、细节丰富的马赛克。我特别喜欢作者在章节结尾设置的那些开放性思考题,它们并非要求一个标准答案,而是鼓励读者将书中的理论应用于现实生活中的观察,这种互动性极大地增强了阅读的参与感。通读下来,我感觉自己完成了一次艰苦但收获巨大的智力攀登,对很多曾经模棱两可的概念都有了清晰的界定。整体布局的精妙,体现了作者在长时间酝酿后才敢下笔的深厚功力。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有