Received an Honorable Mention for the 1990 Professional/Scholarly Publishing Division Award in the History, Government, and Political Science category given by the AAP
"Play fool, to catch wise."—proverb of Jamaican slaves Confrontations between the powerless and powerful are laden with deception—the powerless feign deference and the powerful subtly assert their mastery. Peasants, serfs, untouchables, slaves, laborers, and prisoners are not free to speak their minds in the presence of power. These subordinate groups instead create a secret discourse that represents a critique of power spoken behind the backs of the dominant. At the same time, the powerful also develop a private dialogue about practices and goals of their rule that cannot be openly avowed. In this book, renowned social scientist James C. Scott offers a penetrating discussion both of the public roles played by the powerful and powerless and the mocking, vengeful tone they display off stage—what he terms their public and hidden transcripts. Using examples from the literature, history, and politics of cultures around the world, Scott examines the many guises this interaction has taken throughout history and the tensions and contradictions it reflects. Scott describes the ideological resistance of subordinate groups—their gossip, folktales, songs, jokes, and theater—their use of anonymity and ambiguity. He also analyzes how ruling elites attempt to convey an impression of hegemony through such devices as parades, state ceremony, and rituals of subordination and apology. Finally, he identifies—with quotations that range from the recollections of American slaves to those of Russian citizens during the beginnings of Gorbachev's glasnost campaign—the political electricity generated among oppressed groups when, for the first time, the hidden transcript is spoken directly and publicly in the face of power. His landmark work will revise our understanding of subordination, resistance, hegemony, folk culture, and the ideas behind revolt.
From Yale University Press, http://yalepress.yale.edu/Yupbooks/book.asp?isbn=9780300056693
received his bachelor's degree from Williams College and his MA and PhD (1967) from Yale. He taught at the University of Wisconsin–Madison until 1976, when he returned to Yale. Now Scott is the Sterling Professor of Political Science and Professor of Anthropology and is Director of the Agrarian Studies Program. He is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, has held grants from the National Science Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Guggenheim Foundation, and has been a fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Science, Science, Technology and Society Program at M.I.T., and the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton.
His research concerns political economy, comparative agrarian societies, theories of hegemony and resistance, peasant politics, revolution, Southeast Asia, theories of class relations and anarchism. He is currently teaching Agrarian Studies and Rebellion, Resistance and Repression.
Scott lives in Connecticut, where he raises sheep.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本小说在构建其世界观时展现出了令人惊叹的细节和深度,那种浸入式的体验让人仿佛真的置身于故事的宏大叙事之中。作者对于不同文化冲突和权力结构演变的描绘,远超出了简单的善恶对立。每一个派系,即便是那些看似处于绝对优势地位的,其内部的复杂性与矛盾也如同雕塑般清晰可见。我尤其欣赏作者处理历史沉淀感的方式,历史并非仅仅是背景板,而是渗透到日常对话、建筑风格乃至人物决策中的一股无形力量。阅读过程中,我不断地被引导去思考那些被主流叙事所掩盖的边缘声音和隐秘的抵抗策略。叙事节奏的处理也极为老练,时而如同史诗般磅礴,时而又聚焦于个体命运的微观层面,这种张弛有度,使得即便是最冗长的政治辩论部分也充满了张力。书中的哲学思辨令人回味无穷,它迫使读者跳出舒适区,审视既有的认知框架,让人在合上书本之后,仍需花费时间去消化其中蕴含的深层含义。总而言之,这是一部在智识上极具挑战性、在文学手法上登峰造极的作品,适合那些追求复杂性与思想深度的读者。
评分这本书最令人称道之处,在于其对“艺术”本身在社会权力结构中角色的深刻探讨。它超越了将艺术视为单纯的装饰或宣传工具的传统视角,而是将其提升到了战略层面。那些被记录下来的歌谣、被禁止的绘画、被秘密流传的手稿,它们不再是简单的文化遗物,而是具有实实在在的颠覆性力量的武器。作者对于不同媒介如何被精英阶层利用和如何被反抗者窃取并重塑的过程,描写得丝丝入扣。我仿佛能闻到油墨的刺鼻气味,听到地下集会中低沉的吟唱声。这种对文化载体渗透性的挖掘,使得整个叙事拥有了一种独特的感官维度。读者不仅仅是在阅读一个关于政治角力的故事,更是在阅读一部关于符号学和感知控制的教科书。特别是其中对于审美体验如何被用来制造和维护等级制度的论述,极其深刻。它让我们意识到,对美的追求和对美的判断,从来都不是中立的,而是权力斗争的核心战场之一。
评分我必须承认,这本书在情感冲击力上达到了一个非常高的水准,但这种冲击并非来自传统意义上的高潮迭起,而是源于一种渗透在字里行间的、挥之不去的宿命感。那些试图挑战既定秩序的个体,他们的努力往往显得微不足道,如同螳臂当车。作者并未提供廉价的希望,角色的胜利常常是以巨大的、甚至是难以挽回的个人牺牲为代价。这种对“反抗”本身的复杂伦理观的探讨,是我认为这本书区别于其他同类作品的关键所在。它探讨的不是“如何赢”,而是“为何要坚持”,即使失败似乎是唯一的结局。这种悲剧性的美学,在某些时刻令人感到压抑,但正是这种对现实的残酷直面,赋予了那些微小反抗行为以永恒的价值。它迫使读者思考,在系统性的压迫面前,维护人性尊严本身,是否就是最大的胜利。这本书读完之后,留下的不是兴奋,而是一种深沉的、带着敬畏感的沉默。
评分我必须承认,初读这本书时,我的耐心经受了严峻的考验。它的开篇铺陈极其缓慢,充斥着大量的设定解释和似乎永无止境的人物介绍,这对于习惯了快节奏叙事的读者来说,无疑是一种挑战。然而,一旦跨越了最初的门槛,你会发现作者是用一种近乎建筑学家的精确度来搭建故事的骨架。每一个看似闲笔的段落,最终都会在后文以惊人的精确度回收呼应。我特别喜欢那种“潜流涌动”的氛围感,权力斗争不是通过爆炸性的冲突来展现,而是通过无声的眼神交流、精妙的外交辞令,以及对资源分配的微妙调整来体现的。书中的角色弧光描摹得极为真实,他们并非脸谱化的英雄或恶棍,而是被环境塑形、充满自我欺骗与脆弱性的复杂个体。那种长线布局的伏笔艺术,简直令人拍案叫绝,你会时不时地感到一种“原来如此”的恍然大悟,那是对作者高超控制力的由衷赞叹。虽然初读时略感晦涩,但坚持下去的回报是丰厚的,它给予的不仅仅是一个故事,更像是一份对特定社会运作机制的详尽田野调查报告。
评分从纯粹的文学角度来看,作者的语言风格简直是一场华丽的冒险。时而使用那种古典的、句式繁复的长难句,带着一种古老的庄重感,仿佛在阅读一部尘封的史册;时而又突然切换到极其简洁、近乎新闻报道般的冷峻笔调,来描述暴力或真相的揭露。这种风格上的巨大反差,极大地增强了阅读体验的层次感和戏剧性。人物对话的设计尤为精妙,你很少能听到角色直抒胸臆,更多的是通过那些精心构建的、充满潜台词的交流,来传递信息和情感。读起来需要极大的专注力,因为错过任何一个词的细微差别,都可能导致对人物动机的完全误判。这要求读者主动地、带着批判性地参与到文本的构建过程中。对于那些偏爱意识流和高度个人化叙事的读者来说,这本书提供了一种截然不同但同样迷人的阅读体验——一种基于严密逻辑和宏大结构之上的、智力上的愉悦。
评分一开始觉得这人故弄玄虚,最后觉得是真博学有思想深度
评分看懂了不知道有没有三分之一,太累,但是好厉害。等我变厉害了再回来重看。
评分斯科特少有的没有汉译本的一本著作,但相当有理论份量。作为紧跟着《弱者的武器》写作的书籍,二者想要回答的问题十分接近,即如何理解农民逃避式的行为。相较于前书围绕赛达卡展开的剖析,本书运用的材料极其广泛,因而分析方法基于“机制”,也着眼于“机制”。这点颇受到批评。“隐藏的文本”当然是好用的分析工具,但如何发掘“隐藏的文本”,仍然是悬而未决的问题。
评分太艰涩了
评分太艰涩了
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有