圖書標籤: 社會學 Bourdieu sociology Science Knowledge 社會學 社會理論 社會學(英文)
发表于2024-11-25
Science of Science and Reflexivity pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
Over the last four decades, the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu produced one of the most imaginative and subtle bodies of social theory of the postwar era. When he died two years ago, he was considered to be a thinker on a par with Foucault, Barthes, and Lacan--a public intellectual as influential to his generation as Sartre was to his.
"Science of Science and Reflexivity" will be welcomed as a companion volume to Bourdieu's now seminal "An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology." In this posthumous work, Bourdieu declares that science is in danger of becoming a handmaiden to biotechnology, medicine, genetic engineering, and military research--that it risks falling under the control of industrial corporations that seek to exploit it for monopolies and profit.
Science thus endangered can become detrimental to mankind. The line between pure and applied science, therefore, must be subjected to intense theoretical scrutiny. Bourdieu's goals in "Science of Science and Reflexivity" are to identify the social conditions in which science develops in order to reclaim its objectivity and to rescue it from relativism and the forces that might exploit it. In the grand tradition of scientific reflections on science, Bourdieu provides a sociological analysis of the discipline as something capable of producing transhistorical truths; he presents an incisive critique of the main currents in the study of science throughout the past half century; and he offers a spirited defense of science against encroaching political and economic forces.
A masterful summation of the principles underlying Bourdieu's oeuvre and a memoir of his own scientific journey, "Science of Science and Reflexivity" is a capstone to one of the most important and prodigious careers in the field of sociology.
皮埃爾·布爾迪厄(1930-2002),法蘭西學院院士,著名的哲學傢和社會學傢,當代法國最具國際性影響的思想者之一。
法蘭西學院最後一年的講座,讀起來沒什麼快感。
評分我覺得Bourdieu和Latour之間的辯論有很多都建立於他們對對方的誤解之上。這書我草草翻過去的,但還是很喜歡它裏麵提齣的很多問題,比如怎樣把科學研究的實踐放在社會和曆史的維度中來觀察,但同時又不陷入相對主義;再比如在認識到科學實踐在多個層麵受外力影響的前提下如何理解這個場域相對於其他場域的獨立性。我仍然不知道通過“反思”使社會學變得更科學且更有自主性是否可能,但我近來也常常去想如何在“後現代”的威脅之下去“拯救”科學的問題,所以很大程度上我們的關切還是一緻的。
評分我覺得Bourdieu和Latour之間的辯論有很多都建立於他們對對方的誤解之上。這書我草草翻過去的,但還是很喜歡它裏麵提齣的很多問題,比如怎樣把科學研究的實踐放在社會和曆史的維度中來觀察,但同時又不陷入相對主義;再比如在認識到科學實踐在多個層麵受外力影響的前提下如何理解這個場域相對於其他場域的獨立性。我仍然不知道通過“反思”使社會學變得更科學且更有自主性是否可能,但我近來也常常去想如何在“後現代”的威脅之下去“拯救”科學的問題,所以很大程度上我們的關切還是一緻的。
評分我覺得Bourdieu和Latour之間的辯論有很多都建立於他們對對方的誤解之上。這書我草草翻過去的,但還是很喜歡它裏麵提齣的很多問題,比如怎樣把科學研究的實踐放在社會和曆史的維度中來觀察,但同時又不陷入相對主義;再比如在認識到科學實踐在多個層麵受外力影響的前提下如何理解這個場域相對於其他場域的獨立性。我仍然不知道通過“反思”使社會學變得更科學且更有自主性是否可能,但我近來也常常去想如何在“後現代”的威脅之下去“拯救”科學的問題,所以很大程度上我們的關切還是一緻的。
評分法蘭西學院最後一年的講座,讀起來沒什麼快感。
評分
評分
評分
評分
Science of Science and Reflexivity pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024