圖書標籤: 現當代文學  文化研究  帝國邊緣  上海  urban   

喜歡 Shanghai and the Edges of Empires 的讀者還喜歡

Meng Yue makes an interesting and impassioned argument for what seems to be an emancipatory yet narrow (non-capitalist, non-imperial, critical of the Qing state and Western industrial/territorial encroachment) definition of "Chinese cosmopolitanism." Unfortunately, her strong immersion in primary materials and skillful combination of historical analysis with literary criticism is hurt by the poor editorial work and presentation (no Chinese glossary, for one thing) by the University of Minnesota Press.

Meng Yue makes an interesting and impassioned argument for what seems to be an emancipatory yet narrow (non-capitalist, non-imperial, critical of the Qing state and Western industrial/territorial encroachment) definition of "Chinese cosmopolitanism." Unfortunately, her strong immersion in primary materials and skillful combination of historical analysis with literary criticism is hurt by the poor editorial work and presentation (no Chinese glossary, for one thing) by the University of Minnesota Press.

Meng Yue makes an interesting and impassioned argument for what seems to be an emancipatory yet narrow (non-capitalist, non-imperial, critical of the Qing state and Western industrial/territorial encroachment) definition of "Chinese cosmopolitanism." Unfortunately, her strong immersion in primary materials and skillful combination of historical analysis with literary criticism is hurt by the poor editorial work and presentation (no Chinese glossary, for one thing) by the University of Minnesota Press.

Meng Yue makes an interesting and impassioned argument for what seems to be an emancipatory yet narrow (non-capitalist, non-imperial, critical of the Qing state and Western industrial/territorial encroachment) definition of "Chinese cosmopolitanism." Unfortunately, her strong immersion in primary materials and skillful combination of historical analysis with literary criticism is hurt by the poor editorial work and presentation (no Chinese glossary, for one thing) by the University of Minnesota Press.

Meng Yue makes an interesting and impassioned argument for what seems to be an emancipatory yet narrow (non-capitalist, non-imperial, critical of the Qing state and Western industrial/territorial encroachment) definition of "Chinese cosmopolitanism." Unfortunately, her strong immersion in primary materials and skillful combination of historical analysis with literary criticism is hurt by the poor editorial work and presentation (no Chinese glossary, for one thing) by the University of Minnesota Press.

FACEFATE对孟书的感觉眼很毒，对孟著的缺点看得很准，这也是多数美国搞汉学的看法。从研究上海和近代中国的角度看，这本没有和其光怪陆离的李路术语成正比的学术贡献。有人曾问过孟，除了理论术语外，你和其他搞上海的不同点是什么，孟竟然打不上来。因此，除了对时尚理论...  

（mark读过是2016年4月orz……梳理一下前两个章节的线索，并向福柯的幽灵致敬） 1. 地层/断代：文化史的谱系 1）1840（冲击/回应论的史观）v.s. 1860（帝国晚期历史内部的变革逻辑） 大运河衰退，转向海路 & 太平天国动乱，使得上海取代江南成为文化再生产中心；更灵活的地...

（mark读过是2016年4月orz……梳理一下前两个章节的线索，并向福柯的幽灵致敬） 1. 地层/断代：文化史的谱系 1）1840（冲击/回应论的史观）v.s. 1860（帝国晚期历史内部的变革逻辑） 大运河衰退，转向海路 & 太平天国动乱，使得上海取代江南成为文化再生产中心；更灵活的地...

（mark读过是2016年4月orz……梳理一下前两个章节的线索，并向福柯的幽灵致敬） 1. 地层/断代：文化史的谱系 1）1840（冲击/回应论的史观）v.s. 1860（帝国晚期历史内部的变革逻辑） 大运河衰退，转向海路 & 太平天国动乱，使得上海取代江南成为文化再生产中心；更灵活的地...

（mark读过是2016年4月orz……梳理一下前两个章节的线索，并向福柯的幽灵致敬） 1. 地层/断代：文化史的谱系 1）1840（冲击/回应论的史观）v.s. 1860（帝国晚期历史内部的变革逻辑） 大运河衰退，转向海路 & 太平天国动乱，使得上海取代江南成为文化再生产中心；更灵活的地...