图书标签: 现当代文学  文化研究  帝国边缘  上海  urban   

喜欢 Shanghai and the Edges of Empires 的读者还喜欢

Meng Yue makes an interesting and impassioned argument for what seems to be an emancipatory yet narrow (non-capitalist, non-imperial, critical of the Qing state and Western industrial/territorial encroachment) definition of "Chinese cosmopolitanism." Unfortunately, her strong immersion in primary materials and skillful combination of historical analysis with literary criticism is hurt by the poor editorial work and presentation (no Chinese glossary, for one thing) by the University of Minnesota Press.

Meng Yue makes an interesting and impassioned argument for what seems to be an emancipatory yet narrow (non-capitalist, non-imperial, critical of the Qing state and Western industrial/territorial encroachment) definition of "Chinese cosmopolitanism." Unfortunately, her strong immersion in primary materials and skillful combination of historical analysis with literary criticism is hurt by the poor editorial work and presentation (no Chinese glossary, for one thing) by the University of Minnesota Press.

Meng Yue makes an interesting and impassioned argument for what seems to be an emancipatory yet narrow (non-capitalist, non-imperial, critical of the Qing state and Western industrial/territorial encroachment) definition of "Chinese cosmopolitanism." Unfortunately, her strong immersion in primary materials and skillful combination of historical analysis with literary criticism is hurt by the poor editorial work and presentation (no Chinese glossary, for one thing) by the University of Minnesota Press.

Meng Yue makes an interesting and impassioned argument for what seems to be an emancipatory yet narrow (non-capitalist, non-imperial, critical of the Qing state and Western industrial/territorial encroachment) definition of "Chinese cosmopolitanism." Unfortunately, her strong immersion in primary materials and skillful combination of historical analysis with literary criticism is hurt by the poor editorial work and presentation (no Chinese glossary, for one thing) by the University of Minnesota Press.

Meng Yue makes an interesting and impassioned argument for what seems to be an emancipatory yet narrow (non-capitalist, non-imperial, critical of the Qing state and Western industrial/territorial encroachment) definition of "Chinese cosmopolitanism." Unfortunately, her strong immersion in primary materials and skillful combination of historical analysis with literary criticism is hurt by the poor editorial work and presentation (no Chinese glossary, for one thing) by the University of Minnesota Press.

In Chapter 5, the author gives an innovative discussion of gardens in Yangzhou during the late 18th century onwards. A cheaper paperback edition of this book is also listed on douban. Readers with access to electronic libraries can also read this book usi...  

FACEFATE对孟书的感觉眼很毒，对孟著的缺点看得很准，这也是多数美国搞汉学的看法。从研究上海和近代中国的角度看，这本没有和其光怪陆离的李路术语成正比的学术贡献。有人曾问过孟，除了理论术语外，你和其他搞上海的不同点是什么，孟竟然打不上来。因此，除了对时尚理论...  

FACEFATE对孟书的感觉眼很毒，对孟著的缺点看得很准，这也是多数美国搞汉学的看法。从研究上海和近代中国的角度看，这本没有和其光怪陆离的李路术语成正比的学术贡献。有人曾问过孟，除了理论术语外，你和其他搞上海的不同点是什么，孟竟然打不上来。因此，除了对时尚理论...  

In Chapter 5, the author gives an innovative discussion of gardens in Yangzhou during the late 18th century onwards. A cheaper paperback edition of this book is also listed on douban. Readers with access to electronic libraries can also read this book usi...  

In Chapter 5, the author gives an innovative discussion of gardens in Yangzhou during the late 18th century onwards. A cheaper paperback edition of this book is also listed on douban. Readers with access to electronic libraries can also read this book usi...