In 1945, many Europeans still heated with coal, cooled their food with ice, and lacked indoor plumbing. Today, things could hardly be more different. Over the second half of the twentieth century, the average European's buying power tripled, while working hours fell by a third. The European Economy since 1945 is a broad, accessible, forthright account of the extraordinary development of Europe's economy since the end of World War II. Barry Eichengreen argues that the continent's history has been critical to its economic performance, and that it will continue to be so going forward.
Challenging standard views that basic economic forces were behind postwar Europe's success, Eichengreen shows how Western Europe in particular inherited a set of institutions singularly well suited to the economic circumstances that reigned for almost three decades. Economic growth was facilitated by solidarity-centered trade unions, cohesive employers' associations, and growth-minded governments--all legacies of Europe's earlier history. For example, these institutions worked together to mobilize savings, finance investment, and stabilize wages.
However, this inheritance of economic and social institutions that was the solution until around 1973--when Europe had to switch from growth based on brute-force investment and the acquisition of known technologies to growth based on increased efficiency and innovation--then became the problem.
Thus, the key questions for the future are whether Europe and its constituent nations can now adapt their institutions to the needs of a globalized knowledge economy, and whether in doing so, the continent's distinctive history will be an obstacle or an asset.
Barry Eichengreen is George C. Pardee and Helen N. Pardee Professor of Economics and Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley. His books include Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919-1939 and Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System (Princeton).
Reviews:
"In The European Economy Since 1945, Barry Eichengreen . . . presents not only a comprehensive account of Europe's postwar economic experience but also an important analysis of capitalist development more generally. . . . [B]y demonstrating how institutions helpful in one era can be counterproductive in another, Eichengreen has important lessons about the future to teach both policy makers and publics."--Sheri Berman, New York Times Book Review
"Eichengreen, even as he presents a lot of evidence, proves himself to be a master of exposition of the big story. And none could be bigger than the one contained in this book. History will judge it one of the most amazing achievements of the 20th century."--Huw Dixon, Times Higher Education Supplement
"This is a superb overview of a half century of European economic development."--Choice
"An excellent book. . . . I have never read a better [book] on what the European economies have done right and subsequently did wrong. . . . Eichengreen . . . believes that Europe can turn things around, without chucking the basic model, but he doesn't for a moment deny that Europe faces an economic crisis relative to the American model."--Tyler Cowen, Marginal Revolution
"A characteristic of the best histories is not just a good narrative but a compelling thread that runs through it. Barry Eichengreen's tour de force of postwar European history is that kind of book. . . . His thesis is that Europe's much maligned corporatist institutions played a significant role in achieving the postwar economic miracle, but that these institutions are insufficiently flexible to meet the 21st century's demands. . . . While there can be no such thing as a definitive history of Europe's postwar economy, Eichengreen at least comes close to providing a definitive history of European economic performance, a subject in which he excels. This is in itself no mean achievement."--Wolfgang Munchau, Financial Times
评分
评分
评分
评分
读完这本书,我最大的感受是,欧洲经济的韧性并非天生,而是源于其在面对外部冲击时所展现出的那种“结构性耐心”。作者清晰地勾勒出,从布雷顿森林体系解体到欧元区危机爆发的整个过程,欧洲各国是如何在主权国家利益和超国家经济整合之间进行微妙的、有时甚至是痛苦的拉扯。我特别关注了其中关于“欧洲货币体系(EMS)”的失败教训分析,那部分写得极为精彩,没有用简单的成败论来定性,而是深入探讨了各国央行在固定汇率制度下面临的内在政策冲突,以及这种冲突如何最终演变成结构性失衡的温床。这种不回避矛盾的写作态度,极大地增强了文本的说服力。它迫使读者去思考,当代欧洲经济面临的诸多挑战,如地缘政治压力和能源转型,其根源或许早已埋藏在过去几十年的政策选择之中。这本书提供了一个绝佳的框架,帮助我们理解当前欧洲决策者的思维惯性和路径依赖。
评分这本书的论证逻辑严密得令人称奇,尤其是对欧洲一体化进程的阐述,简直是教科书级别的范本。作者没有将“单一市场”的构建视为一个线性的、不可逆转的过程,而是将其描绘成一系列在不同国家利益集团间反复博弈、讨价还价的结果。我被书中关于“竞争政策”和“产业补贴”的章节深深吸引,这部分详尽地说明了,即便是最基础的经济规则,在付诸实践时也充满了政治的考量。例如,在描述特定国家如何利用监管套利来维持其优势产业时,那种深入到监管文本层面的分析,展现了作者深厚的学术功底。这种将宏观经济趋势与微观监管细节相结合的写法,有效地避免了对欧洲经济的扁平化解读,让读者能够清晰地看到,共同市场背后的复杂利益地图是如何被绘制和重绘的。
评分从阅读体验上来说,这本书的叙事节奏把握得非常好,它并非平铺直叙,而是充满了一种历史的宿命感。作者在回顾特定经济泡沫破裂和随后的财政紧缩时期时,那种冷静的笔触下隐藏着对决策失误的深刻反思。我尤其对书中关于“欧元区外围国家”在单一货币体系下面临的“比较优势丧失”的分析印象深刻,那部分阐释了为什么某些国家的长期竞争力会因为丧失了货币贬值这一传统工具而逐渐衰竭。这种分析的深度,远超出了对简单财政不纪律的指责,而是指向了制度设计本身的缺陷。读完后,我不得不重新审视我对“欧洲经济一体化”的固有认知,认识到这种整合本身就是一柄双刃剑,它带来了巨大的市场红利,同时也固化了某些结构性的、难以消解的区域发展不平衡。这本书成功地构建了一个既批判又富有洞察力的观察平台。
评分这本书的视角真是让人耳目一新,它没有落入那种宏大叙事的窠臼,而是将战后欧洲的经济图景分解成了一系列细致入微的案例和政策辩论。我尤其欣赏作者处理信息的方式,那种抽丝剥茧,将复杂的体制改革与普通民众的生活变化紧密联系起来的叙事技巧。比如,书中对“莱茵河模式”的剖析,不仅仅停留在教科书上那些关于合作和共决权的描述,而是深入挖掘了其在特定历史时期如何平衡了资本积累与社会公平这两个看似矛盾的目标。这种对细节的把握,使得即便是对经济史不太了解的读者,也能清晰地把握住欧洲经济体在不同阶段面临的核心张力。我发现自己忍不住去查阅了更多关于马歇尔计划实施后,各国政府在资源再分配上的具体操作细节,这本书就像一把钥匙,打开了通往更深层次理解的大门,让我明白了为什么欧洲能在短短几十年内完成如此惊人的重建和整合。它展现的不是一条平坦的增长曲线,而是一系列充满妥协、试错和关键决策的复杂历程。
评分我原本以为这是一本枯燥的经济统计数据汇编,但事实恰恰相反,作者巧妙地融入了政治经济学的视角,让历史的“温度”得以保留。书中关于社会福利体系演变的论述尤其引人入胜,它探讨了战后福利国家是如何从战后的“重建共识”逐渐演变为后期面临财政压力的“结构性负担”。作者没有简单地赞扬或批判福利制度的慷慨程度,而是着眼于其在不同经济周期中的功能性转变——从需求管理工具到社会稳定的基石,再到结构改革的阻碍。这种动态的视角,使我对德国的“哈茨改革”以及法国的养老金体系改革有了更立体化的认识。它揭示了一个核心问题:欧洲经济的内在张力往往体现在对“充分就业”和社会保障承诺之间的权衡上。阅读过程中,我感觉自己更像是在参与一场跨越半个世纪的严肃的政策辩论,而不是被动地接受结论。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有