Authoritarian Legality in China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Mary E. Gallagher

Cambridge University Press

2017-8-31

304

USD 99.99

Hardcover

9781107083776

图书标签: 政治学中国政治当代中国海外中国研究比较政治社会学法律中国研究

喜欢 Authoritarian Legality in China 的读者还喜欢

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-12-22

Authoritarian Legality in China epub 下载 mobi 下载 pdf 下载 txt 电子书下载 2024

Authoritarian Legality in China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

图书描述

Can authoritarian regimes use democratic institutions to strengthen and solidify their rule? The Chinese government has legislated some of the most protective workplace laws in the world and opened up the judicial system to adjudicate workplace conflict, emboldening China's workers to use these laws. This book examines these patterns of legal mobilization, showing which workers are likely to avail themselves of these new protections and find them effective. Gallagher finds that workers with high levels of education are far more likely to claim these new rights and be satisfied with the results. However, many others, left disappointed with the large gap between law on the books and law in reality, reject the courtroom for the streets. Using workers' narratives, surveys, and case studies of protests, Gallagher argues that China's half-hearted attempt at rule of law construction undermines the stability of authoritarian rule. New workplace rights fuel workers' rising expectations, but a dysfunctional legal system drives many workers to more extreme options, including strikes, demonstrations and violence.

Authoritarian Legality in China 下载 mobi epub pdf txt 电子书

著者简介

图书目录

Authoritarian Legality in China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

仔细看了看有点失望。首先，书里的资料是过时的，可以看得出来作者的田野主要是在2008年之前做的，关于工人怎么运用法律的资料主要来源于2008年前的访谈和调查，到现在十几年间的变化无法体现。其次，感觉在对工人抗争的事件描述上存在cherry picking的嫌疑。对照clb的事件叙述都能找到出入。最后，作者把不同地域混在一起讲。对于工人的法律运用主要来自2008年之前的上海，对于工人集体抗争的资料来自2008年之后的广东，然后把两个地区的故事混在一起讲了一个中国的故事。这样混淆时间地域的做法让人怀疑最后的结论。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

研究还是不错的研究，结论也很诚恳。但近几年没有进行实地取证考察，访谈内容主要来源于2008年以前，的确是一个硬伤。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

研究还是不错的研究，结论也很诚恳。但近几年没有进行实地取证考察，访谈内容主要来源于2008年以前，的确是一个硬伤。

评分☆☆☆☆☆