Left-leaning academics, liberal pop stars such as Bruce Springsteen, and Democrat politicians from Bernie Sanders to Bill and Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama all have one thing in common: they are avid admirers of Nordic-style social democracy. The reason is simple. At first glance, Nordic countries seem to have everything liberals want to see in America: equal income distribution, good health, low levels of poverty, and thriving economies, all co-existing with big welfare states. By copying Nordic policies, many in the American left hope to transform America to a similar socialist "utopia."
In Debunking Utopia, Swedish author Nima Sanandaji explains why this is all wishful thinking. Certainly, some aspects of Nordic welfare states, such as childcare provision, merit the admiration of liberals. But overall, it is a unique culture based on hard work, healthy diets, social cohesion and high levels of trust that have made Nordic countries successful. Sanandaji explains how the Nordic people adopted this culture of success in order to survive in the unforgiving Scandinavian climate. He systematically proves that the high levels of income equality, high lifespans and other signs of social success in the Nordics all predate the expansion of the welfare state. If anything, the Nordic countries reached their peak during the mid-twentieth century, when they had low taxes and small welfare states. Perhaps most astonishing are his findings that Nordic-Americans consistently outperform their cousins who live across the ocean. People of Nordic descent who live under the American capitalist system not only enjoy higher levels of income, but also a lower level of poverty than the citizens of the Nordic countries themselves.
Sanandaji's previous writings on the roots of Nordic success have gained media attention around the world and been translated into many languages. Debunking Utopia, which expands on this work, should be read by all—liberals and conservatives alike—who follow the debate over the future of American welfare. As Sanandaji shows, there is much Americans can learn from both the successes and failures of Nordic-style social democracy.
Dr. Nima Sanandaji is an author and researcher of Kurdish-Iranian origin who migrated to Sweden as a child. He grew up with welfare support and personally experienced how the welfare state with one hand gave the less well-off opportunities to climb the social ladder, while with the other hand unintentionally trapped them in welfare dependency. He has previously written twenty books, some of which have received international acclaim. Sanandaji is the president of the think tank European Centre for Entrepreneurship and Policy Reform.
评分
评分
评分
评分
从结构上看,这本书的布局堪称精妙。它并没有采用传统的“提出问题—分析问题—解决问题”的线性模式,反而更像是一系列相互关联但又独立完整的思想火花构成的星座图。每一次翻页,都像是在进入一个新的维度进行观察。作者在处理不同主题之间的过渡时,展现出大师级的掌控力,那些看似跳跃的章节,细品之下却有着内在的惊人一致性。举例来说,他对信息茧房的描述,与他对集体决策失灵的分析,在内核上是同一种权力逻辑的变体。这使得读者在阅读过程中,必须时刻保持高度的专注力,否则很容易错过那些隐藏在细节深处的微妙联系。我个人认为,这本书的价值在于它提供了一种新的认知工具,它教导我们如何去辨识那些披着进步外衣的回归现象。这对于那些习惯于接受既定框架的人来说,无疑是一次颠覆性的阅读体验,它强迫你用更复杂的网格去捕捉世界的真实纹理,而不是满足于简单粗暴的二元对立标签。
评分这本书的文字风格真是出乎意料的流畅和富有画面感,简直像是在看一部充满哲学思辨的黑色电影。作者的笔触时而尖锐如手术刀,直指那些被粉饰太平的社会结构病灶;时而又变得极其细腻,描绘出个体在庞大系统碾压下的那种无力感。我尤其喜欢他对“希望”这个词的解构,他没有直接否定希望本身,而是追问我们所追求的“希望”到底建立在何种脆弱的基础上。整本书读下来,感觉就像是经历了一场漫长而艰苦的心理疏导过程,那些平时被我们小心翼翼地压抑在潜意识深处的疑虑,都被一一摆到了桌面上,接受审视。相比于那些充斥着术语和枯燥论证的社科著作,这本书更像是一种艺术创作,它用引人入胜的故事和层层递进的论证,将严肃的批判融入到一种近乎诗意的体验中。我推荐给所有那些厌倦了被告知“一切都会好起来”的疲惫灵魂,这本书会让你清醒地认识到,真正的改变,往往始于对美好谎言的彻底幻灭。
评分这本书的震撼力在于它对“完美”一词的彻底祛魅。它没有停留在对现有体制的抱怨上,而是深入到人类心智对于秩序和确定性的原始渴望层面进行挖掘。我一直觉得,人类之所以不断创造出新的“理想国”,正是因为我们无法忍受现实的模糊和无常。作者精准地指出了这种对确定性的病态追求,如何成为通往灾难的隐形推手。他用一系列精巧的比喻,将那些宏大的社会构想比喻成脆弱的沙塔,稍有风吹草动便会崩塌。阅读过程中,我时不时地需要停下来,合上书本,去消化那些观点带来的冲击波。这不仅仅是对某个特定政治经济体系的批评,它更像是一部关于人类宿命论的深刻寓言。它没有给我们提供任何逃避的出口,而是将我们牢牢地钉在原地,让我们直视我们所构建的世界的内在逻辑缺陷。这本书,与其说是在批判一个概念,不如说是在解剖我们自己内心深处对秩序的过度依赖,其穿透力,远超我的想象。
评分坦白讲,这本书的阅读门槛不低,它要求读者付出相当的智力投入,但回报绝对是值得的。作者的学术背景显然非常扎实,他对哲学、历史乃至人类行为学的引用信手拈来,且毫不晦涩。我感觉自己像是跟随一位饱经风霜的智者在进行一场深度对话,他不断地抛出挑战性的观点,迫使你不断地后退、重新评估,再向前推进。特别是在论及社会契约的演变时,那种对历史必然性的反思,让人不寒而栗。这不像是一本“畅销书”,它更像是一本需要反复研读、并在不同人生阶段重新拾起的“案头书”。它不会给你即时的安慰,反而会带来一种深刻的、但却是必需的“不适感”。这种不适感正是成长的催化剂。它没有提供快速的救赎,而是提供了一面清晰的镜子,让你看清在追求完美的过程中,我们究竟牺牲了多少真实的人性与自由。对于那些渴望深度思考而非肤浅娱乐的读者来说,这本书是不可多得的珍品。
评分这本书读起来真是一次思想上的洗礼。作者对于现代社会中那些看似完美、实则暗藏危机的“乌托邦”愿景进行了极其深入且不留情面的剖析。我记得其中有一章详细论述了技术进步如何被包装成解放人类的福音,但实际上却在悄无声息地加剧了社会隔离和个体异化。那种感觉就像是你一直以为你在往高处攀登,结果发现那所谓的山顶不过是一个更精致的牢笼。作者的叙事逻辑严密得令人窒息,他引用的那些历史案例,尤其是对早期社会实验失败的分析,让人不得不重新审视我们现在所信奉的进步观。我特别欣赏他处理复杂概念时的那种克制与精准,既没有陷入纯粹的悲观主义,也没有给出廉价的解决方案,而是逼迫读者直面矛盾的深处。读完后,我感觉对日常生活中那些宏大叙事都多了一层警惕的滤镜,不再轻易被那些光鲜亮丽的口号所迷惑。这种批判性的视角,对于任何一个自诩为思考者的人来说,都是一种必要的“精神排毒”。这本书的重量,不在于它提供了多少答案,而在于它提出了多少值得我们深思且令人不安的问题。
评分类似于诺思,这本书也注重风俗习惯、价值观和社会资本(信任)等非正式制度对北欧国家高税收、高福利体系的影响。
评分标题有点哗众取宠,但内容还是扎实的。
评分太他妈啰嗦了
评分太他妈啰嗦了
评分感谢伊朗人揭穿三德子和AOC心驰神往的北欧社会主义福利制度的真相
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有