Between Levinas and Heidegger pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

• 海德格尔
• 列维纳斯
• Levinas
• Heidegger
• phenomenology
• ontology
• ethics
• being
• relation
• fundamental
• ontology
• ephemeral

在翻阅这本书之前，我脑海中已经预设了几个关于列维纳斯和海德格尔关系的猜想。一方面，海德格尔早期对“此在”的分析，虽然并未直接指向“他人”，但其对“此在”的“被抛”和“对存在的操心”，为理解个体在世界中的处境奠定了基础。而列维纳斯在这一基础上，进一步将焦点转向了“他者”，认为真正重要的不是此在本身，而是此在面对他者时的责任。另一方面，列维纳斯对“他者”的伦理学构建，在某种程度上可以看作是对海德格尔存在论的一种修正或深化，甚至是一种哲学上的“反抗”。我想象作者可能要探讨的是，列维纳斯对海德格尔“世界性”概念的挪用和转化，或者是在“时间性”的维度上，如何理解“前存在”与“超越”之间的关联。又或者，作者会聚焦于他们对于“语言”和“意义”的不同理解，海德格尔对“隐喻”和“揭示”的关注，与列维纳斯对“承诺”和“命令”的强调，在沟通和理解他者上，存在着怎样的差异和张力。读这本书，我希望能够看到作者如何以一种精妙的方式，将这两位思想家的复杂论述勾连起来，揭示他们思想深处更深层的对话，甚至是他们之间无法言说的默契。

这本 Between Levinas and Heidegger 的书名，本身就充满了哲学研究的魅力。它暗示了一种探索，一种在两位思想巨匠之间穿梭、对话的旅程。我对此非常期待，因为列维纳斯和海德格尔，虽然都在深刻地探讨“存在”和“意义”等根本问题，但他们的哲学路径却又如此引人入胜地不同。海德格尔的“此在”分析，对“在世”状态的深入挖掘，对“死亡”作为“此在”最可能的“自身”的揭示，都为我们理解个体在世界中的位置提供了独特的视角。而列维纳斯则将伦理置于哲学的首要位置，强调“他者”的面孔所带来的不可推卸的责任，将“爱”和“承诺”视为超越本体论的根基。这两条思想的河流，似乎并行却又相互对峙，那么，这本书究竟是如何搭建起一座桥梁，或者说，是如何揭示它们之间那层若有若无的联系的呢？是借由某个特定的概念，例如“时间”、“语言”、“身体”，还是从更广阔的哲学史角度，来审视他们思想的渊源和流变？我迫切地想知道，作者是如何化解这种张力，并从中提炼出更具洞察力的观点，为我们理解现代性语境下的主体性、他者性以及伦理价值的困境，提供新的思考维度。

这本书的书名，Between Levinas and Heidegger，光是读出来就带着一股学理的厚重感，让我很好奇它到底会从哪个角度去探索这两位哲学巨匠之间的关系。我一直觉得，哲学思考的魅力很大一部分在于那种思想碰撞的可能性，尤其是像列维纳斯和海德格尔这样，虽然都深刻地探讨了“他者”和“存在”，但他们的出发点和落脚点却又如此不同。列维纳斯对“面孔”的强调，那种面对他者时无法回避的责任，以及由此衍生的伦理优先性，与海德格尔对“此在”的分析，对“操心”和“忧虑”的揭示，对“向死而生”的阐释，可以说是同根生发，又殊途异归。我尤其想知道，作者是如何在这样看似难以调和的张力中找到连接点的，是借由某个具体的概念，比如“时间性”、“世界性”，还是从更宏观的哲学史语境中来梳理他们的思想脉络？或者，更具挑战性的是，作者是否尝试提出一种新的理解框架，能够同时容纳并阐释他们思想的异同，甚至从中开辟出新的哲学路径？这种跨越式的研究，对于我们理解现代哲学中关于主体性、他者性、以及存在意义的核心问题，无疑具有重要的启发意义。读这样一本书，我期待的不仅仅是知识的增进，更是一种思维的激荡，一种对于哲学本体论和伦理学的全新认识的可能。

This book's title, Between Levinas and Heidegger, is incredibly evocative and promises a deep intellectual engagement. Heidegger's existential analytics, particularly his concept of "Dasein" and its fundamental structures like "care" and "temporality," revolutionized our understanding of human existence and its inherent finitude. His critique of Western metaphysics and his attempt to recover a more authentic relationship with Being have had a profound and lasting impact on philosophical thought. On the other hand, Levinas, deeply influenced by Heidegger yet offering a radical ethical revision, shifts the philosophical center of gravity to the encounter with the "Other." His concept of the "face" as a site of absolute ethical command and his emphasis on responsibility as the very essence of subjectivity present a compelling counterpoint. I am particularly intrigued by how this book will bridge the gap between these two distinct philosophical projects. Does it explore how Levinas's ethical framework might reinterpret Heidegger's ontological insights? Or perhaps how Heidegger's understanding of temporality could inform Levinas's notion of ethical commitment? The potential for uncovering new understandings of subjectivity, alterity, and the foundations of ethical thought is immense, and I look forward to a rigorous exploration of these complex ideas.

这本书的名字，Between Levinas and Heidegger， immediately sparks my intellectual curiosity. It promises a deep dive into the complex relationship between two titans of 20th-century philosophy. Heidegger, with his groundbreaking work on Dasein, authenticity, and the critique of metaphysics, offered a radical new way of understanding human existence and its embeddedness in the world. His concept of "care" and "anxiety" revealed the fundamental structure of our being-in-the-world. On the other hand, Levinas, deeply influenced by but also critical of Heidegger, shifted the philosophical focus dramatically towards ethics, emphasizing the encounter with the Other, the ethical imperative of the "face," and the primacy of responsibility. The very juxtaposition of their names suggests an exploration of profound philosophical tension, perhaps even a dialogue across their differing, yet often intersecting, concerns. I am particularly eager to see how the author navigates this terrain. Will it be through a comparative analysis of key concepts like time, language, or the body? Or perhaps by examining how Levinas's ethical turn can be understood as a response to or a radicalization of Heidegger's existentialism? The potential for new insights into subjectivity, alterity, and the very foundations of ethical thought is immense, and I anticipate a challenging yet rewarding intellectual journey.

The promise inherent in the title, Between Levinas and Heidegger, immediately caught my attention. It suggests a journey into the heart of some of the most significant philosophical debates of the 20th century, focusing on two thinkers whose work, while deeply influential, often seems to occupy distinct conceptual landscapes. Heidegger’s groundbreaking work on “Being and Time,” his meticulous analysis of “Dasein,” and his critique of traditional metaphysics opened up entirely new avenues for understanding human existence, our relationship to the world, and the very meaning of truth. His emphasis on “care,” “anxiety,” and the “call of conscience” remains profoundly impactful. In contrast, Levinas, while a direct interlocutor with Heidegger, famously pivoted towards a philosophy where ethics takes precedence over ontology. His focus on the “face of the Other,” the absolute ethical demand it imposes, and the concept of responsibility as the very foundation of subjectivity, offers a powerful alternative and often critical perspective. I am eager to see how this book navigates the complex terrain between these two intellectual giants. Will it explore the ways in which Levinas’s ethical system can be seen as a response to, or a radicalization of, Heidegger’s existential analytics? Or will it perhaps highlight the productive tensions and dialogues that emerge from their contrasting approaches to language, time, and the constitution of the self?

Having some familiarity with both Levinas and Heidegger, I'm drawn to this book by the promise of a nuanced exploration of their intertwined yet distinct philosophical projects. Heidegger's seminal work on "being-in-the-world" and his analysis of "Dasein" laid bare the fundamental structures of human existence, emphasizing our inherent situatedness and our temporal nature. His critique of Western metaphysics and his call for a new understanding of "truth" as "aletheia" continue to resonate deeply. Levinas, while deeply engaged with Heideggerian thought, famously pivoted towards an ethics that he considered prior to ontology. His concept of the "face of the Other" as a site of infinite ethical demand, and his emphasis on responsibility as the very essence of subjectivity, offer a powerful counterpoint to Heidegger's focus on the solitary Dasein. I am intrigued by the potential ways in which this book might bridge these two perspectives. Does it explore how Levinas's ethical framework might reframe Heidegger's ontology? Or perhaps how Heidegger's understanding of temporality could inform Levinas's notion of ethical commitment? The very title suggests a careful mapping of their conceptual landscapes, highlighting both their points of convergence and their irreducible differences. I expect a rigorous examination that respects the complexity of each philosopher's thought.

From the moment I saw the title, Between Levinas and Heidegger, I knew I had to pick it up. The very idea of exploring the philosophical space between these two monumental thinkers is, in itself, a testament to the dynamic nature of philosophical inquiry. Heidegger, with his monumental project of uncovering the meaning of Being through the analysis of Dasein, offered a profound reimagining of our place in the world, emphasizing our thrownness, our temporality, and our inherent situatedness. His critique of Western thought and his attempt to recall us to a more primordial understanding of existence have had an immeasurable impact. Yet, Levinas, deeply shaped by and ultimately diverging from Heidegger, shifts the ground entirely, asserting the primacy of ethics and the irreducible otherness of the Neighbor. His concept of the "face" as a site of ethical command, and the inherent responsibility that arises from this encounter, presents a compelling challenge to purely ontological concerns. I am particularly eager to discover how this book bridges these seemingly vast conceptual territories. Does it explore how Levinas’s ethical framework recontextualizes Heidegger’s existentialism? Or perhaps how Heidegger’s understanding of temporality can illuminate Levinas’s ethical commitments? The possibilities for uncovering new layers of meaning and understanding are truly exciting.

The very title, Between Levinas and Heidegger, immediately conjures a sense of intellectual inquiry into a fascinating philosophical nexus. Heidegger’s exploration of “being” and “Dasein,” his meticulous dissection of our fundamental existence within the world, has undeniably reshaped continental philosophy. His concepts of “care,” “anxiety,” and the “call of conscience” offer profound insights into the human condition. However, it is Levinas’s radical ethical turn, his emphasis on the irreducibility of the Other and the absolute imperative of responsibility that arises from the encounter with the “face,” that presents such a compelling contrast and potential dialogue with Heidegger. The question that immediately arises for me is: how does this book navigate the apparent chasm between Heidegger’s ontology and Levinas’s ethics? Does it seek to reconcile their seemingly disparate approaches, perhaps by reinterpreting key concepts through the lens of the other? Or does it instead illuminate the productive tensions between them, revealing how each philosopher’s work can both challenge and enrich the other? I’m particularly interested in how the book might engage with their differing views on language, time, and the nature of the self in relation to the world and to others. This promises to be a deep and thought-provoking exploration.

在我看来，选择列维纳斯与海德格尔作为研究的连接点，本身就具有极大的哲学意义。海德格尔的现象学存在论，以其对“此在”的精细分析，深刻地改变了西方哲学对主体性、世界性和实在的理解。他关于“操心”、“忧虑”、“向死而生”等概念，揭示了人类存在本身的脆弱性和偶然性，以及个体在面对自身有限性时所必须进行的根本性反思。而列维纳斯，这位对海德格尔思想有着深刻了解甚至批判的哲学家，则将焦点从“此在”转向了“他者”，强调了“面孔”的出现如何构成了一种不可逾越的伦理命令，以及由此产生的责任是如何先于一切存在的。这两位思想家，一位将存在论置于核心，另一位则将伦理学置于首位，他们的对话，充满了理论上的张力与互补。我特别好奇，这本书会如何处理他们思想中的分歧，是试图消弭这些分歧，还是更深刻地挖掘这些分歧所揭示出的不同哲学进路的可能性？例如，他们对于“语言”的理解，海德格尔视之为“存在的房屋”，而列维纳斯则将语言视为“伦理的媒介”，这种差异又将如何影响他们对“沟通”与“理解”的认识？