Jessica Chen Weiss is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Yale University. The dissertation on which this book is based won the 2009 American Political Science Association Helen Dwight Reid Award. She received her Ph.D. from the University of California, San Diego and founded FACES, the Forum for American/Chinese Exchange at Stanford, while an undergraduate at Stanford University.
What role do nationalism and popular protest play in China's foreign relations? Chinese authorities permitted anti-American demonstrations in 1999 but repressed them in 2001 during two crises in U.S.-China relations. Anti-Japanese protests were tolerated in 1985, 2005, and 2012 but banned in 1990 and 1996. Protests over Taiwan, the issue of greatest concern to Chinese nationalists, have never been allowed. To explain this variation, Powerful Patriots identifies the diplomatic as well as domestic factors that drive protest management in authoritarian states. Because nationalist protests are costly to repress and may turn against the government, allowing protests demonstrates resolve and makes compromise more costly in diplomatic relations. Repressing protests, by contrast, sends a credible signal of reassurance, facilitating diplomatic flexibility. Powerful Patriots traces China's management of dozens of nationalist protests and their consequences between 1985 and 2012.
评分
评分
评分
评分
一本读intro和conclusion觉得结论没什么问题,读完中间章节论证反而觉得值得商榷的书。说国家允许民族主义示威以展示决心,而压制示威以展示友好,本来是很intuitive的结论,然而每个事例几乎都是例外。于是作者发明出各种变量来解释为什么这些事例都成了例外,如对方认为示威是国家煽动,或政府通过其他手段在其他方面施压等。然而章节内理论化却又十分微弱,几乎成了时间线整理,遑论整理出规律。四到八章全部关于中日关系,只有第三章很突兀地写了中美关系,结构上莫名其妙,也让人怀疑其external validity。研究领域IR,理论推导注重上层决策,第一手资料却是从基层示威者得来,全书无一处对决策制定者的采访,堪称奇异。最大收获是确认了IR不是研究民族主义动员应该去的领域。
评分案例研究惨不忍睹,对日本的理解太浅,不知道为啥还被吹捧,就这也能拿到康奈尔的教职也是醉了
评分一本读intro和conclusion觉得结论没什么问题,读完中间章节论证反而觉得值得商榷的书。说国家允许民族主义示威以展示决心,而压制示威以展示友好,本来是很intuitive的结论,然而每个事例几乎都是例外。于是作者发明出各种变量来解释为什么这些事例都成了例外,如对方认为示威是国家煽动,或政府通过其他手段在其他方面施压等。然而章节内理论化却又十分微弱,几乎成了时间线整理,遑论整理出规律。四到八章全部关于中日关系,只有第三章很突兀地写了中美关系,结构上莫名其妙,也让人怀疑其external validity。研究领域IR,理论推导注重上层决策,第一手资料却是从基层示威者得来,全书无一处对决策制定者的采访,堪称奇异。最大收获是确认了IR不是研究民族主义动员应该去的领域。
评分这书是她博士论文改编的,她的博士论文写得很一般
评分博士论文出书,蛮糟糕的,非常名不副实的最佳国际关系博士论文。也不知道Cornell怎么就收了她
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有