Civil Society under Authoritarianism pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Jessica C. Teets is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department and Jeanne Epp Barksdale '48 Junior Faculty Fellow at Middlebury College, Vermont. Her research focuses on governance in authoritarian regimes - specifically the role of civil society such as non-profits, NGOs, and associations - with an emphasis on Chinese politics. She is the author, most recently, of 'Let Many Civil Societies Bloom: The Rise of Consultative Authoritarianism in China' (The China Quarterly, 2013) and 'Reforming Service Delivery in China: The Emergence of a Social Innovation Model' (Journal of Chinese Political Science, 2012). Dr Teets was recently selected to participate in the Public Intellectuals Program created by the National Committee on United States-China Relations.
- 政治学
- 公民社会
- 社会学
- 中国政治
- 海外中国研究
- 威权主义
- 中国
- 威权韧性
Despite the dominant narrative of the repression of civil society in China, Civil Society Under Authoritarianism: The China Model argues that interactions between local officials and civil society facilitate a learning process, whereby each actor learns about the intentions and work processes of the other. Over the past two decades, often facilitated by foreign donors and problems within the general social framework, these interactions generated a process in which officials learned the benefits and disadvantages of civil society. Civil society supports local officials' efforts to provide social services and improve public policies, yet it also engages in protest and other activities that challenge social stability and development. This duality motivates local officials in China to construct a "social management" system - known as consultative authoritarianism - to encourage the beneficial aspects and discourage the dangerous ones. Although civil society has not democratized China, such organizations have facilitated greater dialogue between citizens and state as part of politics in an authoritarian system that normally lacks such channels for participation.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
3.5 operational autonomy, a continuum rather than dichotomy. yet, demand-supply logic rather than institutionalization, not stable. definition of civil society. did not consider the structural factor, when political space becomes narrower, hidden transcripts? missing theoretical framework that can travel across time and leadership.
评分结论和Spires说的几乎一样，把重点稍稍放在gov的learning process上。整体的论述在意料之中，没太多亮点。
评分我觉得作者在内容安排上有点混乱，最后一部分显得仓促。当然，作者提出的Consultative Authoritarianism 还是提供了一种全新的视角去看待中国公民社会的发展，思路值得学习。
评分结论和Spires说的几乎一样，把重点稍稍放在gov的learning process上。整体的论述在意料之中，没太多亮点。
评分西溪西文书库；太繁琐了8
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有