International Association for the Study of Popular Music (IASPM) Book Award 1998
A lively contribution to the debates that are central to popular music studies.
Popular Music in Theory is an original introduction to the key theoretical issues which arise in the study of contemporary popular music. It is organized in a way that shows how popular music is created across a series of relationships that link together industry and audiences, producers and consumers. Starting from the dichotomy between production and consumption which characterizes much work on popular culture, Keith Negus explores the equally significant social processes that intervene between and across the production-consumption divide, and examines how popular music is mediated by technological, cultural, historical, geographical, and political factors. This broad framework provides signposts to various tracks taken by sounds and images, and also highlights distinctive theoretical routes into the study of contemporary popular music. Although intended mainly for students in sociology, media and communication studies, and cultural studies, the book will also give others a deeper understanding of popular music.
"An excellent critical introduction to major theoretical issues and debates in the study of contemporary popular music, drawing on illustrative case studies that will be familiar to a wide readership. Clearly written and well argued, the book will be essential reading for students, researchers and teachers." —Sarah Cohen, Institute of Popular Music, University of Liverpool
Table of Contents
• Audiences
• Industry
• Mediations
• Identities
• Histories
• Geographies
• Politics
http://www.goldsmiths.ac.uk/music/staff/negus.php
Keith Negus entered higher education as a mature student, having spent many years playing keyboards and guitar in a variety of bands after leaving school. He gained a degree in Sociology from Middlesex Polytechnic and then completed a PhD study of the acquisition, production and promotion of recording artists at SouthBank Polytechnic. He subsequently taught at the Universities of Leicester and Puerto Rico and was based in the Department of Media and Communications prior to moving the Department of Music at Goldsmiths College. He is a coordinating editor of Popular Music (Cambridge University Press).
Research interests/activities/major awards/prizes/grants
His research engages with all aspects of the production, consumption and mediation of popular music and key debates in cultural theory. He has recently completed research on musicians on television and written a book on the music and musicianship of Bob Dylan. He is currently conducting research on narrative and the popular song.
The Cultural Production of Musical Genres: A Comparative Study.
October 1995 to December 1996, funded by a grant of £66,040 from the Economic and Social Research Council of Great Britain.
Selected publications/performances/recordings:
Books
Bob Dylan, Equinox Publishing. 2008.
Creativity, Communication and Cultural Value. Sage, 2004. Jointly authored with Dr M. Pickering, Loughborough University.
Popular Music Studies, Arnold, 2002. Edited with Dr. David Hesmondhalgh, Open University.
Music Genres and Corporate Cultures. Routledge, 1999 Spanish edition published by Paidós, Barcelona, 2005.
Doing Cultural Studies, The Story of the Sony Walkman. Sage, 1997. Co-authored with Paul du Gay, Stuart Hall, Hugh Mackay, Linda Janes, all Open University
Popular Music in Theory: An Introduction. Polity Press (UK) 1996, and Wesleyan University Press (USA), 1997. Japanese edition published in 2004 by Editions de la roses vents – Suiseisha, Tokyo.
Producing Pop: Culture and Conflict in the Popular Music Industry. Edward Arnold. 1992
Journal articles
‘Living, Breathing Songs: Singing Along With Bob Dylan’, Oral Tradition, Vol 22 No 1 pp71-83.
‘Musicians on Television: Visible, Audible and Ignored’, Journal of the Royal Musical Association. Vol. 131 No 2, 2006, pp310-330.
‘The Work of Cultural Intermediaries and the Enduring Distance Between Production and Consumption’, Cultural Studies, Vol. 16 No 4, 2002, pp501-515.
‘Belonging and Detachment: Musical Experience and the Limits of Identity’, Poetics, Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts, Vol. 30, 2002, pp133-145. Co-authored with Dra. Patria Román-Velázquez, City University.
‘Cultural Production and the Corporation: Musical Genres and the Strategic Management of Creativity in the U.S. Recording Industry’, Media, Culture and Society, Vol. 20 No. 3, 1998, pp359-379.
Chapters in books
‘Rethinking Creative Production Away From the Cultural Industries’ in James Curran and David Morley (eds), Media and Cultural Theory, Routledge, 2006.
‘The Business of Rap: Between the Street and the Executive Suite’ in Murray Forman and Mark Anthony Neal (eds), That’s the Joint! The Hip-Hop Studies Reader, Routledge, 2004, pp525-540.
‘Identities and Industries: The Cultural Formation of Aesthetic Economies’ in P. du Gay & M. Pryke (eds) Cultural Economy, Sage, 2002, pp115-131.
‘Music Divisions: The Recording Industry and the Social Mediation of Popular Music’ in J. Curran (Ed) Media Organisations in Society, Arnold, 2000, pp240-254,
'The Production of Culture' in P. du Gay (ed) Production of Culture/ Cultures of Production. Sage, 1997, pp67-118
‘Sinéad O'Connor - Musical Mother' in S. Whitely (ed), Sexing the Groove: Popular Music, Gender and Sexuality. Routledge 1997, pp178-190.
Current PhD students and their fields of study:
Adrian Sledmere – The concept of talent and the music industry.
Richard Witts – A historical study of BBC Music policy with particular reference to Radio 3.
评分
评分
评分
评分
一本名叫《Popular Music in Theory》的书,光是这个名字就激起了我强烈的好奇心。我一直对流行音乐抱有浓厚的兴趣,但往往只是停留在表层的欣赏,对于它背后是如何运作、如何被理解的,却知之甚少。我常常在听一首广为流传的歌曲时,会思考它为何能如此深入人心,它的旋律、节奏、和声,甚至是歌词,是如何在潜移默化中触动听众的情感。难道真的只是运气使然,或是某种不可捉摸的天赋?我渴望能够从更深层次去剖析流行音乐的内在逻辑,了解那些构成我们日常听觉体验的要素,是如何被理论化的。这本书的出现,似乎正是我一直在寻找的答案的钥匙。我期待它能带领我走进一个全新的视角,去审视那些曾经熟悉的旋律,发现它们隐藏的精妙之处。也许,通过这本书,我能更好地理解当下音乐市场的趋势,甚至是预测未来的流行方向。更重要的是,我希望它能帮助我培养一种更具分析性的听觉习惯,不再仅仅是被动地接受,而是能够主动地去解读和评价。这种从“听”到“懂”的转变,对我来说,意义非凡。
评分坦白说,《Popular Music in Theory》这个名字,给我一种“冷峻”的学术感,但同时又充满诱惑。我平时听音乐,更多的是凭着直觉和感觉,对那些朗朗上口的旋律、动感的节奏,或是能引起共鸣的歌词,就会深深喜爱。但这种“喜欢”,往往是模糊不清的,我很难清晰地阐述它为什么吸引我。我常常会困惑,那些看起来非常简单的流行歌曲,究竟是如何被创作出来的?是否存在一套可以学习和掌握的“公式”?或者说,那些成功的流行音乐背后,是否隐藏着一套不为人知的“理论体系”?我想通过这本书,能够得到一些更具象的解答。我希望它能教会我如何去“听懂”一首歌,不仅仅是听到表面的声音,更能理解它在结构、编排、情感表达上的巧思。我期待这本书能帮助我将自己模糊的感受,转化为清晰的认知,从而更好地欣赏和评价我所喜爱的音乐,甚至能够初步掌握一些音乐创作的技巧。
评分《Popular Music in Theory》这个书名,在我看来,是一扇通往流行音乐“内心世界”的大门。我一直认为,流行音乐之所以能成为“流行”,必然有其深刻的社会和心理根源,而不仅仅是偶然的流行潮。我常常会陷入一种思考:为什么某个年代的歌曲会承载那个时代的集体记忆?为什么某些歌曲能够引发强烈的社会共鸣,甚至改变人们的某些看法?我渴望能够从理论层面去理解这些现象,而不是仅仅停留在表面的歌词和旋律。我希望这本书能够提供一种分析工具,让我能够剥离流行音乐的商业外衣,去探究其背后隐藏的文化基因、社会功能以及个体心理机制。它是否会探讨流行音乐的演变史,揭示不同时期流行音乐的特征与时代背景的联系?它是否会分析流行音乐在塑造身份认同、传播价值观方面所起的作用?这些都是我非常感兴趣的方面。这本书,对我而言,更像是一次对我们所处文化景观的深度解析,而流行音乐,则是这场解析中不可或缺的重要组成部分。
评分《Popular Music in Theory》这个书名,首先给我的印象是一种严谨而深入的学术探索。我一直认为,流行音乐虽然表面上看起来轻松、易懂,但其背后一定有着复杂的结构和创作逻辑。我时常会思考,为什么某些歌曲会如此具有“传染性”,一旦听过就难以忘怀?为什么某些音乐风格能够迅速风靡全球,而另一些则石沉大海?我希望这本书能够为我提供一个系统性的框架,来理解这些现象。我尤其好奇,书中会如何解释流行音乐的“易传播性”和“生命力”。是技术进步带来的录音和传播方式的改变,还是某种社会文化心理的映射?我希望它不仅仅局限于分析歌曲本身的音乐元素,更能触及到音乐产业、听众心理以及社会文化背景等更广泛的层面。这对我而言,是把流行音乐从一种纯粹的感官享受,提升到一种对社会文化现象进行观察和分析的视角。我期待它能让我以一种更“专业”的眼光去审视我每天接触到的音乐,并从中获得更深刻的洞见。
评分我必须承认,对于《Popular Music in Theory》这本书,我怀揣着一种近乎“解密”的心态。我常常在KTV里听到那些经久不衰的金曲,或者在各大音乐排行榜上看到的霸榜歌曲,都会忍不住去想,这些作品究竟有什么样的“魔力”?它们是不是遵循着某种不易察觉的“成功法则”?我甚至会不自觉地将自己喜欢的歌手的歌曲与那些大众情人般的歌曲进行对比,试图找出它们在音乐创作上的差异。而这本书,它的名字《Popular Music in Theory》,恰恰点燃了我内心深处对这些“秘密”的探求欲。我期待它能够像一位经验丰富的向导,带领我穿越流行音乐的迷宫,揭示那些隐藏在表象之下的规律和原理。是某种特定的和弦进行,抑或是某种巧妙的旋律走向,又或者是歌词中反复出现的某种意象?我想知道,是什么让一首歌能够跨越文化、年龄和地域的界限,成为全球性的热门话题。这本书,对我来说,不仅仅是关于音乐理论,更是关于理解人类情感与集体文化共鸣的奥秘。
评分入门必读。全,但是分析和讨论浅了一些。
评分It talks about a lot of things I already knew but it helps greatly to theorise them.
评分入门必读。全,但是分析和讨论浅了一些。
评分It talks about a lot of things I already knew but it helps greatly to theorise them.
评分It talks about a lot of things I already knew but it helps greatly to theorise them.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有