图书标签: 法学  law  Morton.Horwitz   

喜欢 The Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960 的读者还喜欢

现实主义三章，第一章评述卢埃林和卡多佐的两种理解；第二章分析现实主义核心主张（靠近现实，后果主义，司法裁量，范畴思维批判，公私法区分批判，价值与现实主义关系）；第三章分析庞德和兰蒂斯对于行政国的不同态度，以及中立原则的诞生。

现实主义三章，第一章评述卢埃林和卡多佐的两种理解；第二章分析现实主义核心主张（靠近现实，后果主义，司法裁量，范畴思维批判，公私法区分批判，价值与现实主义关系）；第三章分析庞德和兰蒂斯对于行政国的不同态度，以及中立原则的诞生。

现实主义三章，第一章评述卢埃林和卡多佐的两种理解；第二章分析现实主义核心主张（靠近现实，后果主义，司法裁量，范畴思维批判，公私法区分批判，价值与现实主义关系）；第三章分析庞德和兰蒂斯对于行政国的不同态度，以及中立原则的诞生。

现实主义三章，第一章评述卢埃林和卡多佐的两种理解；第二章分析现实主义核心主张（靠近现实，后果主义，司法裁量，范畴思维批判，公私法区分批判，价值与现实主义关系）；第三章分析庞德和兰蒂斯对于行政国的不同态度，以及中立原则的诞生。

现实主义三章，第一章评述卢埃林和卡多佐的两种理解；第二章分析现实主义核心主张（靠近现实，后果主义，司法裁量，范畴思维批判，公私法区分批判，价值与现实主义关系）；第三章分析庞德和兰蒂斯对于行政国的不同态度，以及中立原则的诞生。

“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...

“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...

“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...

“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...

“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...