The Hollow Hope pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁

Gerald N. Rosenberg

University Of Chicago Press

1993-5-15

432

USD 19.00

Paperback

9780226727035

圖書標籤: 美國憲政法律社會學最高法院美國法律法學違憲審查政治學

喜歡 The Hollow Hope 的讀者還喜歡

下載链接在页面底部

點擊這裡下載

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製鏈接

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

发表于2024-12-23

The Hollow Hope epub 下載 mobi 下載 pdf 下載 txt 電子書下載 2024

The Hollow Hope pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

圖書描述

Liberals have acclaimed, and conservatives decried, reliance on courts as tools for changes. But while debate rages over whether the courts should be playing such a legislative role, Gerald N. Rosenberg poses a far more fundamental question—can courts produce political and social reform?

Rosenberg presents, with remarkable skill, an overwhelming case that efforts to use the courts to generate significant reforms in civil rights, abortion, and women's rights were largely failures.

"The real strength of The Hollow Hope . . . is its resuscitation of American Politics—the old-fashioned representative kind—as a valid instrument of social change. Indeed, the flip side of Mr. Rosenberg's argument that courts don't do all that much is the refreshing view that politics in the best sense of the word—as deliberation and choice over economic and social changes, as well as over moral issues—is still the core of what makes America the great nation it is. . . . A book worth reading."—Gary L. McDowell, The Washington Times

The Hollow Hope 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書

著者簡介

圖書目錄

The Hollow Hope pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

用戶評價

評分☆☆☆☆☆

匠氣之作。法院無法引領社會改革，指齣瞭三大約束和發揮作用的四個條件，並用詳盡的經驗研究來驗證。確確實實看做是最小危險部門瞭。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

法院的角色

評分☆☆☆☆☆

匠氣之作。法院無法引領社會改革，指齣瞭三大約束和發揮作用的四個條件，並用詳盡的經驗研究來驗證。確確實實看做是最小危險部門瞭。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

司法政治學的閱讀材料，其實學的更多的是他的研究方法。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

Bold argument，great data, but considerable overstatement regarding the inherent ineffectiveness of legal tactics and the significance of insights regarding judicial effects provided by his top-down framework. Meanwhile, McCann's (1993) rival analytical approaches have been subtly skirted by Rosenberg. Rember: the unique role of the court here.