格裏高利·剋拉剋,加州大學戴維斯分校經濟係主任,著名經濟史研究專傢。
Why are some parts of the world so rich and others so poor? Why did the Industrial Revolution--and the unprecedented economic growth that came with it--occur in eighteenth-century England, and not at some other time, or in some other place? Why didn't industrialization make the whole world rich--and why did it make large parts of the world even poorer? In A Farewell to Alms, Gregory Clark tackles these profound questions and suggests a new and provocative way in which culture--not exploitation, geography, or resources--explains the wealth, and the poverty, of nations.</p>
Countering the prevailing theory that the Industrial Revolution was sparked by the sudden development of stable political, legal, and economic institutions in seventeenth-century Europe, Clark shows that such institutions existed long before industrialization. He argues instead that these institutions gradually led to deep cultural changes by encouraging people to abandon hunter-gatherer instincts-violence, impatience, and economy of effort-and adopt economic habits-hard work, rationality, and education.</p>
The problem, Clark says, is that only societies that have long histories of settlement and security seem to develop the cultural characteristics and effective workforces that enable economic growth. For the many societies that have not enjoyed long periods of stability, industrialization has not been a blessing. Clark also dissects the notion, championed by Jared Diamond in Guns, Germs, and Steel, that natural endowments such as geography account for differences in the wealth of nations.</p>
A brilliant and sobering challenge to the idea that poor societies can be economically developed through outside intervention, A Farewell to Alms may change the way global economic history is understood.</p>
* 尽管从人类起源至今,人类的技术水平有个很大提高,但人类生活水平的真正提高,是最近200年,工业革命以后的事。因为在这之前,人类无法摆脱“马尔萨斯陷阱”的制约,技术进步的结果,产生了更多的人口,结果人均收入水平,并没提高。换句话说,在克拉克看来,即使是1800...
評分看过英文原版了。台湾繁体字版翻译为《告別施捨:世界經濟簡史》(A Farewell to Alms)。网上已经有不少评论了。 这书里都是作者自己的逻辑和论证。 http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4af8e74101008fdl.html http://www.strongwind.com.hk/article.aspx?id=7218
評分翻译有几处错误,如下。 P185: 新的资本存量水平上,每新增1单位的资本就会使产出再增加dy0。 因此,只要利率保持不变,创新就会使得物质资本投资减少。 原文是induce,译者估计误认为reduce,所以完全弄反了。作者的意思是创新会导致物质资本投资。 P223 事实上,如果人口没...
評分瀑布与汲泵 辉格 2014年5月7日 http://headsalon.org/archives/5153.html 人们在评价一个社会时,常把阶层间的流动性作为一个重要指标,认为适当的流动性是一个健康而有活力社会的应有特性,它可以为奋斗、进取和各种创造性活动提供动力,让身处下层者不至于丧失希望而产生反...
評分终于看完了格里高利.克拉克的《a Farewell to Alms:a Brief Economic History of the World》,来这里谈谈自己的看法。 看了一些评论,不少人在推荐这本书,这些人主要是专业的学者;不少人也在鄙视这本书,认为这本书没什么价值,就如我在豆瓣这里看到的。我要说的是,这本书...
這本書比《Why Nations Fail》聽起來有說服力多瞭——我果然是老racist。但是不用說,racism永遠都聽起來都有post hoc癥。比如說想想中國和印度吧。書裏麵20世紀初的中國工人懶惰,生産率低下,和印度一模一樣,可是一轉眼就成為瞭世界工廠。100年的時間,對書中假設的進化而言,實在是太短瞭。
评分Patently ridiculous, but intriguing nonetheless.
评分數據太多軼聞太少,讀起來還是很無趣的,不過有趣的觀點真的挺多。
评分A stirring book with bold pronouncement and weak evidence.
评分iTunes U和Youtube上有Clark 09年以他這本書為課本的World Economic History before the Industrial Revolution的授課視頻全集!是的Clark實在太萌瞭,講課時對經濟史的熱情真是溢於言錶啊~本是看書纍瞭調劑一下,結果欲罷不能地看瞭好多【←咦效率真低...】
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有