史蒂文·兰兹伯格为芝加哥大学经济学博士,现任罗彻斯特大学经济学教授。兰兹伯格在《Slate》网络杂志撰写的“每日经济学”专栏深受欢迎,他也应邀在《财富》、《福布斯》、《纽约时报》、《华盛顿邮报》、《华尔街日报》等刊物发表文章。著有《一个经济学家给女儿的忠告》、《价格理论与应用》,以及畅销书《生命中的经济游戏》。
Steven Landsburg's writings are living proof that economics need not be "the dismal science." Readers of The Armchair Economist and his columns in Slate magazine know that he can make economics not only fun but fascinating, as he searches for the reasons behind the odd facts we face in our daily lives. In More Sex Is Safer Sex, he brings his witty and razor-sharp analysis to the many ways that our individually rational decisions can combine into some truly weird collective results -- and he proposes hilarious and serious ways to fix just about everything.
When you stand up at the ballpark in order to see better, you make a rational decision. When everyone else does it too, the results, of course, are lousy. But this is just the tip of the iceberg of individual sanity and collective madness. Did you know that some people may actually increase the spread of sexually transmitted diseases when they avoid casual sex? Do you know why tall people earn more money than shorter competitors? (Hint: it isn't just unfair, unconscious prejudice.) Do you know why it makes no sense for you to give charitable donations to more than one organization?
Landsburg's solutions to the many ways that modern life is unfair or inefficient are both jaw-dropping and maddeningly defensible. We should encourage people to cut in line at water fountains on hot days. We should let firefighters keep any property they rescue from burning houses. We should encourage more people to act like Scrooge, because misers are just as generous as philanthropists.
Best of all are Landsburg's commonsense solutions to the political problems that plague our democracy. We should charge penalties to jurors if they convict a felon who is later exonerated. We should let everyone vote in two congressional districts: their own, and any other one of their choice. While we're at it, we should redraw the districts according to the alphabetical lists of all voters, rather than by geography. We should pay FDA commissioners with shares of pharmaceutical company stocks, and pay our president with a diversified portfolio of real estate from across the country.
Why do parents of sons stay married more often than parents who have only daughters? Why does early motherhood not only correlate with lower income, but actually cause it? Why do we execute murderers but not the authors of vicious computer viruses? The lesson of this fascinating, fun, and endlessly provocative book is twofold: many apparently very odd behaviors have logical explanations, and many apparently logical behaviors make no sense whatsoever.
后现代还存在幸生活保守的人,这大概是以前历次思想解放后残余下来的顽固分子,这本书大概是为了彻底将他们铲除,理由是:幸开放可以延缓艾滋病的传播! 作者很天真的认为,一个幸保守的人多与其他人交媾几次,那么至少带来2方面的好处:1. 被交媾的人感染艾滋病的机会降低;2...
评分在我看来第一章是最精彩的,以经济学的方法科学论证了禁欲教育所带来的出乎意料的糟糕效果,事情的真相常常事与愿违,后文中还指出了环保教育也可能陷入类似的误区。顺带嘲讽了宗教保守主义,毕竟宗教的本质是不断召唤过去来支持现在的合法性。其他章节也多有精彩的内容,其核...
评分没看完,也不觉得需要看完。光看前三个例子就觉得困惑很多,很难说服人。 第一:性越多越安全。 作者的想法是性疾病之所以传染迅速,是因为一群“淫荡”的,“ 不负责任”的(至少在他看来是这样的,得了艾滋病还去做爱的风流鬼们)人由于在一个小圈子里进行性交,所以在这个圈...
评分饱吹饿唱…… 中国人尤其北京人是爱胡扯的,或者叫做,侃大山。 看完了这本书我发现,这个美国鬼子也爱胡扯,简称鬼扯…… 奇妙的在于,他懂经济学,而且懂得比一般人多 所以,出现了钱来衡量人命,用成本收益来探讨呼吸机保险。 椎名高志画了一个四格,一个富翁对美女说...
评分我并不是说自己是封建礼教的卫道士,而是实在是逻辑有问题 如果一个人原先性保守,洁身自好,突然去外面乱搞了,确实是扩充了这个群体的基数,也使得一部分原先可能和得艾滋病的人乱搞的人和这个人搞了,使得这一部分人不患艾滋,但这首先就有一个逻辑漏洞,就是 那个得艾滋的...
感觉一般!讲道理很勉强!
评分read First Chapter
评分读懂不到百分之五十。
评分读懂不到百分之五十。
评分其实这书不错 但是此类书都透着洋洋自得的气息
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有