From Frontier Policy to Foreign Policy pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

Matthew W. Mosca is Assistant Professor in the Lyon G. Tyler Department of History at the College of William & Mary.

出版者:Stanford University Press

作者:Matthew W. Mosca

出品人:

页数:408

译者:

出版时间:2013-2-20

价格:USD 60.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780804782241

丛书系列:

图书标签:

海外中国研究
新清史
清史
边疆
历史
印度
近代史
Mosca

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

承接住宅自建房室内改造装修设计免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

Between the mid-eighteenth and mid-nineteenth centuries, Qing rulers, officials, and scholars fused diverse, fragmented perceptions of foreign territory into one integrated worldview. In the same period, a single "foreign" policy emerged as an alternative to the many localized "frontier" policies hitherto pursued on the coast, in Xinjiang, and in Tibet. By unraveling Chinese, Manchu, and British sources to reveal the information networks used by the Qing empire to gather intelligence about its emerging rival, British India, this book explores China's altered understanding of its place in a global context. Far from being hobbled by a Sinocentric worldview, Qing China's officials and scholars paid close attention to foreign affairs. To meet the growing British threat, they adapted institutional practices and geopolitical assumptions to coordinate a response across their maritime and inland borderlands. In time, the new and more active response to Western imperialism built on this foundation reshaped not only China's diplomacy but also the internal relationship between Beijing and its frontiers.

具体描述

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

摘要：马世嘉博士在2013年出版的专著《从边政到外交：印度问题与清代地缘政治学的转变》是近年来美国清史研究领域的一本力作。本书从地缘政治学的视角，考察了清代地理叙事中的“印度”和中印边疆如何从“边政问题”升级为“外交问题”。本书对于清帝国内部由远及近的礼序关系...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

可能是近段时间读过最精彩的一本历史研究：解释了从18世纪开始，清朝原先的各自为政的、依赖当地agent、情报知识复杂混乱的“边政”，如何向着基于统一自洽的地理知识、具有信息整合的情报官僚体系的“外交”缓慢发展；同时考虑了边疆的帝国运作和对外界的知识生产两条主线。中国的地理曾处于“前-范式”时代（Kuhn语），绘图术不受重视，强调地名的文本考据方法无法产生确实、统一的体系化的知识（作者称之为“地理不可知论”）。举个例子，在马戛尔尼来华期间，即使福康安在之前和廓尔喀的战争中由西藏-南亚渠道已对于在加尔各答的英势力略有了解，却不知道这一势力（根据廓尔喀渠道被称为“披楞”）和马的“英吉利”同属一方。而对于印度、英帝国的确切了解，要经历18世纪上半期甚至直到魏源才逐渐明晰。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

第一章写的很细致啊，需要手头留一本。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Going in an important direction, but not as good as one thought.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

最感兴趣的：对于传统地理学的梳理