图书标签: 人类学 Geertz Anthropology 社会学/人类学 Clifford 研究方法 格尔兹 culture
发表于2024-12-22
Works and Lives pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
The illusion that ethnography is a matter of sorting strange and irregular facts into familiar and orderly categories-this is magic, that is technology-has long since been exploded. What it is instead, however, is less clear. That it might be a kind of writing, putting things to paper, has now and then occurred to those engaged in producing it, consuming it, or both. But the examination of it as such has been impeded by several considerations, none of them very reasonable. One of these, especially weighty among the producers, has been simply that it is an unanthropological sort of thing to do. What a proper ethnographer ought properly to be doing is going out to places, coming back with information about how people live there, and making that information available to the professional community in practical form, not lounging about in libraries reflecting on literary questions. Excessive concern, which in practice usually means any concern at all, with how ethnographic texts are constructed seems like an unhealthy self-absorption-time wasting at best, hypochondriacal at worst. The advantage of shifting at least part of our attention from the fascinations of field work, which have held us so long in thrall, to those of writing is not only that this difficulty will become more clearly understood, but also that we shall learn to read with a more percipient eye. A hundred and fifteen years (if we date our profession, as conventionally, from Tylor) of asseverational prose and literary innocence is long enough.
克利福德·格尔兹(Clifford Geertz,1926—2006),1926年生于美国加州,在俄亥俄州安蒂奥克学院学习文学和哲学,1950年在该校获哲学学士学位。之后进入哈佛大学,师从C.克拉克洪学习人类学并于1956年获得人类学博士学位。曾先后在芝加哥大学、斯坦福大学、麻省理工学院、普林斯顿高等研究院社会科学部等著名学府讲学或担任教职。
作为象征人类学和解释人类学的代表人物,格尔兹以其在印度尼西亚和摩洛哥的田野工作为基础,对宗教、文化等领域的研究影响巨大,著有:《爪哇宗教》(1960)、《被信奉的伊斯兰教》(1968)、《文化的解释》(1973)、《尼加拉:19世纪巴厘剧场国家》(1980)、《地方性知识》(1983)、《论著与生活》(1988),《追寻事实》(1995)等,并先后获得了美国社会学会索罗金奖、美国人文-自然科学院社会科学奖、日本福冈“亚洲奖大奖”等多项荣誉。
格尔兹无疑是是近几十年来人类学界中最有影响的人物,但是其影响远不止此,在人类学之外,哲学、语言学、组织研究、文学批评等领域都可见格尔兹的影响,其“农业内卷化”、“地方性知识”、“作为意义体系的宗教”、“解释之解释”、“深描”等概念或方法不仅在人类学界广为流传,也被其他学科所引用。
I really want to know why he didnt talk in detail of Margaret Mead ...
评分Anecdote for fun---- Edmund Leach评论这本书的文风: A psychiatrist friend of mine once told me that he had a patient who spent all his waking hours copying lists of names out of a telephone directory. Geertz writes like that. Every point of argument is reinforced as if it needed to be supported by a thesaurus.
评分on the authorship of ethnography
评分看吐槽集,格尔茨的语言呐。。读起来真艰难。。哎~这英语水准肿么办T_T
评分Anecdote for fun---- Edmund Leach评论这本书的文风: A psychiatrist friend of mine once told me that he had a patient who spent all his waking hours copying lists of names out of a telephone directory. Geertz writes like that. Every point of argument is reinforced as if it needed to be supported by a thesaurus.
这本是一本他点评四位人类学家的毒舌小书:列维斯特劳斯、马林诺夫斯基、本尼迪特、埃文斯-普理查德的民族志。重新翻开这本书,翻译很是糟糕。但是开篇他对写作者(Writer)和作者(Arthur)的区分,再次点醒了我。 这不仅仅只是文学研究里的名词解析,而是直接涉及到两种价值...
评分民族志的描写到底呈现的是人类学家自己的生活还是被描述者的生活,我想格尔茨并不想给出什么具体的答案;无论是马琳诺夫斯基式的经验寻觅、列维斯特劳斯式的对秩序的愤怒,还是本尼迪克特式的文化反讽或者埃文斯-普理查德的文化确信,正如格尔茨所说,他们首先都是对实...
评分民族志的描写到底呈现的是人类学家自己的生活还是被描述者的生活,我想格尔茨并不想给出什么具体的答案;无论是马琳诺夫斯基式的经验寻觅、列维斯特劳斯式的对秩序的愤怒,还是本尼迪克特式的文化反讽或者埃文斯-普理查德的文化确信,正如格尔茨所说,他们首先都是对实...
评分我以为要先读此书,要先读一读格尔兹其人其事(好吧我刚入门或者还没入门),我是在一篇《格尔兹访谈录》里简单了解了一下他,最逗的莫过于格尔兹说当年决定学习人类学之前和女友希莉一起去拜访米德时想的那样“随便你去搞什么只要叫它人类学就好了!” 这样的想法我曾经...
Works and Lives pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024