羅伯特·D. 帕特南(Robert D. Putnam),當代西方著名政治學傢,現任哈佛大學國際事務研究中心主任,肯尼迪政府學院公共政策馬爾林講座教授。他的主要研究領域是政治學、國際政治和公共政策,發錶的著作包括《手拉手:西方七國峰會》、《獨自打保齡:美國社會資本的衰減 》、《讓民主運轉起來》等。
Amazon.com Review
Few people outside certain scholarly circles had heard the name Robert D. Putnam before 1995. But then this self-described "obscure academic" hit a nerve with a journal article called "Bowling Alone." Suddenly he found himself invited to Camp David, his picture in People magazine, and his thesis at the center of a raging debate. In a nutshell, he argued that civil society was breaking down as Americans became more disconnected from their families, neighbors, communities, and the republic itself. The organizations that gave life to democracy were fraying. Bowling became his driving metaphor. Years ago, he wrote, thousands of people belonged to bowling leagues. Today, however, they're more likely to bowl alone:
Television, two-career families, suburban sprawl, generational changes in values--these and other changes in American society have meant that fewer and fewer of us find that the League of Women Voters, or the United Way, or the Shriners, or the monthly bridge club, or even a Sunday picnic with friends fits the way we have come to live. Our growing social-capital deficit threatens educational performance, safe neighborhoods, equitable tax collection, democratic responsiveness, everyday honesty, and even our health and happiness.
The conclusions reached in the book Bowling Alone rest on a mountain of data gathered by Putnam and a team of researchers since his original essay appeared. Its breadth of information is astounding--yes, he really has statistics showing people are less likely to take Sunday picnics nowadays. Dozens of charts and graphs track everything from trends in PTA participation to the number of times Americans say they give "the finger" to other drivers each year. If nothing else, Bowling Alone is a fascinating collection of factoids. Yet it does seem to provide an explanation for why "we tell pollsters that we wish we lived in a more civil, more trustworthy, more collectively caring community." What's more, writes Putnam, "Americans are right that the bonds of our communities have withered, and we are right to fear that this transformation has very real costs." Putnam takes a stab at suggesting how things might change, but the book's real strength is in its diagnosis rather than its proposed solutions. Bowling Alone won't make Putnam any less controversial, but it may come to be known as a path-breaking work of scholarship, one whose influence has a long reach into the 21st century. --John J. Miller --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Publishers Weekly
"If you don't go to somebody's funeral, they won't come to yours," Yogi Berra once said, neatly articulating the value of social networks. In this alarming and important study, Putnam, a professor of sociology at Harvard, charts the grievous deterioration over the past two generations of the organized ways in which people relate to one another and partake in civil life in the U.S. For example, in 1960, 62.8% of Americans of voting age participated in the presidential election, whereas by 1996, the percentage had slipped to 48.9%. While most Americans still claim a serious "religious commitment," church attendance is down roughly 25%-50% from the 1950s, and the number of Americans who attended public meetings of any kind dropped 40% between 1973 and 1994. Even the once stable norm of community life has shifted: one in five Americans moves once a year, while two in five expect to move in five years. Putnam claims that this has created a U.S. population that is increasingly isolated and less empathetic toward its fellow citizens, that is often angrier and less willing to unite in communities or as a nation. Marshaling a plentiful array of facts, figures, charts and survey results, Putnam delivers his message with verve and clarity. He concludes his analysis with a concise set of potential solutions, such as educational programs, work-based initiatives and funded community-service programs, offering a ray of hope in what he perceives to be a dire situation. Agent, Rafe Sagalyn. 3-city tour; 20-city radio satellite tour. (June)
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Written on 9/27/2015 for Social Theory course. I recently read Bowling Alone written by a political scientist, Robert Putnam. One of his main arguments is that people become alienated and no longer engage in civic groups, because more and more people are wa...
評分这么有名的书,直到现在因为要引用,才总算借了读了。这本书其实读个一两百字的摘要就可以了,或者用一个副标题也能基本概括出来:美国社会里社会资本衰退的成因及后果。 我还是很喜欢Putnam的风格的,他写的东西结构层次很清楚,基本上就是三段论:成因、后果、解决,然后每一...
評分托克维尔在《论美国的民主》中描绘过美国人是多么热衷结社。“美国人不论年龄多大,不论处于什么地位,不论志趣是什么,无不时时在组织社团。”“人们把自己的力量同自己的同志的力量联合起来共同活动的自由,是仅次于自己活动自由的最自然的自由。” Bowling Alone这本书主要...
評分“现在的人们都只顾自己,除非有什么事发生在自己身上,否则他们才不会抬起头来看看周围”。看到这句话的时候有一种悲凉一下浸入,美国经历了由公众参与社团活动高涨的时期到现在的个体活动盛行,这似乎每一个社会空间都正在或即将步入的境地,而帕特南教授的这本书正是以科...
評分帕特南為社會資本列出的三個主要方面是規範、網絡,与信任。他在世紀轉折點看到的美國是一個社會資本日漸衰落的社會。在讀這本書的時候,我時不時地触碰到一些新鮮的活例,這讓閱讀過程中的思考略顯輕鬆。 一個在美國工作的朋友回國,一兩年前抱定辭職回國發展的念頭繼續動搖...
it's a notice for folks who stuck online and don't even bother bowling but constantly blowing with themselves.
评分民主怎麼瞭?電視看太多
评分Just brilliant.
评分民主怎麼瞭?電視看太多
评分民主怎麼瞭?電視看太多
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有