Bowling Alone

Bowling Alone pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

出版者:Touchstone Books by Simon & Schuster
作者:Robert D. Putnam
出品人:
页数:544
译者:
出版时间:2001-8-7
价格:USD 18.00
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9780743203043
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 社会学
  • Sociology
  • 社会资本
  • 政治学
  • 美国
  • politics
  • 政治
  • 政治理论
  • 社会学
  • 人际关系
  • 美国社会
  • 公民社会
  • 社会资本
  • 社会疏离
  • 社区参与
  • 现代性困境
  • 信任危机
  • 公共生活
想要找书就要到 小哈图书下载中心
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Amazon.com Review

Few people outside certain scholarly circles had heard the name Robert D. Putnam before 1995. But then this self-described "obscure academic" hit a nerve with a journal article called "Bowling Alone." Suddenly he found himself invited to Camp David, his picture in People magazine, and his thesis at the center of a raging debate. In a nutshell, he argued that civil society was breaking down as Americans became more disconnected from their families, neighbors, communities, and the republic itself. The organizations that gave life to democracy were fraying. Bowling became his driving metaphor. Years ago, he wrote, thousands of people belonged to bowling leagues. Today, however, they're more likely to bowl alone:

Television, two-career families, suburban sprawl, generational changes in values--these and other changes in American society have meant that fewer and fewer of us find that the League of Women Voters, or the United Way, or the Shriners, or the monthly bridge club, or even a Sunday picnic with friends fits the way we have come to live. Our growing social-capital deficit threatens educational performance, safe neighborhoods, equitable tax collection, democratic responsiveness, everyday honesty, and even our health and happiness.

The conclusions reached in the book Bowling Alone rest on a mountain of data gathered by Putnam and a team of researchers since his original essay appeared. Its breadth of information is astounding--yes, he really has statistics showing people are less likely to take Sunday picnics nowadays. Dozens of charts and graphs track everything from trends in PTA participation to the number of times Americans say they give "the finger" to other drivers each year. If nothing else, Bowling Alone is a fascinating collection of factoids. Yet it does seem to provide an explanation for why "we tell pollsters that we wish we lived in a more civil, more trustworthy, more collectively caring community." What's more, writes Putnam, "Americans are right that the bonds of our communities have withered, and we are right to fear that this transformation has very real costs." Putnam takes a stab at suggesting how things might change, but the book's real strength is in its diagnosis rather than its proposed solutions. Bowling Alone won't make Putnam any less controversial, but it may come to be known as a path-breaking work of scholarship, one whose influence has a long reach into the 21st century. --John J. Miller --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From Publishers Weekly

"If you don't go to somebody's funeral, they won't come to yours," Yogi Berra once said, neatly articulating the value of social networks. In this alarming and important study, Putnam, a professor of sociology at Harvard, charts the grievous deterioration over the past two generations of the organized ways in which people relate to one another and partake in civil life in the U.S. For example, in 1960, 62.8% of Americans of voting age participated in the presidential election, whereas by 1996, the percentage had slipped to 48.9%. While most Americans still claim a serious "religious commitment," church attendance is down roughly 25%-50% from the 1950s, and the number of Americans who attended public meetings of any kind dropped 40% between 1973 and 1994. Even the once stable norm of community life has shifted: one in five Americans moves once a year, while two in five expect to move in five years. Putnam claims that this has created a U.S. population that is increasingly isolated and less empathetic toward its fellow citizens, that is often angrier and less willing to unite in communities or as a nation. Marshaling a plentiful array of facts, figures, charts and survey results, Putnam delivers his message with verve and clarity. He concludes his analysis with a concise set of potential solutions, such as educational programs, work-based initiatives and funded community-service programs, offering a ray of hope in what he perceives to be a dire situation. Agent, Rafe Sagalyn. 3-city tour; 20-city radio satellite tour. (June)

Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

作者简介

罗伯特·D. 帕特南(Robert D. Putnam),当代西方著名政治学家,现任哈佛大学国际事务研究中心主任,肯尼迪政府学院公共政策马尔林讲座教授。他的主要研究领域是政治学、国际政治和公共政策,发表的著作包括《手拉手:西方七国峰会》、《独自打保龄:美国社会资本的衰减 》、《让民主运转起来》等。

目录信息

读后感

评分

社会资本,如同物质资本和人力资本一样,是构成人类社会财富的重要组成部分。社会资本人与人之间互惠互利、关系紧密的交往规范、人际网络和信任机制。 对于社会资本的衡量和考察切入点,主要从政治参与(政党)、公民参与(公民组织)、宗教参与(教会)、工作中联系(协会)、...

评分

The definition of social capital There is not a unified definition of social capital. The term was first used by Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk in 1895. Böhm-Bawerk is a member of Austrian School of economics. He used the term as the opposite of “private capi...  

评分

读《独自打保龄》有感 ——从“普遍互惠”角度浅谈中国社会资本问题 全书主要探讨社会资本对政治的影响、社会资本对政治的影响作用有多大、社会资本对政治的影响方式是怎样和面对社会资本对政治的影响我们该怎么做等问题,深入浅出、由表及里、细致入微并且通俗易懂,读完之后...  

评分

托克维尔在《论美国的民主》中描绘过美国人是多么热衷结社。“美国人不论年龄多大,不论处于什么地位,不论志趣是什么,无不时时在组织社团。”“人们把自己的力量同自己的同志的力量联合起来共同活动的自由,是仅次于自己活动自由的最自然的自由。” Bowling Alone这本书主要...  

评分

Written on 9/27/2015 for Social Theory course. I recently read Bowling Alone written by a political scientist, Robert Putnam. One of his main arguments is that people become alienated and no longer engage in civic groups, because more and more people are wa...  

用户评价

评分

Possible rationales of the reduction in social capital upon which Americans used to found, educate, and enrich the fabric of their social lives. The reasons, according to Putnam, are derived from the movement of women into the labor force, increasing mobility, demographic transformations, and the technological transformation of leisure.

评分

Social capital.

评分

was expecting a more rigorous analysis, but only found it disappointing and disturbing. The analysis is very crude and some conclusions Putnam drew are even wrong by simply looking into the figures. Moreover, many indicators that should have been separated are put together, which lead to somewhat superficial argument...

评分

也许没有那么lonely

评分

这是神棍的理论。。。

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有