There is probably no area in contemporary Western philosophy more exciting and engaging than philosophy of religion. The plethora of books and articles on topics falling within its domain evidences unmistakably the avid interest of philosophers, both those disposed to religious belief as well as those inclined to reject it. This is partly due to the interconnectedness of the topics generally associated with philosophy of religion. Some find a never-ending fascination with trying to weave various initially discordant strands into a coherent meaningful whole, while others, contrariwise, see nothing but loose ends and disconnectedness. For example, some, notably atheists, view the existence of evil as incompatible with one or more of God's attributes. Others argue that the amount of evil in the world makes God's existence strongly improbable. Theists have tried to address the former problem with various consistency strategies and the latter with evidential arguments designed to hold the line for the probability of God's existence. There is also a cluster of troublesome and difficult questions relating to Christian theistic beliefs about God's sovereignty and how it relates to human freedom and responsibility. The questions are indeed multivarious and often perplexing if not daunting; the stakes are as high as any life presents.
But perhaps the chief reason for philosophy of religion's attraction is the fact that considerations having to do with the existence and nature of a Supreme Being raises issues of ultimate concern. No issue surpasses it in terms of importance, ramification and implication. All else one endeavors to affirm in philosophy pivots, and rightly so, on claims made regarding whether such a being exists, and what sort of beliefs properly follow from affirmation or denial of God's existence.
Two basic orientations prevail in the literature in the West, the analytic way of thinking, or as some prefer to call it, Anglo-American philosophy, and Continental philosophy. The latter finds some representation in this collection, but some readers no doubt may think it not enough. The analytic is given greater attention for a number of reasons, only a few of which are only briefly stated here. Scant if any attention is given to arguments for the existence of God by Continental authors. Other topics typically included in Western philosophy of religion texts are also sparsely covered if at all, such as miracles, and other evidential sorts of topics, like the problem of evil.
As for further representative balance, not only are the non-theists given a significant voice, authors from the three mainstream Christian traditions, Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Orthodox can be found in their respective distinctiveness. A choice is apparent with regard to numbers of authors. Wholeness of an essay has been an important criterion rather than numbers of authors. We've attempted to put together the best of the most recent materials available, some of which appears in book form for the first time.
The topics selected are something of an index to the bulk of the literature: faith and reason, arguments for the existence of God, the problem of evil, the attributes of God, miracles, religion and science, religion and ethics, death, identity, immortality and resurrection, and religious pluralism. Unlike my earlier anthology, Philosophy of Religion, An Anthology of Contemporary Views (also in a Chinese Edition), this new collection includes historical as well as contemporary authors. Philosophy can't be properly grasped apart from its historical context. One regret is that page constraints didn't allow a fuller historical panorama. The topics are briefly described below.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书给我的整体感觉是,它更像是一份内部研究资料的公开版本,而不是一本面向公众的、经过精心打磨的知识产品。作者(或编者)显然对这些文本有着极其深入的个人理解,但这种理解并未有效地转化为可供他人消化的知识形态。书中的引言部分,原本应该是建立起读者信心的桥梁,但这里的语言风格却充满了学术圈内特有的傲慢与疏离感。它不屑于使用比喻,不屑于进行类比,仿佛读者应该天生就具备理解这些高深概念的心智结构。阅读过程中,我多次产生一种错觉:我不是在阅读一本旨在普及知识的书,而是在偷窥一份高级研讨会的内部会议记录。对于那些希望通过阅读本书来建立对宗教哲学基本范畴的认识,并希望从中找到启发,以指导自己人生思考的普通读者来说,这本书无疑是冷漠且难以亲近的。它的价值在于其所包含的原始材料的纯粹性,但这种“纯粹性”的代价,却是极高的阅读门槛和极大的认知负荷。我希望未来的再版能够更关注“沟通的艺术”,而不是仅仅停留在“材料的堆砌”上。
评分我必须承认,这本书在装帧设计上倒是颇具匠心,封面采用了一种粗粝的纹理纸,墨色的主调配合烫金的书名,确实散发出一种庄重而古老的仪式感,让人一拿到手就觉得内容非同小可。然而,这种外表的精致感,与内页的排版形成了鲜明的对比。字体选择偏向于细瘦的衬线体,行距处理得异常紧凑,仿佛印刷厂为了节省纸张而将字行挤压在一起。长时间阅读下来,我的眼睛承受了巨大的压力,总有一种文字在纸面上“拥挤”在一起的感觉,难以快速捕捉句子间的逻辑重心。更让人不解的是,一些关键的术语,本应加粗或使用斜体加以区分,但在这里它们只是平淡地出现在正文中,与普通叙述无异。我甚至怀疑,编辑在校对时是否真正理解了这些文本的复杂性。每当遇到一个需要深入思考的段落时,我不得不用铅笔画线、标注,但很快就发现,由于纸张的质地问题,墨水有些洇开,使得我的笔记也变得模糊不清。总而言之,这本书的物理形态似乎在无形中为阅读设置了障碍,它在视觉上营造了一种“严肃”的氛围,但这种严肃感,却建立在牺牲读者舒适度的基础之上。对于一本旨在“选读”的入门级或进阶级读物来说,这种排版策略是极其不负责任的。
评分这本书的章节划分和内容组织,简直像是一位天马行空的作曲家创作的交响乐,充满了突兀的转调和意料之外的停顿。你以为它会沿着某一特定的哲学流派——比如现象学或者分析哲学——进行一次连贯的探讨,结果它可能在阐述完笛卡尔的二元论后,毫无过渡地跳跃到伊斯兰哲学中关于“自由意志”的辩论,而这两部分之间的联系,仅靠一个简短的页脚注释勉强维系。这种跳跃性,让读者难以建立起一个宏观的知识框架。我更倾向于看到一种清晰的结构,例如“古代根源——中世纪的整合——现代的挑战——当代的对话”这样的时间线索,或者至少是按地域和核心议题进行清晰的分类。但这本书似乎更热衷于展示“知识的广度”而非“理解的深度”。它像一个堆满了珍贵古董的阁楼,所有东西都被随意地堆放在一起,虽然每一件都是稀世之宝,但没有导览图,普通访客只会感到迷失和不知所措。我经常发现自己阅读完一个章节后,必须花上十分钟的时间,在脑海中重新构建一个逻辑地图,试图弄明白这个片段到底在整个哲学图景中占据了什么位置。这种需要读者自己进行大量结构化工作的阅读体验,无疑极大地削弱了“选读”本应提供的便利性。
评分关于注释和导读部分,这本书的处理简直是一场灾难。一本好的经典选读,其价值往往体现在那些能将晦涩文本与当代理解连接起来的精妙注释上。然而,这本书的注释系统似乎是为那些已经精通拉丁文和古希腊文的学者准备的。注释往往只是一些参考文献的罗列,或者对某个古希腊词汇进行极其简短的、几乎是字典式的翻译,而完全没有触及该词汇在特定哲学语境下的深层含义。举个例子,当涉及到一个复杂的形而上学术语时,注释里仅仅给出了它的拉丁文对应词,却对这个词在托马斯·阿奎那的体系中与其他概念是如何相互制约、相互定义的关键信息避而不谈。这就像给一个初学游泳的人递给他一本关于流体动力学的教材,却不告诉他如何换气一样。结果就是,读者被留在了文本的表面,无法深入其核心。一个真正有价值的导读应该能引导读者预设问题、理解文本的历史背景和论证的潜在缺陷,但这本选读的导读部分,更多的是一种对原作者生平的流水账式介绍,对于理解其哲学贡献帮助甚微。我感觉自己像是被推到了一个知识的悬崖边上,只看到了深渊,却缺少可以攀援的绳索。
评分这本书的书名是《宗教哲学经典选读》,但是,我手上的这本,恕我直言,读起来更像是一本晦涩难懂的学术论文集,而不是一本“选读”。如果你的目的只是想快速了解不同宗教哲学流派的核心思想,这本书恐怕会让你大失所望。它似乎更青睐于那些早已在学术圈内享有盛誉,但对于普通读者来说几乎是陌生的思想家的早期、甚至有些零散的文本。我花了大量时间试图梳理康德的某个脚注与某个中世纪经院哲学家论证之间的微妙联系,结果发现,这种联系更像是作者为了证明自己研究的深度而生硬地连接起来的,逻辑链条极其脆弱。书中对某些概念的界定,比如“存在论的必然性”和“超验的彼岸性”,几乎没有提供任何通俗易懂的阐释,直接就进入了对原著的碎片化引用,这就使得阅读过程充满了挫败感。我不得不频繁地去查阅其他辅助读物,才能勉强理解它试图探讨的某个哲学命题的背景。坦率地说,如果不是我对这个领域有近乎偏执的兴趣,我早就合上它,转而寻求那些更侧重于思想史脉络梳理的书籍了。这本书的选材和编排方式,更像是给研究生导师展示研究成果的工具,而非面向大众的知识普及读物。它牺牲了可读性,去追求一种近似于“原汁原味”的引用,结果却让读者在原汁原味中迷失了方向。
评分在历史学院的报告厅。赠书。
评分算是少少地读了几篇吧 书的策划不错 价格也很平民 我觉得宗教哲学就该拿这个当教材 PS: Swinburne的篇幅挺多的(唉!)
评分在历史学院的报告厅。赠书。
评分算是少少地读了几篇吧 书的策划不错 价格也很平民 我觉得宗教哲学就该拿这个当教材 PS: Swinburne的篇幅挺多的(唉!)
评分算是少少地读了几篇吧 书的策划不错 价格也很平民 我觉得宗教哲学就该拿这个当教材 PS: Swinburne的篇幅挺多的(唉!)
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有