Naming and Necessity pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Saul Aaron Kripke is an American philosopher and logician now emeritus from Princeton and professor of philosophy at CUNY Graduate Center. He has been immensely influential in a number of fields related to logic and philosophy of language. Much of his work remains unpublished or exists only as tape-recordings and privately circulated manuscripts. He is nonetheless widely regarded as the foremost philosopher of the turn of the millenium, and was the winner of the 2001 Schock Prize in Logic and Philosophy.

出版者:Harvard University Press

作者:Saul A. Kripke

出品人:

頁數:192

译者:

出版時間:1980-7-26

價格:USD 25.00

裝幀:Paperback

isbn號碼:9780674598461

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

哲學
語言哲學
分析哲學
Kripke
剋裏普剋
形而上學
Philosophy
語言

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics or in philosophy of language, this is it.

Ever since the publication of its original version, Naming and Necessity has had great and increasing influence. It redirected philosophical attention to neglected questions of natural and metaphysical necessity and to the connections between these and theories of reference, in particular of naming, and of identity. From a critique of the dominant tendency to assimilate names to descriptions and more generally to treat their reference as a function of their Fregean sense, surprisingly deep and widespread consequences may be drawn. The largely discredited distinction between accidental and essential properties, both of individual things (including people) and of kinds of things, is revived. So is a consequent view of science as what seeks out the essences of natural kinds. Traditional objections to such views are dealt with by sharpening distinctions between epistemic and metaphysical necessity; in particular by the startling admission of necessary a posteriori truths. From these, in particular from identity statements using rigid designators whether of things or of kinds, further remarkable consequences are drawn for the natures of things, of people, and of kinds; strong objections follow, for example to identity versions of materialism as a theory of the mind.

This seminal work, to which today's thriving essentialist metaphysics largely owes its impetus, is here published with a substantial new Preface by the author.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

毕业那段时间把200来页的naming and necessity读完。在这本书中，作者Kripke先是澄清了一些有关指称的问题，接着举了一些例子来说明先验的不一定是必然的，而必然的不一定是先验的。而在最后一节，Kripke才将他在这些逻辑学上的观点应用到心灵哲学这个领域中来。一开始我还真...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

在大学里，颇有一部分力薄儒的主业是掩饰自己的愚蠢。我相信这本书就是那群人捧起来的。跟克里普克是智力低下的表现。克里普克只是在分析哲学内部，披着分析哲学的外衣，重复近代欧陆哲学的谬误而已。 “所有可能的世界” 这是一个令我当场火冒三丈，至今含恨2年的词组。...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

本书在不少前辈里得到较高的评价，可晚辈看了半个多月，实在头痛。打听一下，原来都看的是英文版...... 怒了，译本读起来太吃力了，难读到好几次我以为我是在看蓝猫！而事实上这翻译的却像蓝波！宁愿看英文了，虽然水平很菜，那也认了，起码不能让中文白痴忽悠了自己

評分☆☆☆☆☆

绪言第5页后来我终于认识到—正是这种认识导致了我在前面提到的 1963 至 1964 年间的工作—对认为通名之间有必然同一性的这种广为接受的观点是不正确的加以反对…… 应为“后来我终于认识到……那种广为接受的、反对通名之间的必然同一性的预设是不正确的”。正文第95页如果...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

很难想象，这个年代的 actualist，能把概念和数学逻辑的关系问题搞成这个模样。四种数学逻辑理论，指着一个模态理论做。就如同一辆四驱车，只剩下一个轱辘。这，还不原地画圈儿？？（← 看在傅里叶级数的份儿上，我厚道点儿）哲学立场，评论标题我已经点明了。详细说说本书...

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Peter指定的語言哲學文獻w花瞭八節課。最喜歡Lecture2的circularity argument，上課的時候被Kripke的腦迴路妙到起雞皮疙瘩w。Lecture3的theoretical identifications也是我最喜歡的部分，感覺跟上學期的形而上學課對接起來，有種視野很開闊的感覺w。目前進入到Kaplan的閱讀，在看Kaplan對Kripke的批評都覺得不那麼有力。所以還是非常喜歡這本演講錄的。（這個演講竟然是Kripke30歲的作品，而20歲的我，還在哲院當廢柴，哭瞭）

评分☆☆☆☆☆

怪不得有實驗哲學文獻說好多受調查者不認同他老訴諸的“我們”的直覺呢，有些是挺擰巴的。他老還強行規定（stipulate）專名和一些種類的名稱在可能世界中指稱不變，說因為這使用的是“我們的語言”而不考慮可能世界居民怎麼指稱。他老用來固定指稱對象的“內部結構”其實很不清楚啊。他老想象我們可能由於視覺幻覺一直搞錯瞭金子的顔色，所以可以有意義地談論金子也許不是黃色的，進而不能認為“金子是黃色金屬”是必然的。那麼他老怎麼阻止彆人進一步假想：化學傢可能一直搞錯瞭金元素的原子序數，從而也可以有意義地談論金子的原子序數可能不是79呢？或者換個不那麼離奇的例子，如果穿越到三百年前，根據當時的權威學說，是不是得說光在所有可能世界都必然不是波而僅是粒子？後來發現光具有波的性質，以前“必然”的就要變瞭麼？

评分☆☆☆☆☆

有點四兩撥韆斤的味道……

评分☆☆☆☆☆

http://socialistica.lenin.ru/analytic/txt/k/kripke_1.htm

评分☆☆☆☆☆