In most liberal democracies commercialized media is taken for granted, but in many authoritarian regimes the introduction of market forces in the media represents a radical break from the past with uncertain political and social implications. In Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China, Daniela Stockmann argues that the consequences of media marketization depend on the institutional design of the state. In one-party regimes such as China, market-based media promote regime stability rather than destabilizing authoritarianism or bringing about democracy. By analyzing the Chinese media, Stockmann ties trends of market liberalism in China to other authoritarian regimes in the Middle East, North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa and the post-Soviet region. Drawing on in-depth interviews with Chinese journalists and propaganda officials as well as more than 2000 newspaper articles, experiments and public opinion data sets, this book links censorship among journalists with patterns of media consumption and media's effects on public opinion.
评分
评分
评分
评分
内容详实的博士论文,唯一的遗憾是略过了对网络的讨论,而作者在结论中试图对网络事件的描述实际上有可能减弱作者认为传统媒体稳固威权统治的重要性。
评分没有看完,也不想再看了。从隐蔽的威权到直白的独裁,时代已经变了,媒体的形态、角色和影响也都变了。俱往矣。
评分没有看完,也不想再看了。从隐蔽的威权到直白的独裁,时代已经变了,媒体的形态、角色和影响也都变了。俱往矣。
评分终于出了。她的博士论文研究应该是近几年领域内做得最好的
评分一党制为核心的政治环境如何使得纸媒marketization解决了独裁者悖论。分化了的媒体类型,给予一定开放空间又不失控制,提高了媒体的信任度,分流了读者的选择,方便了舆情的引导。资料很充实,提出问题的方式也很正统。但总感觉太中规中矩了。。。最后加上的点比较分析有点弱。。。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有