From a “Human Rights Hero,” a memoir of her illustrious career litigating groundbreaking cases
Today Judge Nancy Gertner dons a long black robe while presiding over court cases for the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. But in the 1970s, when she was one of few women in a stubbornly male profession, she sported bright red suits that reflected her fearless choice of cases and her daring litigation tactics. Defending clients in some of the most prominent criminal and civil rights cases of the time, Gertner drove home the point that women lawyers belonged in our courtrooms.
In 1975, Nancy Gertner launched her legal career by defending antiwar activist Susan Saxe, who was on trial for her role in a robbery that resulted in the murder of a police officer. It was a high-profile, complex, and highly charged case. What followed for Gertner was a career of other groundbreaking firsts, as she fought her way through the boys’ club climate of the time, throwing herself into criminal and civil cases focused on women’s rights and civil liberties.
Looking back on her storied career, Gertner writes about her struggle to succeed personally and professionally while working on benchmark cases. Among her clients were a woman suing the psychiatrist who had repeatedly molested her; another on trial for murdering her abusive husband; Teresa Contardo, suing Merrill Lynch for discrimination; and Clare Dalton, suing Harvard Law School for the same offense. In her signature red suit, Nancy Gertner was always the unrepentant advocate in defense of women. But over the years she also represented a student accused of rape; Ted Anzalone, on trial for extortion; and Matthew Stuart, implicated in his brother Charles’s infamous murder of his pregnant wife.
In Defense of Women is the one-of-a-kind memoir of an exceptional, self-proclaimed “outsider lawyer.”
评分
评分
评分
评分
说实话,这本书的阅读门槛稍微有点高,它对读者的背景知识和耐心度提出了不小的要求。里面的某些象征手法和典故引用,如果不查阅资料,可能很难完全领会其深层含义。但如果能坚持读下去,你会发现它所构建的世界观是极其宏大和自洽的。作者构建了一个复杂的人物谱系,每个人物都背负着厚重的历史包袱和未竟的愿望,他们的对话充满了机锋和潜台词,每一次交流都像是高手之间的博弈。我印象最深的是关于“记忆”与“遗忘”的主题,它探讨了历史是如何被塑造、被选择性地记载,以及个体在集体记忆的洪流中如何挣扎求存。这本书的结构非常精巧,采用了多重叙事角度,让你在不同的视角间跳跃,从而对事件产生一种多维度的理解,避免了任何单一视角的偏颇。它更像是一件精密的仪器,你需要理解了每一个齿轮的运作方式,才能明白它最终指向的方向。
评分这本小说简直是场思想的盛宴,作者的笔触细腻得令人心惊,每一个人物的内心挣扎都被刻画得入木三分。故事线索纷繁复杂,却又在不经意间交织成一张严密的网,让人在阅读过程中不断地进行推测和反思。尤其是对于社会阶层固化和个体命运抗争的描绘,那种无力和挣扎的氛围,扑面而来,让人喘不过气。它不是那种快节奏的爽文,更像是一部慢炖的浓汤,需要你静下心来细细品味其中蕴含的哲学意味。我尤其欣赏作者在描述环境细节时的功力,那些老旧的街道、潮湿的空气、斑驳的墙壁,仿佛都拥有了自己的呼吸和记忆,成为了推动情节发展的重要力量。读完后,我花了很长时间才从那种略带压抑但又充满力量感的氛围中抽离出来。这本书的后劲儿非常大,它会让你审视自己身边的一切,思考那些被我们习以为常的规则背后,究竟隐藏着多少不公与无奈。那种对人性的深刻洞察,远超出了普通文学作品的范畴,更像是一部社会学的田野调查报告,只是用极富美感的文学语言包装了起来。
评分对于那些追求纯粹娱乐性的读者来说,这本书可能不太适合,因为它要求你付出大量的精神劳动。但如果你是一个热衷于探讨社会结构、人性幽微之处的思考者,那么这本书无疑是一份珍宝。我特别欣赏作者在处理女性角色时所展现出的复杂性与多面性,她们绝非扁平化的符号,而是有着自己独立而强大的内心宇宙。书中对于权力结构下个体如何维护自身尊严的探讨,尤其具有现实意义。它没有提供简单的答案,而是将矛盾赤裸裸地摆在台面上,迫使读者去直面那些不适感。这本书的语言风格变化多端,时而冷峻如冰,时而又带着一股温暖的烟火气,这种对比使得故事的层次更加丰富。总而言之,这是一部需要反复阅读才能完全消化的作品,它带来的不仅仅是故事的满足感,更是一种智识上的愉悦和对世界更深一层的理解。
评分初读这本书,我被它那种近乎于散文诗般的叙事风格深深吸引住了。语言的运用简直是炉火纯青,充满了画面感和音乐性,即使是描述最平淡无奇的日常场景,也能从中读出一种古典的韵味和现代的疏离感。情节的推进并不着急,更像是生活本身的样子——充满了偶然性和无目的性,但每一个微小的偶然背后,似乎又都潜藏着某种宿命的指引。作者似乎对“时间”这个概念有着独特的理解,时间在书中时而拉长成永恒的寂寞,时而又加速成转瞬即逝的幻觉。我特别喜欢其中几处关于自然景物的描写,那些关于光影、水流和季节更替的文字,读起来简直是一种享受,仿佛能闻到泥土的芬芳,感受到风拂过皮肤的凉意。这本书似乎并不急于给出一个明确的答案或结论,它更像是一个开放的提问,邀请读者带着自己的人生经验去填补那些留白之处。它需要的不是一个快速的读者,而是一个沉浸其中的朝圣者,去感受文字背后的情绪暗涌。
评分这本书最让我感到震撼的是它对“沉默”的描绘。很多关键的情感和重大的转折,都没有通过激烈的对白来展现,而是隐藏在人物的动作、眼神、甚至是长时间的停顿之中。作者擅长用大段的心理描写来构建一种内在的张力,那种说不出口的痛苦、压抑在胸腔里的爱意或仇恨,比任何呐喊都更有力量。我感觉自己像是潜入了一口深井,周围是厚重的黑暗,偶尔有一束微弱的光线穿透进来,照亮了井底那些被遗忘的碎片。这种对“未尽之言”的捕捉,显示出作者极高的敏感度。而且,这本书在处理复杂情感关系时,非常克制和审慎,它不贩卖廉价的煽情,而是将人物置于极端的道德困境中,让他们自己去寻找出路。这使得故事的结局虽然留有余韵,但绝不是那种皆大欢喜的俗套,而是带着一种经历沧桑后的释然。
评分Why will people have strong beliefs? Shouldn't such things we call"belief" change all the time through time?
评分Why will people have strong beliefs? Shouldn't such things we call"belief" change all the time through time?
评分Why will people have strong beliefs? Shouldn't such things we call"belief" change all the time through time?
评分Why will people have strong beliefs? Shouldn't such things we call"belief" change all the time through time?
评分Why will people have strong beliefs? Shouldn't such things we call"belief" change all the time through time?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有