具体描述
'A surprising and provocative intervention in thinking about deconstruction and environmental crisis, an exciting shift in direction.' - Timothy Clark, Durham University, UK
'This gem of a book should be read by anyone who wants to avoid repeating the past. Like a faintly heard, uncanny background noise that starts to ooze menacingly around the facile conversations in the foreground, de Man emerges as a figure with a crucial message regarding the current world historical, ecological emergency. De Man rises again, not the person as such, but the persona: a deconstructor distinct from Derrida, attuned to the radical contingency and secrecy of language, the impossibility of easy ways out. De Man is put into conversation with Deleuze and Guattari, Agamben, even de Landa and Lovelock. De Man returns from the dead, not as a rejuvenated person but as a haunting warning against compulsive affirmations of 'life.' Oh, and there's a very beautiful set of his notes on Benjamin, in facsimile and transcription.' - Timothy Morton, University of California, Davis, USA
Paul de Man is often associated with an era of ‘high theory’, an era it is argued may now be coming to a close. This book, written by three leading contemporary scholars, includes both a transcript and facsimile print of a previously unpublished text by de Man of his handwritten notes for a lecture on Walter Benjamin. Challenging and relevant, this volume presents de Man’s work as a critical resource for dealing with the most important questions of the twenty-first century and argues for the place of theory within it.
The humanities are flooded with crises of globalism, capitalism and terrorism, contemporary narratives of financial collapse, viral annihilation, species extinction, environmental disaster and terrorist destruction. Cohen, Colebrook and Miller draw out the implications of these crises and their narratives and, reflecting on this work by de Man, explore the limits of political thinking, of historical retrieval and the ethics of archives and cultural memory.
作者简介
Tom Cohen is Professor of Literary, Cultural and Media Studies, University at Albany, SUNY, USA.
Claire Colebrook was Professor of Modern Literary Theory at the University of Edinburgh from 2000-2008 and is now a professor of English at Penn State University, USA.
J. Hillis Miller is Distinguished Research Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Irvine, USA. He olds honorary degrees as Doctor of Letters from the University of Florida, Doctor of Humane Letters at Bucknell University, and Doctor Honoris Cause at the University of Zaragoza. He is also Honorary Professor of Peking University and past president of the Modern Language Association.
目录信息
Introduction, Claire Colebrook
Transcript Notes on the Task of the Translator, Paul de Man
Part 2: Theory and the Disappearing Future
1. Paul de Man at Work: In These Bad Days, What Good is an Archive?, J. Hillis Miller
2. Toxic Assets: De Man’s Remains and the Ecocatastrophic Imaginary (an American Fable), Tom Cohen
3. The Calculus of Individual Worth, Claire Colebrook
· · · · · · (收起)
读后感
用户评价
这本书的阅读体验,更像是置身于一座由复杂理论构筑的巨大图书馆中,空气中弥漫着陈旧纸张和未解谜题的气息。我发现自己不得不频繁地停下来,对照着书后的注释和索引,以确保没有遗漏任何一个关键的脚注或引文背后的深意。作者的句法结构复杂而精妙,往往一个长句就能承载起三四层递进的含义,这无疑为翻译工作设置了极高的门槛,也为普通读者制造了不小的阅读障碍。然而,一旦你适应了这种特定的“语流”,便会体会到一种智力上的愉悦,仿佛在解开一个极其精巧的机械装置。我尤其喜欢他处理“可能性与必然性”关系的段落,他巧妙地引入了量子物理学的某些概念,将其作为一种隐喻,来探讨人类集体意志在塑造未来时的局限性。这本书显然不是为寻求快速阅读和即时知识的用户设计的,它要求你慢下来,甚至退回去,去重新审视那些你以为早已掌握的概念。
读罢此书,心中涌起的是一种近乎眩晕的解放感,仿佛所有的既有认知结构都被轻轻摇晃,然后以一种全新的、略带错位的角度重新组合起来。作者的笔触异常大胆,他毫不留情地挑战了现代社会对于“进步”和“目标性”的盲目崇拜。我印象最深的是其中关于“技术乌托邦的幻灭”那一章,那种对过度乐观主义的解剖,精准得如同外科手术刀,没有丝毫多余的情感渲染,仅仅是冰冷地展示了逻辑的必然走向。这种冷静的批判性姿态,与当下主流媒体中充斥的浮夸未来愿景形成了强烈的张力。你不会从这本书里找到任何简单的答案或安慰,它提供的更像是一种深刻的怀疑,一种对我们正在奔赴的“终点”的质疑。这本书的结构是跳跃的,从对古典形而上学的探讨,瞬间切入对当代数字生存状态的观察,这种跨越时空的对话,反而增强了其论点的穿透力,让人不得不思考,那些看似新的困境,是否只是旧有问题的变体。
这本书的魅力在于其彻底的疏离感。它像是一面冷峻的镜子,映照出的不是我们渴望看到的、充满希望的明天,而是我们不断逃避、却又不断创造的“正在消散”的现实。作者对“未来”的消解,并非是一种虚无主义的宣告,而更像是一种对现有叙事模式的深度清理工作。他不动声色地抽走了支撑我们向前狂奔的那些形而上学的支柱。我发现这本书的文本具有一种令人不安的内在音乐性,即便是最枯燥的理论论述,也带有一种沉郁的、近乎哀歌的韵律。这种情绪上的共鸣,使得那些冰冷的哲学概念获得了令人难忘的重量。它迫使我们直面一个悖论:当我们越是试图精确地定义或规划未来时,那个“未来”本身似乎就越发捉摸不定、越发远去。这本书带来的不是知识的增量,而是一种对“已知”的结构性动摇。
我必须承认,这本书对我来说,是一次充满挫折感的朝圣之旅。它的“理论性”并非挂在口头上的标签,而是渗透在每一个词语选择和论证逻辑之中的骨架。我花费了大量时间去理解作者如何将“现象学”的视角嫁接到对“后人类”社会的批判上,那种跨学科的融合既令人惊叹,又叫人望而生畏。书中的论证链条极其绵长,一旦中间某个环节的理解出现偏差,整个后续的推导就会变得晦涩难懂。它更像是一部给专业研究者准备的深度研讨稿,而不是面向大众的普及读物。不过,正是这种深度和毫不妥协的学术姿态,使其在同类主题的著作中显得尤为突出。它没有迎合读者的期待,反而强迫读者去适应它所建立起来的独特认知框架。读完后,我感到自己的思维工具箱里多出了一些全新的、形状奇特的工具,尽管目前还不太清楚如何将它们应用到日常的分析中去。
这本书的叙事节奏如同慢火熬制的汤,初读时也许会觉得略显沉闷,那种对宏大概念的反复叩问,需要读者投入极大的耐心去消化。作者似乎并不急于抛出惊人的论断,而是选择了一条更为迂回的路径,带领我们穿梭于各种看似不相关的哲学思辨与历史碎片之间。我特别欣赏他对“时间性”的解构,他没有采用传统的线性叙事来探讨未来,而是将其拆解成无数个可能性的碎片,每一个碎片都带着自身的重量和张力。这种处理方式,使得文本的密度极高,每一次重读都能发现新的纹理。比如,他对某个十七世纪哲学家关于“虚无”的论述的引用,看似是题外话,实则为后续探讨“消失”的未来奠定了晦涩而坚实的基调。整本书的语言风格是极其克制的,充满了学术的严谨,但也正因如此,它要求读者放下对即时满足的期待,准备好与作者一同进行一场漫长而深邃的心智漫步。这本书更像是一份邀请函,邀请你进入一个充满回声和迷宫的思维空间,而非提供一份清晰的地图。