Professor Nussbaum is the Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics, appointed in the Philosophy Department, Law School, and Divinity School. She is an Associate in the Classics Department and the Political Science Department, a Member of the Committee on Southern Asian Studies, and a Board Member of the Human Rights Program. She is the founder and Coordinator of the Center for Comparative Constitutionalism.
Martha Nussbaum received her BA from NYU and her MA and PhD from Harvard. She has taught at Harvard, Brown, and Oxford Universities. From 1986 to 1993, Ms. Nussbaum was a research advisor at the World Institute for Development Economics Research, Helsinki, a part of the United Nations University. She has chaired the Committee on International Cooperation and the Committee on the Status of Women of the American Philosophical Association, and currently chairs its new Committee for Public Philosophy. She has been a member of the Association's National Board. In 1999-2000 she was one of the three Presidents of the Association, delivering the Presidential Address in the Central Division. Ms. Nussbaum has been a member of the Council of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and a member of the Board of the American Council of Learned Societies. She received the Brandeis Creative Arts Award in Non-Fiction for 1990, and the PEN Spielvogel-Diamondstein Award for the best collection of essays in 1991; Cultivating Humanity won the Ness Book Award of the Association of American Colleges and Universities in 1998, and the Grawemeyer Award in Education in 2002. Sex and Social Justice won the book award of the North American Society for Social Philosophy in 2000. Hiding From Humanity won the Association of American University Publishers Professional and Scholarly Book Award for Law in 2004. She has received honorary degrees from thirty-seven colleges and universities in the U. S., Canada, Asia, and Europe, including Grinnell College, Williams College, The College of William and Mary, The University of St. Andrews (Scotland), the University of Edinburgh (Scotland), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium), the University of Toronto, the Ecole Normale Supérieure (Paris), the New School University, the University of Haifa, Ohio State University, and Georgetown University. She received the Grawemeyer Award in Education in 2002, the Barnard College Medal of Distinction in 2003, the Radcliffe Alumnae Recognition Award in 2007, and the Centennial Medal of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences at Harvard University in 2010. She is an Academician in the Academy of Finland. In 2009 she won the A.SK award from the German Social Science Research Council for (WZB) for her contributions to "social system reform," and the American Philosophical Society's Henry M. Phillips Prize in Jurisprudence.
In this short and powerful book, celebrated philosopher Martha Nussbaum makes a passionate case for the importance of the liberal arts at all levels of education.
Historically, the humanities have been central to education because they have rightly been seen as essential for creating competent democratic citizens. But recently, Nussbaum argues, thinking about the aims of education has gone disturbingly awry both in the United States and abroad. Anxiously focused on national economic growth, we increasingly treat education as though its primary goal were to teach students to be economically productive rather than to think critically and become knowledgeable and empathetic citizens. This shortsighted focus on profitable skills has eroded our ability to criticize authority, reduced our sympathy with the marginalized and different, and damaged our competence to deal with complex global problems. And the loss of these basic capacities jeopardizes the health of democracies and the hope of a decent world.
In response to this dire situation, Nussbaum argues that we must resist efforts to reduce education to a tool of the gross national product. Rather, we must work to reconnect education to the humanities in order to give students the capacity to be true democratic citizens of their countries and the world.
Drawing on the stories of troubling--and hopeful--educational developments from around the world, Nussbaum offers a manifesto that should be a rallying cry for anyone who cares about the deepest purposes of education.
可以作为略读的书籍,旨在为人们传达一种观点:在崇尚科技的时代里,人文学科的开展和对人文素养的关注仍不会过时,甚至对于学生而言是非常有必要,比如创造性思维、批判思维、避免宗教种族性别歧视、国际视野等。里面提到的一些关于苏格拉底式教学、杜威、福禄贝尔、泰戈尔等...
评分为什么我们会觉得沟通乏力? 为什么很多人会觉得空虚寂寞无聊? 为什么很多人会失去信仰? 为什么很多人没有自己的想法,人云亦云? 根据作者的解释,因为我们孩童时,天然地都会有自恋情结。但在成长过程中,会慢慢地磨平这份情结。在游戏中我们的想象...
评分此書據Nussbaum(2010)譯出。 此書強調人文教育對培養批判性思維的重要性,但自身卻以一種不利於訓練批判性思維的方式來寫作。此書自己承認「本書是個宣言,而不是考察式的研究」(p. 136),而沒有意識到宣言式的寫作方式對訓練批判性思維是有害的。例如,書中引用了一個教師有...
评分为什么我们会觉得沟通乏力? 为什么很多人会觉得空虚寂寞无聊? 为什么很多人会失去信仰? 为什么很多人没有自己的想法,人云亦云? 根据作者的解释,因为我们孩童时,天然地都会有自恋情结。但在成长过程中,会慢慢地磨平这份情结。在游戏中我们的想象...
评分为什么我们会觉得沟通乏力? 为什么很多人会觉得空虚寂寞无聊? 为什么很多人会失去信仰? 为什么很多人没有自己的想法,人云亦云? 根据作者的解释,因为我们孩童时,天然地都会有自恋情结。但在成长过程中,会慢慢地磨平这份情结。在游戏中我们的想象...
翻开这本书时,我原本期待着一本偏向学术研究或政策分析的读物,但《Not For Profit》却展现出一种令人耳目一新的文学性。它的语言风格变化多端,时而如同涓涓细流般细腻入微,描绘着某个具体行动的心理过程;时而又陡然转为磅礴大气,探讨着跨越地域和时间的伦理困境。这种叙事上的弹性,极大地丰富了阅读的层次感。最让我印象深刻的是,它似乎有一种魔力,能够将抽象的组织结构和复杂的财务运作,转化为一个个鲜活的、充满张力的人际关系场域。我仿佛能“看到”那些决策桌上微妙的权力博弈,闻到空气中弥漫的理想主义与现实压力碰撞出的火花。这本书的结构设计也颇为精妙,它没有采用传统的线性推进,而是通过不断的回溯和跳跃,构建了一个多维度的理解空间。我需要反复咀嚼其中的某些段落,因为作者似乎总是在字里行间埋藏着一些需要深度思考才能揭示的暗示。它不是一本可以轻松读完的书,它要求读者投入心力,去参与到这场智力与情感的探险中。对于任何一个关注社会组织运作和价值实现的人来说,这本书提供了一个不可多得的、能够激发深度反思的媒介。它成功地将枯燥的机制探讨,升华为一场关于人类动机的深刻对话。
评分这本《Not For Profit》给我带来了极其深刻的阅读体验,虽然我无法具体描述书中的内容细节,但它在整体上构建了一个引人深思的框架,让我对“非营利”这一概念有了全新的认识。作者似乎非常擅长于捕捉那些隐藏在宏大叙事之下的微观动力学。我尤其欣赏它那种不动声色的批判性,它不是那种直白地指责或歌颂的文字,而更像是一面多棱镜,将复杂的社会机制和人性在资源分配中的挣扎,以一种近乎冷峻的笔触展现出来。阅读过程中,我多次停下来,试图梳理作者铺陈的那些逻辑链条,它们环环相扣,构建了一个严密而又令人不安的图景。这本书的叙事节奏掌控得相当到位,时而急促,仿佛置身于一个紧迫的决策现场;时而又放缓,沉浸在对某一理论根基的深入挖掘中。它成功地避开了许多同类主题作品中常见的说教腔调,转而采用了一种更接近于观察者视角的记录方式,使得读者可以自由地在其中投射自己的理解和情感。我能感受到作者在资料收集和案例选择上付出的巨大心力,那些被提及的场景和人物,即便只是寥寥数笔,也显得如此真实可信,充满了生活的质感。这本书无疑会成为我书架上需要时常翻阅的一本参考,因为它提供了一种看待世界运行方式的独特视角,一种对既有秩序的微妙挑战。
评分这本书给我的感觉,与其说是在阅读文字,不如说是在解构一个复杂的生态系统。它展现了一种罕见的宏观视野,将微小的个人行动置于巨大的社会、经济和历史背景之下进行审视。作者的叙事手法非常高明,他仿佛拥有上帝视角,能够同时看到系统顶层的设计意图和底层执行者的日常挣扎。我欣赏其中对于“效率”与“人情”之间张力的探讨,这似乎是这类组织面临的永恒悖论。书中对不同文化背景下,非营利行为模式差异的比较分析,尤为精彩,展现了作者扎实的跨学科功底。文字的节奏感把握得极其精准,在关键的转折点,叙事会突然变得简练有力,给读者留下充分的喘息和消化时间,而在需要铺陈细节时,又能做到丝丝入扣,不放过任何可能影响整体判断的细微之处。这本书的整体氛围是沉静而有力的,它不煽情,但其所揭示的现实图景足以让人心潮起伏。它成功地将一个看似边缘的领域,提升到了探讨人类社会组织结构和集体行动本质的高度,极具启发性。
评分阅读《Not For Profit》的过程,更像是一场对既有假设的持续拆解。这本书的语言风格极其克制,但内里的力量却惊人地强大。它没有陷入对“道德高地”的盲目歌颂,反而深入挖掘了在资源稀缺状态下,维持组织运转所需的各种隐形“契约”和妥协。我特别赞赏作者在处理那些灰色地带时的游刃有余,他似乎不急于给出评判,而是让那些复杂的互动关系自然地在读者面前展开。这种留白的处理,使得这本书具有极高的开放性,不同背景的读者都能从中读出与自身经验相呼应的片段。它在结构上似乎也充满了实验性,不断地打破传统的章节界限,以一种有机生长的方式将不同的案例和理论观点串联起来。这本书对“目标一致性”的探讨尤其发人深省,它揭示了即使怀抱着最高尚的目标,在实际操作层面,也依然要面对结构性制约和内生性冲突的挑战。总而言之,这是一部需要耐心细品的著作,它提供的远非简单的信息,而是一种看待世界运作逻辑的全新工具箱。
评分读完《Not For Profit》,我感到一种强烈的认知重构。这本书的独特之处在于,它似乎完全抛弃了对“成功”与“失败”的二元判断,而是专注于揭示“运作本身”的复杂性。作者似乎对人性中那种根深蒂固的驱动力有着近乎病态的洞察力,并将其巧妙地映射到了非营利领域的实践中。我能体会到一种强烈的现场感,仿佛自己置身于那些充满理想却又资源极度匮乏的环境中,亲身经历了每一个进退两难的抉择。文字的密度非常高,很少有冗余的表达,每一个句子都像被精心雕琢过,承载着多重含义。尤其在讨论资源获取和使命坚持的平衡时,作者的笔触展现出一种近乎残忍的客观,不偏袒任何一方,只是冷静地陈述事实的逻辑走向。这种冷静,反而比任何激烈的控诉都更具穿透力。这本书不是在提供标准答案,而是在提出更尖锐的问题,引导读者去质疑那些我们习以为常的“善意”背后的结构性限制。它迫使我重新审视自己对“奉献”和“价值”的定义,这种自我审视的过程,是阅读体验中最宝贵的部分。
评分Ideal education in an ideal world
评分作者横向比较了印度(工科为重)和美国(通识教育)的高等教育,穿插自己在成为美国公民的过程中对美democracy的见解(顺便黑一手中印)。对于作者来说,liberal arts提供了democracy最需要的所有素质:自我培养和对他人的责任心。其中包括对于社会问题/政治的敏感度,同情心,批判思维等等。以卢梭的艾米丽为模型,从精神分析的角度阐述文科对塑人的重要性。喂,扯什么蛋呢。当然本书提供了一个文科生YY美好前景的蓝图,可惜更多是一种宣言, 标题已经自证了——不图利。
评分這書一開始看得讓人有點血脈噴張不過後來想想有點美國人自吹自擂的嫌疑喲
评分学完微分几何之后热情高涨,就写了篇广义相对论的专著。。。。
评分really disappointing for someone of her stature. Highly polemical and (therefore) highly simple-minded - and it reads like policy-oriented propaganda.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有