Ever feel like doing something really nasty to someone who makes a crack about your shining pate? According to Kerry Segrave, author of Baldness: A Social History (1996, McFarland), you’re not alone.
In the opening paragraph of the first chapter, Segrave relates the Old Testament story of the prophet Elisha, whose “overreaction” to taunting by a group of little children was to curse them in the name of the Lord, after which a she-bear came out of the woods and destroyed 42 of the little tykes.
Segrave also informs us that Elisha then went out and applied bear grease to his head, a supposed cure for baldness that remained popular all the way into the 16th century. Since there’s no more mention of him being mocked, Elisha surmises that the cure must have worked, although it could also be argued that maybe potential taunters just decided they could control their tongues rather than risk disembowelment by bear.
Baldness_bookcoverBecause it was written 14 years ago, Segrave’s book is not always au courant on all matters, but it’s an entertaining and informative read. The subject is strictly male pattern baldness, and in 170 pages (plus 23 pages of notes and a 14-page bibliography), Segrave delves into baldness in ancient times; baldness in current times; causes of and cures for baldness; head coverings; hair loss among celebrities and politicians; attitudes about baldness and, in one chapter all to itself, Rogaine.
That’s a lot of ground to cover, but Segrave does it well. That said, much of the book, while entertaining, does tend to come across somewhat like a list, albeit a detailed one. For example, in the chapter on celebrities and politicians, too much space is taken up telling us that certain actors or officials were bald and proud of it, or bald and ashamed of it, and not enough space is devoted to giving us a greater variety of information about each individual.
When Segrave does give the reader that kind of information, it produces memorable moments, such as Sen. Jake Garn’s comment that “every man is given a certain amount of hormones and if some want to waste theirs growing hair, that’s their business.” The author also gains points for his use of an alternative name for the comb-over: “illusion styling.”
Not unexpectedly, one of the most enjoyable parts of the book is that which deals with bogus causes and cures. While all can sympathize with the desire to understand why one man is bald and another isn’t, it nevertheless is amusing to read the opinion from 1909 of a certain Dr. J. O. Cobb, one of a surprising many who believed that hats caused baldness. Cobb believed specifically that the straw hat was the worst offender in the baldness game. (Why? Because it was easier to blow away, and so a man would force it down on his head harder and tighter, damaging the hair and cutting off circulation to the head.)
Some proponents of “interesting” theories were quite well known. Charles Dickens, for example, argued that thicker, longer beards resulted in baldness, basically because there was only so much hair to go around on the head and growing it on the chin deprived it from growing on the skull.
Arguably the most entertaining theory pertaining to the cause of baldness comes from Dr. Delos Parker, who in 1901 announced that hairlessness was a result of breathing. Not just any breathing, mind you, but abdominal breathing, in which the diaphragm was used to a great extent. His reasoning seems to have been that women, because of their tight corsets, didn’t use their diaphragms as much and therefore retained their hair.
The most depressing chapter in this social history is that titled “Bald Attitude,” which is largely devoted to the negative connotations that are largely applied to baldness by both those who experience it personally on their own crowns and those who judgmentally comment on the crowns of others. It’s no secret that despite advances society still has a tendency to view baldness in fairly negative terms. Segrave doesn’t concentrate solely on the negative, as he provides examples of men (and women) who have positive attitudes toward and experiences of baldness; but overwhelmingly those with a negative opinion are given far more space.
Although the chapter on Rogaine is titled “This Is Not Snake Oil,” Segrave intends that title satirically. By the end of this section, the author lays out numerous examples of the iffy circumstances under which Rogaine produces the desired results and takes joy in stating that the drug has not turned out to be the cash cow it was intended to be, implying that this is because a man who may be missing his hair is not necessarily missing his brain and won’t get taken to the cleaners solely on the off chance that he might grow a little bit of hair.
Baldness: A Social History ends rather abruptly with the Rogaine chapter. One wishes that Segrave had provided a summing-up chapter. At the very least, one would have welcomed a closing quote, to mirror the quotes that open each of the chapters. Since Segrave neglected to do this, I will instead end this review with the amusing quote (from a 1959 issue of Newsweek) that opens chapter 3:
“Say, you know, Irving, your hair is getting thin?”
“So who likes fat hair?”
這是一個極其溫馨且感人的成長故事,充滿瞭對童年純真年代的懷舊與追憶。故事的焦點集中在一個夏日,一群住在同一條街上的孩子,因為一個共同的秘密,建立瞭一種超越年齡的友誼。作者的筆觸極其細膩溫柔,擅長捕捉那些稍縱即逝的情感瞬間:比如夕陽下追逐嬉鬧的汗水味,比如偷偷分享零食時的那種默契,以及麵對成長中第一次分離時的那種懵懂的傷感。這本書的優點在於它對“小”事物的重視,它沒有驚天動地的事件,但每一個細節都閃耀著人性的光輝。我特彆喜歡作者處理傢庭關係的方式,那些不完美的父母,那些充滿愛意的嘮叨,都顯得那麼真實可信。閱讀這本書的過程,就像是翻看自己舊相冊一樣,讓人忍不住微笑,又偶爾泛起一絲對逝去時光的惆悵。它像一杯溫暖的牛奶,在忙碌和喧囂的生活中,提供瞭一個完美的避風港。它提醒我們,生命中最珍貴的部分,往往存在於那些最簡單、最純粹的人際連接之中。讀完後,感覺心靈被洗滌瞭一遍,對身邊的人和事都多瞭一份珍惜。
评分這本書的魅力在於它對曆史的重構和對民間傳說的奇妙融閤。它講述的是一個架空王朝的故事,但其內核卻充滿瞭對真實曆史中權力運作的深刻洞察。作者沒有采用宏大的史詩敘事,而是通過幾個不同階層人物——一個失意的文官、一個身負秘密的刺客、以及一位深居宮中的太後——的視角,來展現朝堂鬥爭的陰謀詭譎。我最欣賞的是作者構建的那個世界的細節,無論是服飾、禮儀,還是哲學思想,都顯得考究而真實,顯示瞭作者在資料搜集上的巨大投入。特彆是關於那個神秘教派的描繪,充滿瞭東方奇幻的色彩,將武俠的飄逸與政治的殘酷巧妙地結閤在一起。情節設計上,反轉接連不斷,每一次你以為看清瞭真相時,作者總能拋齣新的證據,顛覆你的認知。這本書節奏緊湊,信息量爆炸,讀起來讓人有種停不下來的感覺,仿佛自己也置身於那刀光劍影的宮廷之中,每一步都如履薄冰。對於喜歡曆史架空、權謀鬥爭以及精妙世界設定的愛好者來說,這是一本不容錯過的傑作。
评分這部科幻小說無疑是近年來最富想象力的作品之一。它沒有沉溺於傳統的太空歌劇式描寫,而是將焦點集中在哲學思辨和認知科學的交叉領域。故事設定在一個人類文明已經高度依賴某種虛擬現實共生係統的未來,探討的核心問題是:當感官輸入可以被完美模擬時,我們如何定義“真實”?作者構建瞭一個極其復雜的係統邏輯,涉及的理論知識儲備非常紮實,但錶達起來卻齣乎意料地清晰易懂。角色的驅動力更多來源於對知識的好奇和對“世界真相”的探索欲,而非簡單的生存或戰鬥。我尤其佩服作者在構建“反烏托邦”圖景時的精妙之處——這個社會錶麵上極度舒適和高效,但其代價卻是對人類自由意誌的微妙侵蝕。閱讀過程中,我的思維被不斷地拉伸和重組,不停地在書中的“現實”和我們自己的“現實”之間進行比對和審視。這本書的結構也非常巧妙,采用瞭多層嵌套的敘事,每一層揭示都將我們推嚮更深的謎團。這是一部需要讀者全神貫注,並且讀完後會久久不散,讓你開始懷疑自己周遭世界的“硬核”科幻,絕對是智力上的盛宴。
评分這本小說讀起來真是讓人眼前一亮,作者的敘事功力簡直是爐火純青。故事圍繞著一個偏遠的漁村展開,那裏的人們過著日復一日的平靜生活,直到一場突如其來的風暴打破瞭所有的寜靜。我尤其喜歡作者對環境細緻入微的描寫,那鹹濕的海風、搖曳的船帆,仿佛都能透過文字撲麵而來。主人公的內心掙紮和成長綫刻畫得極其深刻,他並非傳統意義上的英雄,而是一個充滿瞭人性弱點和矛盾的普通人。每一次重大的決定,都伴隨著巨大的情感代價,這讓角色的真實感倍增。情節推進上,節奏把握得非常到位,張弛有度,既有令人屏息的懸念,也有讓人會心一笑的溫情瞬間。盡管故事背景設定在這樣一個封閉的環境,但探討的主題卻是普世的:關於責任、失去與救贖。書中的配角群像也塑造得非常成功,每個人都有自己鮮明的個性和復雜的背景故事,共同編織瞭一幅豐富立體的生活畫捲。讀完之後,心中久久不能平靜,那種餘韻悠長,讓人忍不住想重新翻開書頁,去體會那些被自己可能忽略的微妙之處。這絕對是一部值得反復閱讀的佳作,它不僅僅是一個故事,更像是一次深入人心的生命體驗。
评分我必須說,這部作品的語言風格極其獨特,充滿瞭後現代主義的疏離感和一種近乎冷峻的觀察視角。它似乎並不急於給你一個明確的答案或清晰的道德指引,而是將碎片化的信息和意識流的敘述拋給你,讓你自己去拼湊和解讀。敘事者像一個冷眼旁觀的記錄者,用極其精準和剋製的詞匯,描繪著現代都市生活中那種難以言喻的焦慮和異化感。我特彆欣賞作者在結構上進行的大膽嘗試,時間綫被故意打亂,不同的視角和文體(比如插入的學術摘錄、廣告語,甚至是一份遺失的清單)相互碰撞,營造齣一種夢境般的邏輯。這需要讀者投入極大的專注力,但一旦你適應瞭它的“語境”,那種智力上的滿足感是無與倫比的。它探討的議題非常前沿,關乎身份認同在信息洪流中的消解,以及個體在宏大係統麵前的無力感。說實話,閱讀過程是挑戰性的,但這種挑戰性恰恰是其魅力所在,它拒絕平庸,迫使你跳齣舒適區去思考。對於那些厭倦瞭傳統綫性敘事,追求更深層次文本探索的讀者來說,這本書無疑是一劑強心針。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有