图书标签: 一战 国际关系 史学 历史 一战史
发表于2024-12-25
The Origins of the First World War pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
The seminal event of the 20th century, the origins of the First World War have always been difficult to establish and have aroused deep controversy. Annika Mombauer tracks the impassioned debates as they developed at critical points through the twentieth century. The book focuses on the controversy itself, rather than the specific events leading up to the war. Emotive and emotional from the very beginning of the conflict, the debate and the passions aroused in response to such issues as the 'war-guilt paragraph' of the treaty of Versailles, are set in the context of the times in which they were proposed. Similarly, the argument has been fuelled by concerns over the sacrifices that were made and the casualities that were suffered. Were they really justified?
一战史学“简”史。分成几个阶段,出现修正与反修正的多轮反复。每次德国的去战责运动都与时政密不可分。战争其间卸责;两战间美国战责分担论兴起旨在追究美参战决策,并配合国内孤立主义,欧本土则为防共;战后去罪化西德为与民族德性论做切割,北约则为防共。费舍尔争论颇有精神自虐倾向,矫枉过正,用战争爆发后修改的战争目标去论证战前目标有失精准。整篇综述鲜有涉及国关界的研究内容,即使是史学家的,也只是顺叙几位重要作者的观点并加以点评。
评分一战史学“简”史。分成几个阶段,出现修正与反修正的多轮反复。每次德国的去战责运动都与时政密不可分。战争其间卸责;两战间美国战责分担论兴起旨在追究美参战决策,并配合国内孤立主义,欧本土则为防共;战后去罪化西德为与民族德性论做切割,北约则为防共。费舍尔争论颇有精神自虐倾向,矫枉过正,用战争爆发后修改的战争目标去论证战前目标有失精准。整篇综述鲜有涉及国关界的研究内容,即使是史学家的,也只是顺叙几位重要作者的观点并加以点评。
评分极有用的史学史研究。也是一份大规模的文献综述。作者再次提醒人们,社会的政治关切与其对历史的解释有着紧密的关系。历史并不是按照事件发生的那样的客观和事实性的描述,必需清楚了解这些历史描述的源头。
评分一战史学“简”史。分成几个阶段,出现修正与反修正的多轮反复。每次德国的去战责运动都与时政密不可分。战争其间卸责;两战间美国战责分担论兴起旨在追究美参战决策,并配合国内孤立主义,欧本土则为防共;战后去罪化西德为与民族德性论做切割,北约则为防共。费舍尔争论颇有精神自虐倾向,矫枉过正,用战争爆发后修改的战争目标去论证战前目标有失精准。整篇综述鲜有涉及国关界的研究内容,即使是史学家的,也只是顺叙几位重要作者的观点并加以点评。
评分一战史学“简”史。分成几个阶段,出现修正与反修正的多轮反复。每次德国的去战责运动都与时政密不可分。战争其间卸责;两战间美国战责分担论兴起旨在追究美参战决策,并配合国内孤立主义,欧本土则为防共;战后去罪化西德为与民族德性论做切割,北约则为防共。费舍尔争论颇有精神自虐倾向,矫枉过正,用战争爆发后修改的战争目标去论证战前目标有失精准。整篇综述鲜有涉及国关界的研究内容,即使是史学家的,也只是顺叙几位重要作者的观点并加以点评。
评分
评分
评分
评分
The Origins of the First World War pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024