Velleius Paterculus, who lived in the reigns of Augustus and Tiberius (30 BCE-37 CE), served as a military tribune in Thrace, Macedonia, Greece and Asia Minor, and later, from 4 CE to 12 or 13, as a cavalry officer and "legatus" in Germany and Pannonia. He was quaestor in 7 CE, praetor in 15. He wrote in two books 'Roman Histories', a summary of Roman history from the fall of Troy to 29 CE. As he approached his own times he becomes much fuller in his treatment, especially between the death of Caesar in 44 BCE and that of Augustus in 14 CE. His work has useful concise essays on Roman colonies and provinces and some effective compressed portrayals of characters. "Res Gestae Divi Augusti." In his 76th year (13 CE-14) the emperor Augustus wrote a dignified account of his public life and work of which the best preserved copy (with a Greek translation) was engraved by the Galatians on the walls of the temple of Augustus at Ancyra (Ankara). It is a unique document giving short details of his public offices and honours; his benefactions to the empire, to the people, and to the soldiers; and his services as a soldier and as an administrator.
Velleius Paterculus, who lived in the reigns of Augustus and Tiberius (30 BCE–37 CE), served as a military tribune in Thrace, Macedonia, Greece and Asia Minor, and later, from 4 CE to 12 or 13, as a cavalry officer and legatus in Germany and Pannonia. He was quaestor in 7 CE, praetor in 15. He wrote in two books ’Roman Histories’, a summary of Roman history from the fall of Troy to 29 CE. As he approached his own times he becomes much fuller in his treatment, especially between the death of Caesar in 44 BCE and that of Augustus in 14 CE. His work has useful concise essays on Roman colonies and provinces and some effective compressed portrayals of characters.
Res Gestae Divi Augusti. In his 76th year (13 CE–14) the emperor Augustus wrote a dignified account of his public life and work of which the best preserved copy (with a Greek translation) was engraved by the Galatians on the walls of the temple of Augustus at Ancyra (Ankara). It is a unique document giving short details of his public offices and honours; his benefactions to the empire, to the people, and to the soldiers; and his services as a soldier and as an administrator.
评分
评分
评分
评分
坦白说,我原本以为这是一本只能供象牙塔里的学者翻阅的冷门著作,但读完之后才发现,它具有一种惊人的跨界吸引力。书中对于权力运作的精妙分析,对于政治策略的冷静剖析,即使放到当代的管理学或国际关系学中去审视,也依然闪烁着智慧的光芒。它不仅仅是关于“过去”的记录,更像是一面映照“现在”的镜子,通过理解古代的兴衰规律,能够为我们当下的决策提供一种历史的参照系和更深远的视角。这本书的价值,绝非仅仅在于记录了哪些事件,而在于它教导我们如何以一种更具批判性、更富同理心的态度去审视人类文明的永恒主题——秩序、冲突与变革。
评分我必须承认,初读此书时,我带着一种近乎苛刻的审视态度,毕竟“历史汇编”这个名字听起来往往意味着枯燥的资料堆砌。然而,作者的叙事手法却出乎意料地引人入胜,他巧妙地穿梭于宏大的历史叙事与细微的社会侧写之间,仿佛一位高明的导演,精准地控制着节奏和焦点。文字的张力十足,不仅仅是罗列事实,更是在重塑场景,让你仿佛能听到古罗马广场上的喧嚣,闻到提比略时代的空气。尤其是他对权力更迭背后那些微妙的人性博弈的刻画,深刻而富有洞察力,使得原本冰冷的史料鲜活了起来,那种对历史人物动机的深度挖掘,着实令人拍案叫绝,体现了作者深厚的历史洞察力和卓越的文字驾驭能力。
评分这本书的独特之处在于其对历史语境的还原深度,它没有停留在表面事件的描述,而是深入探讨了当时社会结构、法律体系乃至民间信仰是如何相互作用、共同塑造了那个伟大帝国的面貌。阅读过程中,我常常需要停下来,对照着书后附带的详尽地图和年表进行思考,这种主动的探索过程,极大地提升了阅读的参与感和理解的深度。作者对细节的执着令人印象深刻,无论是对某一特定条约的措辞分析,还是对地方行政长官任命的背景梳理,都显示出一种近乎偏执的严谨。它强迫读者走出简单的二元对立思维,去理解历史的复杂性和多维度性,这对于任何严肃的历史爱好者来说,都是一笔宝贵的精神财富。
评分从结构上看,本书的编排逻辑展现出一种高度的成熟与匠心。章节之间的过渡自然流畅,主题的切换并非突兀的跳跃,而是基于逻辑递进和时间线索的有机衔接,使得读者在追踪复杂事件链条时,不会感到迷失。更值得称赞的是,作者在保持宏观叙事连贯性的同时,并没有牺牲个案研究的充分性,那些被选中的关键人物和转折点,都被赋予了足够的篇幅进行立体化的剖析。这种平衡感是很多历史著作难以企及的,它既满足了专业研究者对论据的渴求,也为初涉此领域的读者提供了一个清晰易懂的导航系统,阅读体验流畅得如同观看一场精心编排的史诗歌剧。
评分这本书的装帧简直是一场视觉盛宴,厚重的封面仿佛蕴含着千年的智慧,那种皮革的触感和微微泛黄的纸张边缘,让人立刻沉浸到一种古老的氛围中。翻开扉页,那种油墨的香气混合着历史的沉淀感,简直让人忍不住想要立刻深入阅读。设计者显然在细节上花费了大量心思,字体选择典雅而庄重,与主题相得益彰,目录的排版清晰流畅,让人对即将展开的史诗篇章充满期待。拿到这本书,就不只是拥有一本书,更像是收藏了一件艺术品,它静静地躺在书架上,本身就是一种低调的宣告,宣告着主人对古典文明的深刻敬意。这本书的实体感和工艺水平,已经超越了一般教科书或普通读物的范畴,它为阅读体验奠定了坚实的物质基础,让人愿意花费更多的时间去品味其中的文字。
评分基本材料。前后风格差别好大,越到当代flatter的味道就越重。有趣的是Paterculus猛舔Cicero,Pompey和Brutus,或许是出于踩Anthonius的需要,不过这也就是说Paterculus并没有按照Caesarian和Pompeian的划分来选择赞美还是抨击的对象,而是集中炮火猛攻Anthonius,因此只要是和Anthonius作对的他都夸????但是从书中猛舔Sejanus来看,他是要在这个事情上栽跟头的…数字意识很有意思,特别是不断地回溯时间,不断强调事件发生距今有多少年,这和一般的顺时而下的编年史很不一样,可以说对现在的意识超过了对过去的意识。Introduction的评价很有意思:Paterculus比起作为一名Historian,更像一个Journalist????
评分基本材料。前后风格差别好大,越到当代flatter的味道就越重。有趣的是Paterculus猛舔Cicero,Pompey和Brutus,或许是出于踩Anthonius的需要,不过这也就是说Paterculus并没有按照Caesarian和Pompeian的划分来选择赞美还是抨击的对象,而是集中炮火猛攻Anthonius,因此只要是和Anthonius作对的他都夸????但是从书中猛舔Sejanus来看,他是要在这个事情上栽跟头的…数字意识很有意思,特别是不断地回溯时间,不断强调事件发生距今有多少年,这和一般的顺时而下的编年史很不一样,可以说对现在的意识超过了对过去的意识。Introduction的评价很有意思:Paterculus比起作为一名Historian,更像一个Journalist????
评分基本材料。前后风格差别好大,越到当代flatter的味道就越重。有趣的是Paterculus猛舔Cicero,Pompey和Brutus,或许是出于踩Anthonius的需要,不过这也就是说Paterculus并没有按照Caesarian和Pompeian的划分来选择赞美还是抨击的对象,而是集中炮火猛攻Anthonius,因此只要是和Anthonius作对的他都夸????但是从书中猛舔Sejanus来看,他是要在这个事情上栽跟头的…数字意识很有意思,特别是不断地回溯时间,不断强调事件发生距今有多少年,这和一般的顺时而下的编年史很不一样,可以说对现在的意识超过了对过去的意识。Introduction的评价很有意思:Paterculus比起作为一名Historian,更像一个Journalist????
评分基本材料。前后风格差别好大,越到当代flatter的味道就越重。有趣的是Paterculus猛舔Cicero,Pompey和Brutus,或许是出于踩Anthonius的需要,不过这也就是说Paterculus并没有按照Caesarian和Pompeian的划分来选择赞美还是抨击的对象,而是集中炮火猛攻Anthonius,因此只要是和Anthonius作对的他都夸????但是从书中猛舔Sejanus来看,他是要在这个事情上栽跟头的…数字意识很有意思,特别是不断地回溯时间,不断强调事件发生距今有多少年,这和一般的顺时而下的编年史很不一样,可以说对现在的意识超过了对过去的意识。Introduction的评价很有意思:Paterculus比起作为一名Historian,更像一个Journalist????
评分基本材料。前后风格差别好大,越到当代flatter的味道就越重。有趣的是Paterculus猛舔Cicero,Pompey和Brutus,或许是出于踩Anthonius的需要,不过这也就是说Paterculus并没有按照Caesarian和Pompeian的划分来选择赞美还是抨击的对象,而是集中炮火猛攻Anthonius,因此只要是和Anthonius作对的他都夸????但是从书中猛舔Sejanus来看,他是要在这个事情上栽跟头的…数字意识很有意思,特别是不断地回溯时间,不断强调事件发生距今有多少年,这和一般的顺时而下的编年史很不一样,可以说对现在的意识超过了对过去的意识。Introduction的评价很有意思:Paterculus比起作为一名Historian,更像一个Journalist????
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有