The taste of chocolate, the noise of a crowd, the visual impressions of filmic images - such sensory perceptions are rarely if ever discussed in relation to democratic theory. In response, Davide Panagia argues that by overlooking sensation, political theorists ignore a crucial dimension of political life. Drawing on Gilles Deleuze's and Jacques Ranciere's readings of Kantian aesthetics, Panagia posits sensation as a radical democratic moment of aesthetic judgment. He contends that sensory experience interrupts our perceptual givens, creating occasions to suspend authority and reconfigure the arrangement of a political order. Panagia claims that the rule of narrative governs our inherited notions of political subjectivity and agency, such that reading and writing are the established modes of political deliberation. Yet the contemporary citizen-subject is a viewing subject, influenced by film, photos, and other perceptual stimuli as much as by text. Challenging the rule of narrative, Panagia analyses diverse sites of cultural engagement including the visual dynamics portrayed in the film "The Ring", the growth of festival culture in late-fifteenth-century Florence, the practices of convivium espoused by the Slow Food movement, and the architectural design of public newsstands. He then ties these occasions for sensation to notable moments in the history of political thought and shows the political potential of a dislocated subjectivity therein. Democratic politics, Panagia concludes, involves a taking part in those everyday practices that interrupt our common modes of sensing and afford us an awareness of what had previously been insensible.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
目前就讀瞭第一章，論證瞭康德的美的直接性觀點和德勒茲indistinction與朗西埃歧感之間的關係。當然我覺得隻有康德講的清楚，其他兩位老哥就講的含混許多。其他章節都說一些經驗案例，以後有機會再看看
评分目前就讀瞭第一章，論證瞭康德的美的直接性觀點和德勒茲indistinction與朗西埃歧感之間的關係。當然我覺得隻有康德講的清楚，其他兩位老哥就講的含混許多。其他章節都說一些經驗案例，以後有機會再看看
评分目前就讀瞭第一章，論證瞭康德的美的直接性觀點和德勒茲indistinction與朗西埃歧感之間的關係。當然我覺得隻有康德講的清楚，其他兩位老哥就講的含混許多。其他章節都說一些經驗案例，以後有機會再看看
评分目前就讀瞭第一章，論證瞭康德的美的直接性觀點和德勒茲indistinction與朗西埃歧感之間的關係。當然我覺得隻有康德講的清楚，其他兩位老哥就講的含混許多。其他章節都說一些經驗案例，以後有機會再看看
评分目前就讀瞭第一章，論證瞭康德的美的直接性觀點和德勒茲indistinction與朗西埃歧感之間的關係。當然我覺得隻有康德講的清楚，其他兩位老哥就講的含混許多。其他章節都說一些經驗案例，以後有機會再看看
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有