Periodization and Sovereignty How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time Kathleen Davis "Everyone should read this book. There are at least two reasons I think so. The first is the sheer intellectual pleasure ot be had in grappling with its challenging and complex argument. The second is the exciting way the book models the kind of comparative, cross-field, interdisciplinary projects that everyone values but that few of us are trained to do. "--Criticism "Kathleen Davis, a skilled scholar of Anglo-Saxon and medieval English literature, and a courageously committed dialogist of medieval and postcolonial studies, has crafted a critical analysis of the political-theology of periodization. Her study is as dynamically precise as the structure of a protein. Composed in two parts, it intentionally folds in on itself in order to mark performatively the double bind of periodization--a mimesis of temporality and a Western juridical concept of sovereignty. Her aim is to explicate how the time of periodization is the time of sovereignty, or, put another way, sovereignty is a mode of temporality." --TMR Despite all recent challenges to stage-oriented histories, the idea of a division between a "medieval" and a "modern" period has survived, even flourished, in academia. Periodization and Sovereignty demonstrates that this survival is no innocent affair. By examining periodization together with the two controversial categories of feudalism and secularization, Kathleen Davis exposes the relationship between the constitution of "the Middle Ages" and the history of sovereignty, slavery, and colonialism. This book's groundbreaking investigation of feudal historiography finds that the historical formation of "feudalism" mediated the theorization of sovereignty and a social contract, even as it provided a rationale for colonialism and facilitated the disavowal of slavery. Sovereignty is also at the heart of today's often violent struggles over secular and religious politics, and Davis traces the relationship between these struggles and the narrative of "secularization," which grounds itself in a period divide between a "modern" historical consciousness and a theologically entrapped "Middle Ages" incapable of history. This alignment of sovereignty, the secular, and the conceptualization of historical time, which relies essentially upon a medieval/modern divide, both underlies and regulates today's volatile debates over world politics. The problem of defining the limits of our most fundamental political concepts cannot be extricated, Davis argues, from the periodizing operations that constituted them, and that continue today to obscure the process by which "feudalism" and "secularization" govern the politics of time. Kathleen Davisis the author of Deconstruction and Translation. She has taught in the Department of English at Princeton University and is currently on the faculty of the University of Rhode Island. The Middle Ages Series 2008 | 200 pages | 6 x 9 ISBN 978-0-8122-4083-2 | Cloth | $49.95s | GBP32.50 World Rights | History Short copy: By examining periodization together with the two controversial categories of feudalism and secularization, Kathleen Davis exposes the relationship between the constitution of "the Middle Ages" and the history of sovereignty, slavery, and colonialism.
這本書的行文節奏把握得極其精妙,簡直就像一部精心編排的交響樂。開頭部分,作者用一種近乎詩意的散文筆調,勾勒齣一種關於“秩序”與“邊界”的哲學冥想,那語言的流動性極佳,讀起來非常順暢,仿佛被一種無形的力量牽引著嚮前。然而,一旦進入到具體案例的分析,筆鋒立刻變得如同手術刀般精準和犀利。他不會沉溺於繁瑣的史料堆砌,而是像一個高明的辯論傢,總能在關鍵的曆史節點拋齣一個挑戰性的疑問,然後用極具穿透力的邏輯鏈條予以解答。我注意到他經常使用對比和反諷的手法來凸顯論點的張力,比如將某一特定時期的法律條文與同時代的民間諺語並置,這種“高雅”與“世俗”的碰撞,極大地豐富瞭文本的內涵。我個人認為,這本書最大的魅力在於其內在的張力——它既有學者的嚴謹,又不失思想傢的浪漫想象力。
评分這本書的語言風格非常獨特,它混閤瞭一種十九世紀古典主義的莊重和當代後結構主義的解構傾嚮。初讀時,我有些許不適應,因為它很少使用當代流行的那種快節奏、碎片化的錶達,而是偏愛使用冗長但結構嚴謹的長句,每一個從句都像是為前麵的主句做瞭最恰當的注腳。這種寫作方式要求讀者必須保持高度的專注,一旦走神,就很容易迷失在復雜的語法結構中。但一旦適應瞭這種節奏,就會發現其強大的內在邏輯美感。作者在處理復雜概念時,習慣性地引入大量的隱喻和典故,這些比喻不僅服務於說明,本身也構成瞭文本意義的重要組成部分。比如他對“界限的消融”的描述,用瞭‘濕潤的沙灘上的潮汐綫’這一意象,瞬間將一個抽象的政治哲學概念具象化瞭,那種畫麵感和震撼力,是直白的論述所無法企及的。
评分這本書的學術功底毋庸置疑,但更令人驚喜的是其敘事上的“戲劇性”。作者似乎深諳如何通過人物的側麵描寫和對關鍵行動的聚焦來推動論點。他筆下的人物,無論是古代的統治者還是早期的思想傢,都不是扁平的符號,而是充滿瞭內在矛盾和掙紮的個體。這種對個體經驗的關注,巧妙地平衡瞭宏大理論的抽象性,使得理論的闡釋變得有血有肉。我尤其欣賞作者在總結陳詞時所展現齣的那種剋製的情感張力——他不會直接下定論,而是將所有論證的重量都放在瞭前文的鋪陳之上,讓結論如同重磅炸彈般,在讀者心中炸開。讀完最後一頁,我閤上書本,一種強烈的知識滿足感和對現實世界運作機製更深層次的理解油然而生,這絕對是一部值得反復研讀的重量級作品。
评分這本書的裝幀設計本身就帶有一種古典的厚重感,拿到手裏沉甸甸的,封麵的排版很簡潔,但字體選擇和墨色的搭配卻透露齣一種不容置疑的權威性。我一翻開序言,就被作者那種娓娓道來卻又字字珠璣的敘事方式所吸引。他似乎總能找到一個恰到好處的切入點,將一個宏大而抽象的概念,通過一係列看似毫不相乾的曆史碎片巧妙地串聯起來。比如,他談到古代祭祀儀式的空間布局如何預示著後世的政治權力結構,那種論證的嚴謹性和跨學科的視野,實在令人嘆服。我特彆喜歡他處理時間維度的方式,不是簡單地綫性敘事,而是像一個技藝高超的織工,將不同時代的經緯綫交織在一起,織齣意義的圖案。讀完第一章,我感覺自己像是站在一個高聳的瞭望塔上,對整個曆史的脈絡有瞭一種全新的、俯瞰式的理解。這本書的文字密度很高,需要反復咀嚼,但每一次重讀,都會發現新的層次感,就像在解讀一幅精美的巴洛剋壁畫,細節豐富到讓人目眩神迷。
评分作為一名對曆史變遷抱有濃厚興趣的普通讀者,我發現這本書最大的挑戰性在於其對“時間觀”的重塑。作者似乎並不接受我們日常生活中那種綫性的、不可逆的時間概念,而是傾嚮於展示時間如何以循環、嵌套、甚至斷裂的方式存在於人類的集體記憶和社會結構之中。書中對一些關鍵曆史轉摺點的分析,完全顛覆瞭我原有的認知框架。例如,他對某個特定王朝中“朝會”儀式的詳細描摹,與其說是記錄曆史事件,不如說是在重建一種被遺忘的“時間體驗”。這種體驗是儀式化的、周期性的,與現代社會所追求的效率和進步觀形成瞭鮮明的張力。閱讀過程中,我常常需要停下來,進行深度的自我反思,思考我們當前所處的“時刻”是如何被過去的“時刻”所塑造和限定的。這本書不是提供答案的,它更像是一把精密的鑰匙,打開瞭理解世界復雜性的全新視角。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有